Previous Up

Taiwan's model on July 01, 2004

Hong Kong `no model for Taiwan'

DISAPPOINTMENT: All that the past seven years in Hong Kong has shown Taiwanese is that China breaks its promises, a Cabinet spokesman said
By Ko Shu-ling
STAFF REPORTER

 

The Hong Kong model of "one country, two systems" only shows how easily China reneges on its pledges and it would be impossible to transplant the model to Taiwan, the Cabinet said yesterday on the eve of the anniversary of Hong Kong's 1997 handover to China.

"Beijing's repeated breaking of its promises has only led Taiwanese people to believe that it doesn't mean what it says and that the model is unacceptable," Cabinet Spokesman Chen Chi-mai said in a press release made available yesterday afternoon.

According to Chen, information gathered by the Mainland Affairs Council showed that under Chinese rule over 157 incidents have taken place impinging on the territory's freedom, human rights and rule of law as of this month.

One of the most noteworthy was a ruling by China's most powerful legislative body in April according to which Hong Kong citizens cannot democratically choose a successor to unpopular Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa in 2007.

Beijing also said Hong Kong will be allowed to directly elect only some, and not all, its lawmakers in 2008.

Another incident was last years attempt to pass anti-subversion legislation which brought 500,000 people onto the street in protest on July 1.

The Hong Kong government has proposed to enact Article 23 of the Basic Law, which would prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the People's Republic of China or theft of state secrets. It would also ban political organizations and groups in Hong Kong from having contact with similar groups abroad.

Beijing said that passage of the legislation is required under the agreement that saw Hong Kong return to Chinese rule under the "one country, two systems" formula.

On the economic front, Chen said that Hong Kong's GDP per capita in 1997 was recorded at US$26,762 but had dwindled to US$23,027 last year.

Its jobless rate also skyrocketed from 1997's 2.2 percent to 8.7 percent in July last year.

According to an opinion poll administered by the Cabinet's Research, Development and Evaluation Commission in 1997, about 76 percent of the Taiwanese people questioned said that they did not approve of Beijing's solving cross-strait problems with the Hong Kong model of "one country, two systems."

The percentage had risen to 80.8 percent by April this year.

The Mainland Affairs Council yesterday published a paper analyzing political development in Hong Kong since its handover in 1997.

China's actions have fueled Hong Kong people's doubts about whether Beijing will abide by the "one country, two systems" formula which promised to Hong Kong a "high degree" of autonomy.

"Only freedom and democracy in Hong Kong can promote the region's prosperity and economic development," the report said.

The council, in a statement, said that Hong Kong played an important role in keeping peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. "Our government will carefully observe democratic development in Hong Kong and expand our service for Taiwanese in Hong Kong," the statement said.

additional reporting by Melody Chen

 

 

Ask not for whom the bell tolls...


China's promise that Hong Kong will remain unchanged for 50 years under the policy of "one country, two systems" has lasted for less than seven years. On the seventh anniversary of Hong Kong's handover to China, democratic groups are scheduled to launch a large-scale demonstration today, demanding that Beijing keep its promises of direct elections of the chief executive and the Legislative Council in Hong Kong. It's estimated that more than 300,000 people will take part in the protest.

Last year over 500,000 protesters took to Hong Kong's streets on this date to denounce the legislation based on Article 23 of the Basic Law. The action focused the attention of the world on the erosion of Hong Kong's freedoms and the delay in giving it accountable democratic government.

The government's legislation of a controversial anti-subversion law, which could have easily been used to cook up charges of treason against democracy activists, was frustrated as a result of the demonstration. But less than a year later, on April 26, China's National People's Congress dashed Hong Kong people's hopes to directly elect their leader and lawmakers by 2007 and 2008, respectively, basically trying to delay the democratic development of Hong Kong forever.

Economically, Hong Kong prospered mightily under British colonial rule. Although it suffered from the global economic downturn and the outbreak of SARS last year, its economy is recovering as the global economy grows this year. The Hang Seng Bank also revised its forecasts on Hong Kong's GDP growth for this year to 6 percent from 5.5 percent yesterday. Still, the halo surrounding Hong Kong's economy has faded. The exotic cultural crossroads atmosphere of Hong Kong's society has been replaced by Sinification. Hong Kong has lost its charm to become another drab Chinese city. If this was the intention of Hong Kong's nationalists, we can only congratulate them on their stunning success.

Hong Kong and Taiwan have both been deeply influenced by ideas of free trade, and over the last 50 years have also remained open to Western cultural influences and are therefore international in outlook. We must give our spiritual support to Hong Kong's demonstrators. Democracy has never been a gift from heaven and has always been paid for in the blood and sweat of the people.

On this anniversary of Hong Kong's handover to China, the oppressive rule they have endured over this period undermines the legitimacy of Beijing's insistence on the "one China" principle. Hong Kong's example reinforces the commitment of Taiwan to democracy, and the belief that the achievement must be protected. Taiwanese can see quite clearly the bleak result of putting faith in China's promises, which have been shown to be no more substantial than the clouds.

China has constantly sought to disparage Taiwan's democratic achievements, emphasizing that democratic politics are merely another way of gaining power, the aim of which is to declare independence. It has used this as a stick with which to beat Hong Kong's pro-democracy activists. But democracy is a universal value and Taiwan's democratic reforms are only a small part of a great international current flowing in this direction. Alone our strength might be insignificant, but we call on people all round the world to lend their voices in support of the people of Hong Kong in their action to achieve democracy.

 

 

Insight can be gained from a look at history

By Hau Eng-pang
 

The US State Department's US-China Economic Security Review Commission recently recommended that the US Congress and government re-assess their "one China" policy.

Given China and Taiwan's changing situations, the US should indeed review the policy's viability. Also deserving review is the topic of how the US can adjust its policy to support Taiwan's defense and how it can help the nation break out of its international economic isolation resulting from China's stranglehold.

The US report notes that China's recent conduct toward Taiwan and Hong Kong has prompted doubts concerning China's ability to find a peaceful resolution to the Taiwan question and to deliver its promise of autonomy to Hong Kong. As China's strength swells, its Asian neighbors are worried that the US' "war on terror" might push the region out of the US' focus.

In the 1970s, the tensions of the Cold War kept climbing and the UN's General Assembly passed a resolution introduced by Albania on Oct. 25, 1971, which declared "that the representative of the government of the People's Republic of China [PRC] is the only lawful representative of China to the United Nations."

The PRC thus replaced the Republic of China, in the UN's eyes, as the sole legitimate government of China.

In addition, to improve ties with China in order to counterbalance the Soviet Union, then US president Richard Nixon sent Henry Kissinger to secretly visit China twice in 1971. In the following year, Nixon himself made a trip to China and signed the Shanghai Communique, which stated that "the US acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China."

The US later re-affirmed this stance in the Communique Establishing US-PRC Diplomatic Relations in January, 1979 and the US-PRC Joint Communique of Aug. 17, 1982. Yet in 1979 the US Congress also ratified the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), a legal basis for the US' military support of Taiwan to maintain the peace in the Strait. The communiques and the TRA are products of Cold War ideology, and as such were instituted as temporary measures. More than 30 years on, these policies have failed to offer a resolution to the Taiwan question.

If Taiwan remains internationally isolated, the tension in the Strait will only escalate. China continues increasing its military power, having deployed about 500 missiles that are aimed at the nation.

If China invades Taiwan, the US will be forced into war with China -- or will abandon Taiwan. Surely, the US does not want to have to make that choice because any decision might destroy the peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region.

Taiwan's population of 23 million puts it 41st among the world's 192 countries. The nation's area -- 35,980km2 -- is somewhere between that of Holland and Belgium. Taiwan's net per capita income reaches US$13,000 and puts Taiwan 25th on the list of the world's most economically developed countries. Also, Taiwan is a democratic country where human rights are protected. Why must such a country be excluded from the international community?

If Taiwan's sovereignty is recognized by the international community, use of force against Taiwan will not be allowed and therefore the nation's security will be ensured.

Undeniably, the US' "one China" policy gives no regard to the Taiwanese people's will.

Now that Taiwan's government has received a fresh mandate through direct elections, it is time for the US to change the "one China" policy and give a hand to Taiwan to help it participate in international affairs.

Hau Eng-pang is the director of the Foundation of Modern Culture.

 

 

The skin graft that taught us love

By Cheng Jim-ming

 

Let love be the driving force for harmony. Let us cast prejudice and hatred aside. Let us emulate David Landsborough and his son, transcending blood ties and geographic boundaries to truly cherish Taiwan.

In the spirit of altruism, Dr. David Landsborough Sr. and his Taiwan-born son, David Jr. , dedicated themselves to helping Taiwan's poor and sick for 70 years. During his latest visit toTaiwan, Landsborough Jr. presided over the opening ceremony for the reconstructed Changhua Church, which he founded. Shortly after the event, Landsborough Jr. left Taiwan. But he also left behind him prayers and blessings for the people on this land. After reading the story of the Landsboroughs, I came to realize what love for Taiwan really means.

Born in Scotland in 1870, Landsborough Sr. was assigned to the Prebysterian Church's mission in Taiwan at the age of 25. One hundred and eight years ago, Landsborough Sr. founded the Changhua Christian Hospital. His deeds remain a shining example for medical practitioners, including the widely-read story A Skin Graft Given with Love. He opened a new page in Taiwan's medical history and set up a paradigm for the medical profession.

A Skin Graft Given with Love tells the story of Chou Chin-yao, a poor farm boy in Changhua in 1928. The 13 year-old suffered from serious skin ulcers on his right knee and the wound festered upward to his thigh. An amputation might be required to save Chou's life. In the hope of avoiding this, Marjorie Landsborough volunteered to donate skin from her thigh. Landsborough Sr. took the surgical knife himself and grafted four pieces of skin from his wife's thigh onto Chou's. At the time, there was no precedent for this procedure to which he could make reference.

Although the surgery failed due to mutual exclusion between heterogeneous bodies, Chou was on the mend. Later Chou even became a missionary under the Landsborough couple's guidance. In Changhua, everyone knows the heartwarming story. It is also an act of benevolence imprinted forever on the Chou family's memory. Chou himself once said, "Though the piece of skin could not be grafted onto my body, it is sewn in my heart."

That was not the end of the Landsborough legacy in Taiwan. To continue in the spirit of his father, Landsborough Jr. helped the Presbyterian Church in Changhua hold the first-ever foot washing ceremony in November, 1997. At the foot-washing, the superintendent of the Changhua Christian Hospital, Huang Chao-sheng , stooped down to wash his employees' feet. They hoped this act would stir a feeling, prompting the practitioners to serve in modesty to make up for the inadequate medical technology they had.

Landsborough Jr. himself was even more considerate to his patients. In winter, he would warm the stethoscope with his hands before he examined patients so that patients would not feel the instrument's coldness.

Landsborough Jr. picked up where his father left off. After taking the job of the superintendent of the Changhua Christian Hospital, he not only helped the poor acquire medical care but also gave financial support to the needy children for school. His selfless commitment also influenced his colleagues, who displayed a philanthropic spirit. At the age of 28, Marjorie Amy Brooking caught a tropical fever from her patients and died. On her tombstone was inscribed: "Love That Wilt Not Let Me Go: Life That Shall Endless Be."

If love could be fully integrated into life, it could be the driving force for world peace. Love is casting away prejudice and hatred.

Love is transcending blood ties and geographical boundaries as the Landsboroughs exemplify. When receiving the Taiwanese American Society's Award for Social Service, Landsborough Jr. expressed his sentiments by introducing himself as "a British Taiwanese who grew up in Changhua." He sees his responsibility in other people's need.

Landsborough Jr. and his wife dedicated themselves to serving Taiwan for 28 years. During that time, he never recieved any paycheck from the Changhua Christian Hospital. When he retired and returned to the UK, all he took with him were two valises and deep affection for Taiwan. Although his homecoming is brief, his valediction "to serve the people on this land with a humble heart" has left us inspired.

Landsborough Jr. grew up at the foot of Pa-Kua Mountain in Changhua County. With a medical degree in neurology from the UK, he chose to dedicate his youth to Taiwan, without regrets. The Landsborough family exemplifies the spirit of philanthropy.

President Chen Shui-bian dubbed Landsborough Jr. "a real son of Taiwan."

Indeed, the Landsboroughs contributed their youth, knowledge, blood and even skin to the people in Taiwan. Their love for Taiwan is the true love worthy of our respect.

I savored every word of the Landsborough story. Between the lines is the sparkle of humanity and Taiwan's vitality.

Cheng Jim-ming is a professor of journalism at the Graduate Institute of Journalism, Chinese Culture University.

 

 

 


Previous Up