Prev Up Next

¡@

Tibet police station attacked by monks
¡@

ESCALATING TENSIONS: Six people were arrested for involvement in the protest, while another 89 surrendered themselves to police. All but two were Buddhist monks

AP, BEIJING
Monday, Mar 23, 2009, Page 1


Approximately 100 Tibetan monks were arrested or turned themselves in yesterday after hundreds of protesters attacked a police station in northwest China, state media reported.

The protest appeared to be in retaliation for the disappearance of a Tibetan who escaped from police custody in Qinghai Province, Xinhua news agency reported.

The demonstration was the latest sign of Tibetan anger in a tense month of tightened Chinese security in the region because of a number of sensitive anniversaries.

Several hundred people ¡X including about 100 monks from the La¡¦gyab Monastery ¡X attacked the police station in La¡¦gyab, a township in the Tibetan prefecture of Golog, assaulting policemen and government staff on Saturday, Xinhua said.

The assault caused some slight injuries, Xinhua said, without elaborating.

A man who answered the phone at Qinghai¡¦s public security department said he had not heard about the attack or the arrests.

Phone calls to other police departments and government offices in the area rang unanswered.

Six people were arrested for alleged involvement in the riot, while another 89 people surrendered to police. All but two were monks, Xinhua said. Police were searching for other monks who took part in the attack but fled, Xinhua cited a local official as saying.

Order has been restored in the township, it said.

The violence began after a man accused of supporting Tibetan independence escaped from police custody on Saturday and went missing, Xinhua said.

Xinhua cited authorities as saying the man fled the La¡¦gyab police station after asking to go to the washroom, prompting a manhunt. It cited a witness as saying he was seen swimming in the Yellow River.

A former resident of the area who now lives in Dharmsala, India, said the protesters were angry because they believed the man, a 28-year-old monk named Tashi Sangpo, jumped in the river to commit suicide after fleeing.

¡§When Tashi was being interrogated by the officials, he asked their permission to go to the toilet. He then went out and jumped into the Yellow River,¡¨ the source said on condition of anonymity, citing fear of reprisals against his family still living in China. ¡§The dead body is yet to be found.¡¨

The exile said 500 monks from the monastery protested outside the local administration office and the group swelled to about 2,000 as others from the village joined in.

He said Tashi Sangpo was being investigated by police because he unfurled a Tibetan flag on the roof of the monastery on March 10, the anniversary of the start of the 1959 abortive Tibetan revolt against Chinese rule, and distributed pamphlets on the street urging unified protest against Chinese rule.

It was difficult to independently verify the account as government departments could not be reached yesterday.

Dharmsala is the seat of the Dalai Lama¡¦s self-proclaimed government-in-exile and the destination of many Tibetans who flee China.

¡@


¡@

WINNING HABIT
Cheerleaders for Pu-men Senior High School in Kaohsiung County, a school affiliated with Foguangshan Temple, celebrate as the school¡¦s basketball team defeats Taipei¡¦s Yang-ming Senior High School 67-62 during the championship game at the National Taiwan University Sports Center yesterday.


PHOTO: WANG YI-SUNG, TAIPEI TIMES

¡@


¡@

¡@


¡@

Ma¡¦s hallmark is a lack of courage

Monday, Mar 23, 2009, Page 8


American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Chairman Raymond Burghardt recently visited Taipei and met leaders of both the ruling and opposition parties. When talking to the media, Burghardt expressed concern over China¡¦s military threats to Taiwan and said Beijing posed a military threat to Taiwan as long as it has missiles aimed at Taiwan and that it should remove them. Perhaps President Ma Ying-jeou¡¦s (°¨­^¤E) government mistakenly believes that some of the messages Burghardt conveyed were in line with their own policies. But the Ma administration is kowtowing to China despite the hundreds of missiles aimed at us. This shows how the Ma administration is obsessed with China while the US continues to keep its wits.

China¡¦s military threat toward Taiwan is not something new. The 23 million people of Taiwan, regardless of their political affiliation and ethnicity, cannot escape the fact that they live each day with the threat of China¡¦s missiles.

However, the administration, which constantly talks about putting Taiwan first and doing what is best for the people of Taiwan, is really only concerned with Beijing¡¦s ¡§one China¡¨ principle and its dream that China will give Taiwan some international space.

The government believes simply relying on China will be enough to save Taiwan economically. It has never addressed the military threat that China poses to Taiwan. Perhaps Ma¡¦s team sees the 1,000-plus missiles as something pleasing, not the terrible threat they are.

Why does Burghardt have the courage to demand that China remove its missiles, while the Ma administration appears to care less about them? The reason is simple. The Ma administration has to beg China for many things and it cannot afford to offend Beijing because it sees China as Taiwan¡¦s savior. It¡¦s heavy reliance on China means it does not dare do anything not in line with China¡¦s thinking.

Let¡¦s look at it this way: Ma kowtowed to China for nine months before more than a fraction of the 3,000 Chinese tourists per day that he hoped would save Taiwan¡¦s ailing economy actually started coming here. The Amway China cruise came to Taiwan and the government used 1,000-plus participants and the money they spent here to boast of what a great job it has been doing to bolster the economy. Officials keep talking about the benefits, and even the necessity of an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China, but so far there has been no word that Beijing would actually agree to one.

Given these circumstances, how would Ma have the courage to demand that China remove their missiles?

The Taiwanese should not bother dreaming that Ma will make such demands. Neither the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or the Ma administration have made a formal demand during the cross-strait economic, trade and cultural forum or other cross-strait talks that China remove its missiles. The administration¡¦s cross-strait policies and dependence on China make it appear like a drug addict. It will never be able to kick its China habit. Direct links, Chinese tourism, the Straits Exchange Foundation-Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait pacts and relaxation of the restrictions on Chinese investment all clearly show how the government wants to make Taiwan¡¦s economy completely dependent upon China¡¦s. Once China has control over Taiwan¡¦s core businesses, unification will be a mere formality.

Of course the loosening of trade restrictions and steps toward an ECFA have been welcomed by some businesses, support the government has used as an excuse to ignore public criticism. In terms of cross-strait trade, however, a conflict exists between the interests of those businesses and the public. Employment opportunities will plunge when Taiwanese businesses head to China in search of low-cost labor. Things may get so tough that people will not even be able to afford school lunches for their children. As unemployment rises and real wages drop, income distribution will rapidly deteriorate and we will ultimately see the formation of an M-shaped society where only certain individuals will be able to enjoy the benefits of economic growth.

Beijing has often said that its missiles are meant to guard against Taiwanese independence. The missiles are really aimed at expediting unification. But since this is in line with Ma¡¦s goal of eventual unification, he views the missiles differently from the average Taiwanese and from the US. This difference explains Ma¡¦s lack of regard for public opinion despite his ¡§three noes¡¨ policy ¡X no unification, no independence and no use of force.

Ma wants to lock Taiwan¡¦s economy to China so that Chinese investment can flood the country. He is quite happy to postpone military procurements crucial to national defense and reduce the size of the military.

The public must wake up and face reality, no matter how many tourist extravaganza ¡§reality¡¨ shows the government keeps throwing in our faces.

¡@

Prev Up Next