|
Ma is pursuing a personal agenda
By Liu Shih-chung 劉世忠
Friday, Jan 22, 2010, Page 8
‘The prosecutor-general did in fact do some inappropriate things. But the timing
of the Control Yuan’s second decision coincided with Ma’s calls for speeding up
the case against Chen Shui-bian.’
Taiwan’s hard-won democracy is backsliding following two recent moves by
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in his quest for re-election.
The Ma administration’s handling of the Local Government Act and the Control
Yuan’s impeachment of Prosecutor-General Chen Tsung-ming (陳聰明) reflect Ma’s
electoral calculations.
Ever since he took office, Ma has relied on four pillars. One is the fact that
he received 58 percent of the vote in the presidential election. The second is
that he fast-tracked the cross-strait economic opening to fulfill his campaign
pledges. The third is his appeal for a “diplomatic truce” with Beijing to erase
Taiwan’s image as what Ma calls a “troublemaker” and build healthy US-Taiwan
relations. The last one is his campaign against corruption, mainly in the form
of the indictment and trial of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Yet the first three pillars have collapsed as a result of Ma’s inability to
boost the economy and rein in unemployment, and the government’s bungling of the
response to Typhoon Morakot in August.
While Taipei and Beijing have refrained from buying out each other’s diplomatic
allies and Taiwan was able to attend the most recent World Health Assembly (WHA)
as “Chinese Taipei,” Taipei is still excluded from this year’s Executive
Committee as an observer. This raises the question of whether China has set
conditions for allowing Taiwan more room for international participation.
US-Taiwan relations also suffered after the KMT-controlled legislature revised
the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法) to block imports of some US beef
products.
Washington accused Taipei of unilaterally violating the beef protocol signed by
the two countries.
With three of his pillars having collapsed and following his party’s
disappointing performance in the legislative by-elections in Yunlin County in
September, the three-in-one local elections in December and the three
legislative by-elections earlier this month, it’s no surprise that would Ma
resort to the only tactic left to him — utilizing the case against Chen
Shui-bian to consolidate his core supporters in the pan-blue camp.
Ma said after the by-election that the major reason for the KMT’s poor showing
was the government’s failure to impeach Chen Tsung-ming for his “inappropriate
behavior” after it emerged that he and then-minister of justice Shih Mao-lin
(施茂林) were invited by Huang Fang-yen (黃芳彥), the former first family’s physician,
to meet at Huang’s residence on Feb. 26, 2007.
Since Chen Tsung-ming was appointed by Chen Shui-bian, Ma blamed the KMT’s
electoral woes on the prosecutor-general for not pursuing the former president’s
case vigorously enough.
The initial impeachment vote against Chen Tsung-ming failed, but after Ma linked
the KMT’s troubles to Chen Tsung-ming, the Control Yuan passed the impeachment.
The prosecutor-general did in fact do some inappropriate things. But the timing
of the Control Yuan’s second decision coincided with Ma’s calls for speeding up
the case against Chen Shui-bian.
This raised the question of whether Ma was interfering in the judicial process
and the Control Yuan’s jurisdiction and therefore undermined judicial
independence and democracy.
The KMT’s last-minute maneuver to revise the Local Government Act, meanwhile, is
a threat to the public’s right to vote and be elected to office for fixed terms.
The original version, backed by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP),
stipulated that township and village chiefs and councilors should step down once
the new special municipality mayors are inaugurated. The chiefs and councilors
were to be replaced by civil service appointees. The term of those local chiefs
and councilors would in fact be extended for another year after their four-year
term is up.
The new version, supported by nearly three fourths of KMT legislators — under
direct orders from Ma as KMT chairman — allows 56 township chiefs to continue in
office as appointed political officials for up to four more years. They cannot
be dismissed by the incoming mayors.
Local politicians who were elected in December 2005 for four year terms, most of
whom are affiliated with the KMT’s local roots, will hold their positions for up
to nine years.
Again, the timing of this about-face was controversial and aimed at mobilizing
KMT’s grass-roots vote.
Ma is pursuing a personal agenda at the expense of judicial independence and
democracy. The question is: Should — and will — Taiwanese voters allow that?
Liu Shih-chung is a political commentator based in Taipei.
|
