|
China can’t ‘frighten the monkey’
By Ma Jian 馬建
Sunday, Jan 31, 2010, Page 8
When former Czech president Vaclav Havel knocked on the door of the Chinese
embassy in Prague to demand the release of writer Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波), I had an
eerie sense of deja vu. Thirty-three years ago, Havel helped initiate Charter
77, the landmark document that crystallized the ideals of all the dissidents —
and many others — trapped behind the Iron Curtain.
Havel, of course, was rewarded with a long jail sentence for his efforts. Now
Liu has been sentenced to 11 years imprisonment for much the same crime —
initiating Charter 08, perhaps the bravest attempt yet to chart a peaceful way
to freedom for China.
History is said to repeat itself, first as tragedy, second as farce, and it is
indeed farcical for China’s government to try to suppress the yearning for
freedom in the same brutal ways that Soviet-era communists once did. Jailing Liu
on the absurd charge of trying to overthrow the Chinese state is typical of the
type of thinking found in the closed societies of 20th century communism, where
the state asserted its absolute right to judge every thought and every thinker.
The progress of China’s economy over the past 30 years is something all Chinese
celebrate, but the jailing of Liu also demonstrates in the starkest terms that
China’s neglect of human rights is flowing to the rest of world alongside the
mass of Chinese goods. Indeed, it is becoming increasingly clear that China
opened its economy only to maintain the country’s over-mighty rulers in power,
not to respect and enhance the lives of ordinary Chinese.
Although China’s government does not keep any of its international commitments
on economic, social and cultural rights, the world’s democracies appear to have
lost their willingness to stand up for their beliefs, as US President Barack
Obama’s kowtow to China during his November visit painfully demonstrated. It was
a refusal to buckle to the values of Nazism and Communism in the 20th century
that ensured the success of freedom. Liberty today needs the same type of
stalwart defense.
Yes, civilization seems to be on the defensive. Though many people seem to be in
denial about this, politics has retreated to a renewal of the last century’s
long struggle for democracy and freedom. China’s model of authoritarian
capitalism appears triumphant, but there is nothing genuinely new about this
model — like all dictatorships, it deprives people of political rights and
freedom of speech. Chinese intellectuals face the cruelest reality — harsh
suppression and a popular audience devoted to mammon and materialism.
The globalization of commercial interests, however, does retain some power to
restrict Chinese authoritarianism if only the world’s democracies would seize
it. Weak states, of course, tend to be cynical about China’s growing might. The
problem is that the global economic crisis has led even advanced Western states
to question the wisdom of allowing the political civilization of human rights to
interfere with the quest to restore economic growth.
Democratic politicians must not surrender their consciences to woo either their
own economically jittery citizens or the Chinese regime.
Havel captured this idea perfectly when he criticized Obama’s silence on human
rights when he was in Beijing.
Fortunately, China’s jailing of Liu will not, as we Chinese say, succeed in its
effort to frighten the monkey by killing a chicken. Liu is too invisible to
ordinary Chinese for that to happen. No, the incarceration of Liu is targeted at
those who value democracy, both within China and abroad. It is an effort to
criminalize democratic ideas and force people to choose between those ideas and
doing business with China.
China’s economy needs world markets as much as world markets need China.
Moreover, the West’s inclination to appease China will gradually cause ordinary
Chinese to lose confidence that economic modernization will ever set them free.
So continued silence when poets, writers or lawyers are treated like criminals
will only assure that China’s markets are eventually lost alongside freedom. A
closed society will eventually return to a closed economy.
The real criminal in the Liu affair is, of course, the Chinese state — but those
who think that China’s authoritarianism and mighty economy will prevail are
guilty as well. Such a system is as unsuited to the future as Mao’s system was
to the past.
Ma Jian is a novelist.
|
