|
Ma needs to wield power carefully
By Honigmann Hong, Lai Chung-chiang, Chen
Shang-chih 洪財隆,賴中
Monday, Apr 26, 2010, Page 8
In March 2008, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) became the sixth elected president
of the Republic of China (ROC) with almost 7.66 million votes. Over his two
years in office, Ma has continued to promote cross-strait negotiations and
policies that involve opening Taiwan up to China.
He has promoted these policies by relying on his legitimacy as a popularly
elected president, and although differences of opinion are unavoidable in a
democracy, Ma has completed the groundwork for opening Taiwan up to China thanks
to the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) legislative majority.
However, we care deeply about the development of democracy in Taiwan, and in the
face of ongoing talks about the signing of an economic cooperation framework
agreement (ECFA) with China, we feel it necessary to alert Ma to the following
points.
The first point pertains to the limits of legitimacy of a popularly elected
president. Although the president can decide the overall principles of national
security policies, this does not mean he can do whatever he wants.
The 7.66 million votes Ma received two years ago is less than half of Taiwan’s
population and, more importantly, the principles of democracy still apply once
an election is over. The fact that people voted for Ma does not mean they gave
him a blank check to do as he pleases.
While most Taiwanese believe Taiwan and China should engage in negotiations,
that does not mean a majority of the public agree with China’s premise that
anything can be discussed based on the “one China” principle. The Taiwanese
public were even more worried in 2005 when Lien Chan (連戰), in his capacity as
KMT chairman, signed a joint communique with the General-Secretary of the
Chinese Communist Party Hu Jintao, (胡錦濤).
The communique stated that cross-strait negotiations should use the “direct
three links” as a starting point and continue via the establishment of an
economic cooperation mechanism, a cross-strait common market, a military
confidence-building mechanism, then on to a peace agreement and a final
solution. These guidelines clearly go beyond the powers bestowed on national
leaders by the Constitution to handle matters of national security.
The second point is that a cross-strait trade agreement forced on the Taiwanese
would lack legitimacy. While most people agree to a pragmatic approach to
cross-strait trade and economic exchanges, a public consensus has yet to be
reached on the issue of whether Taiwan and China should cancel the majority of
tariffs and legal restrictions on trade then combining Taiwan and China into a
free-trade area. These issues fill many people with doubt and worries.
Ma recently said in an interview that the ECFA talks focus on small but
necessary issues and will be implemented gradually.
However, since current public opinion opposes the policy of creating a
free-trade zone between Taiwan and China, what legitimacy and power does the
president have to sign an economic agreement which would lead to the integration
of the two sides into a free-trade area?
The third point we would like to make is that of responsible politics and
generational justice. The policies and laws formulated by popularly elected
officials can and do stay in place beyond their terms in office and therefore
are legally binding and influence future generations. It is precisely for this
reason that democratic politics require politicians to use their power carefully
and take responsibility for future generations.
In particular, policies which relate to national security and the rights and
welfare of the public must be limited by the principle of responsible politics.
To ensure this, information on policies must be transparent, monitoring and
checks and balances are necessary and should come from the separation of powers,
and, where necessary, major issues should be decided by the public through a
referendum.
The current ECFA policy which relies on China “letting the people of Taiwan
benefit” may well let the current generation reap the benefits of the “early
harvest” program that will result in more Taiwanese exports going to China.
However, the next generation will have to deal with the impact on local
industries of tariff-free imports from China. This is a very serious issue that
will influence the welfare of future generations.
The government, however, is not disclosing information about the ECFA, it is not
letting the legislature review it and it is not willing to put it to a
referendum. These moves pose an unprecedented threat to Taiwan’s democracy and
welfare.
We therefore urge Ma to be cautious when using his presidential powers. We also
urge him to slow down the pace of the ECFA talks.
He should adopt a more responsible attitude and ensure that this major policy,
which is linked to cross-strait relations and the future of democracy in Taiwan,
be decided through open discussion.
If not, the inking of an ECFA will not only further aggravate domestic
divisions, it will also increase social tensions on both sides of the Taiwan
Strait. We are sure that this is something Ma does not want to see.
Honigmann Hong is an assistant professor in the China studies
program at National Tsing Hua University, Lai Chung-chiang is a lawyer and Chen
Shang-chih is an assistant professor in the department of political science at
National Chung-Cheng University.
|
