|
Handle our democracy with care
By Ku Chung-hwa 顧忠華
Friday, Aug 20, 2010, Page 8
We have seen a lot of the Economic Cooperation Framework
Agreement (ECFA), as have legislators.
They have been grappling with it, and each other as a result, throughout the
seventh Legislative Yuan session. So much so that the process has spilled over
into a post-recess special legislative session, meeting the same fate as the
amendments to the Local Government Act (地方制度法), which had been passed in the
previous session earlier this year. So once again, we have the spectacle of
legislators from both parties reduced to scrapping in the nation’s legislature
playing on our TV screens, yet more ammunition for the foreign press to use to
gawk in wonder at what passes for politics in Taiwan.
Legislators on both sides seem to view parliament as a battlefield on which to
wage their political warfare. Far be it for them to actually engage in rational
political debate in the interests of arriving at a satisfactory conclusion. We
would not, I think, be overly remiss in wishing they would conduct themselves in
a way more suited to the spirit of democracy. Nor, I feel, could we blame
ourselves for having strong reservations about how the special legislative
sessions have been handled. A glaring example of this was the session carried
out in the absence of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators after they
walked out last month. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) took advantage of the
empty seats, seizing the opportunity to unilaterally rush through a number of
controversial laws in a clear show of their disdain for the democratic process.
It’s quite depressing, really.
The fact is that these sessions should only be called under special
circumstances or in emergencies. According to Articles 68 and 69 of the
Constitution, the legislature is to meet for two sessions every year and special
sessions can only be called for two reasons — the first when the president seeks
a consultative session; the second when a quarter or more legislators agree to
it. In the entire history of constitutional government in Taiwan, there have
only been 13 occasions on which a special session has been called. The first was
in 1951, followed by another the next year, and then there were the politically
tumultuous years between 2000 and 2008, when the DPP was in power. This period
saw no less than eight sessions. That leaves three for the recent seventh
session, with another slated for this month. This is a record number of special
sessions.
In our capacity as monitors to the legislature, it falls on us to ask: Who gave
legislators the right to drag their heels during normal sessions just so they
can abuse special sessions to play catch-up? The legislature is playing with
fire here, risking the whole edifice of constitutional government going up in
flames. One wrong move and we could have a constitutional crisis on our hands.
Even though the KMT allowed the existence of the Young China Party and the China
Democratic Socialist Party, both minor, legally recognized political parties,
during the Martial Law period, they have once again, even in the 21st century,
overseen a transition to a virtual one-party legislature. This outrageous state
of affairs is a slap in the face to the constitutional government system that
took so long to build. One piece of legislation that was passed in such
conditions was the Rural Revitalization Act (農村再生條例), which encountered all
kinds of problems the moment it was passed. If that ran into problems, one can
only imagine what’s going to happen to the planned amendments to the
demarcations of legislative constituencies that the KMT still wants to slip
through in the next special session.
What with the ruling and opposition parties being at each others’ throats, it is
going to be difficult to see any budgets and laws passed. These special sessions
are on shaky ground vis-a-vis our constitutional democracy. The public will have
to keep its eye on the people who are supposed to be representing them in the
Legislative Yuan.
We ask the DPP not to withdraw from the special session. We also call on the
ruling and opposition parties to work together and not get distracted by
legislation other than the ECFA. It is important to break the mold of the failed
special session. Democracy is still quite fragile in this country, and we must
handle it with care.
Ku Chung-hwa is chairman of Citizens’ Congress Watch.
|
