|
No more double standards, please
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010, Page 8
The government recently expressed the hope that the US legal
system would show flexibility in the case of three Taiwanese executives barred
from leaving the US, where they face price-fixing charges. While the show of
support for the company and its executives was predictable, the Ma
administration would do better to focus on its own shortcomings if it hopes to
make a convincing argument before a US court.
In June, AU Optronics, a Texas subsidiary and six executives were indicted by
the US Department of Justice, along with six other Asian flat-panel firms, on
charges of conspiring to fix prices over a five-year period. The six other
companies pleaded guilty in plea-bargain deals, including two Taiwanese firms,
one South Korean and three Japanese. Nine executives received prison terms
ranging from nine to 14 months.
AU Optronics has steadfastly denied the accusations. Chief executive Chen Lai-juh
(陳來助), vice chairman Chen Hsuan-bin (陳炫彬) and former board member and executive
vice president Hui Hsiung (熊暉) went to the US last month to contest the charges.
They were to be released on US$10 million bail after both the company and
Taiwan’s government guaranteed they would continue to appear in court. However,
prosecutors cited the lack of an extradition treaty between the US and Taiwan in
arguing that the men posed a flight risk. The court agreed and on Aug. 19 it
ordered the trio to surrender their passports.
There has been widespread outrage in Taiwan, especially in business and
government circles, over the court’s action, with mutterings about presumption
of innocence and onerous hardships for both the men and the company, since a
trial could be months away, not to mention of many months’ duration.
It is easy to understand the US prosecutors’ position. It’s harder to muster
support for the government’s outrage, given the number of cases in Taiwan where
a court has slapped a travel ban on a suspect, only for them to mysteriously
slip out of the country unhindered.
Look at the number of relatively anonymous white-collar suspects under travel
bans who have managed to escape over the years, while former president Chen
Shui-bian (陳水扁), one of the best-known faces in the nation — who would have
presumably had a much harder time getting into an airport without notice, much
less out of one — has been kept in detention almost continually since his arrest
because he is considered a flight risk (or might try to destroy evidence).
Where are former legislative speaker Liu Sung-fan (劉松藩), former Rebar Asia
Pacific Group chairman Wang You-theng (王又曾) and former Kaohsiung City councilor
Chu An-hsiung (朱安雄) now, to name but a few of the more prominent fugitives from
Taiwan’s judicial system?
AU Optronics and its executives should be presumed innocent. However, the main
obstacle to the trio being free to return home pending trial is the lack of an
extradition treaty. The Taiwan-US Mutual Legal Assistance Agreement does not
cover the extradition of suspects or convicted criminals. While the decision of
Chen Lai-juh, Chen Hsuan-bin and Hui Hsiung to go to the US last month to face
the charges shows an admirable willingness to argue their innocence, it is
understandable that Taiwan’s assurances that they would return to the US for
future court appearances would be treated with skepticism.
Given that the legal system in Taiwan has proved incapable of keeping many of
its own high-profile defendants — or convicted criminals — from evading justice,
how can the government seriously expect to convince courts in other nations this
time will be different? What if it was not AU Optronics’ guarantees that failed
to sway the court in California, but the Ma administration’s lack of
credibility?
|
