|
¡@
The law is an ass
Monday, Sep 06, 2010, Page 8
Having traveled extensively during my life and spent time in a number of foreign
countries, I am rarely shocked by human activities. However, the recent
activities of the judiciary in Taiwan have succeeded in shocking me (¡§Stricter
penalties for pedophiles being mulled, Sept. 4, page 1).
While corruption and stupidity spare no field of human endeavor, the judges
referred to in the article show such a lack of sympathy for helpless, innocent
victims and such ignorance that the only possible solution is to demand their
immediate retirement. They have made a mockery of justice, turned Taiwan into an
international laughing stock and understandably outraged the public.
Everybody justifiably considers pedophilia to be a horrifying crime since it
targets the most helpless members of a society ¡X the children ¡X who are
physically, mentally and psychologically incapable of dealing with such an
assault. Acts of this nature psychologically scar the victims for life, while
the perpetrators of these heinous crimes are released after a few short years to
restart their lives free of the scarring they inflicted upon their victims.
The crime of sexually assaulting a child should be deemed one of the worst
crimes in any civilized society and deserves to be punished to the full letter
of the law. This is universally true, except in Taiwan apparently, where these
abominable criminals are given lenient sentences by moronic judges.
One such Kaohsiung judge, faced with a defendant who had sexually violated a
six-year-old girl with his hands, handed down a lenient sentence because the
crime was actually ¡§having sex with a person under 14 years of age¡¨ rather than
¡§sexual assault,¡¨ which carries a longer jail term. This ¡§learned¡¨ judge¡¦s
reasoning: the young child ¡§did not show a strong will¡¨ in fighting off her
attacker. This idiotic logic never explained how a six-year-old could possibly
be expected to handle a situation most adults would find overwhelming.
The explanation was that there were mitigating circumstances: namely, that the
perpetrator did not use violence. Such twisted thinking and inhumane attitude
should preclude this so-called judge from handling judicial matters in Taiwan.
Why would anyone need to use violence to subdue a six-year-old girl? Rather than
facing the full fury of an outraged society and the penalty befitting a terrible
crime, the defendant was given a three-year sentence. The uproar which resulted,
led to a promise ¡§to reflect and improve¡¨ on the part of the judiciary. Perhaps
the criminal made the same promise.
The Supreme Court asked the Taiwan High Court to reconsider a similar case,
where the perpetrator who had assaulted a three-year-old girl was given a
seven-year sentence. The court was asked to reconsider the sentence as ¡§sexual
assault.¡¨ Because ¡§the young girl did not resist the offender¡¨ it was rather
another case of ¡§having sex with a person under 14 years of age.¡¨
This level of ignorance is simply staggering. What normal person could
conceivably expect a three-year-old to resist?
Judicial Reform Foundation executive director Lin Feng-jeng (ªL®p¥¿) correctly
pointed out that the problem was not the laws, as these judges claimed, but the
judges themselves. There is no formal system for evaluating judges or ¡§weeding
out unsuitable judges,¡¨ according to Foundation of Hope executive director Chi
Hui-jung (¬ö´f®e). Until there is, Taiwan will continue to be a laughing stock, the
public will continue to be outraged, and pedophiles will continue to be coddled.
Chaim Melamed
Pingtung
¡@
|
