|
¡@
We are still not yet at the ¡¥end of
history¡¦
By Margot Chen ³¯ÄRµâ
The third wave of democratization, a concept popularized by US political
scientist Samuel Huntington in 1974, culminated with the fall of the Berlin Wall
in 1989 and the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Francis Fukuyama, another
political scientist, wrote in his 1992 book entitled The End of History and the
Last Man, based on his 1989 essay The End of History?, that Western liberal
democracy and capitalism may be the ¡§end of history¡¨ in the sense that they are
the final form of government, because there is simply no better system of
government to replace it.
However, after the wave of democratization reached its apex in the 1990s,
democracy around the world now appears to be retreating and this is a threat
that must be taken seriously.
First of all, democracy is retreating in many emerging democracies as electoral
irregularities, serious corruption, government incompetence, centralization of
power and religious and ethnic confrontation are paralyzing the operation of
their democratic mechanisms.
Next, although the Soviet Union passed into history years ago, the Chinese
Communist Party (CCP) regime is still around. Over the past 20 years, it has
learned how to use technology to better control its people. It has also applied
the operative logic of Western capitalism and globalization to the use of its
massive land area and labor force to grow stronger.
This ¡§Chinese model¡¨ has been imitated by many other authoritarian regimes. The
logic that is intended to lead to the development of a harmonious social and
economic development could be seen as the CCP¡¦s ideology for the 21st century,
used to brainwash the Chinese people to maintain the legitimacy of its rule.
This is also the main reason why the ¡§Jasmine Revolution¡¨ cannot spread to
China.
However, a closer look at the Jasmine Revolution reveals that it is a
materialistic one based on public anger and dissatisfaction with living
standard-related issues, such as unemployment, commodity prices and inflation,
and not on spiritual or political concerns. It is thus difficult to say that
what has happened in Tunisia and Egypt is essentially democratic revolutions. In
addition, while the revolutions there may have been successful, it is still too
early to say whether it will result in a smoothly operating democracy. It is
simply too optimistic to say that this is the beginning of a fourth wave of
democratization.
Compared with the Jasmine Revolution, the third wave of democratization rolled
into Taiwan just as its economy was taking off and the public was making
far-reaching demands for political participation and reform. This gave the
changes an essentially ideological aspect as the public began to see themselves
as masters of their country. In contrast with the bloody Jasmine Revolution,
Taiwan¡¦s was quiet and peaceful, which is both rare and very valuable. Still, we
must be cautious, as Taiwan, just like many of the other democracies that
emerged during the third wave of democratization, is now facing the risk of
democratic regression.
Margot Chen is a research fellow at Taiwan Advocates.
¡@
|
