|
Taiwan vote
encourages China’s bloggers
By Andrew Jacobs / NY Times News Service, BEIJING
There was another winner in the election this weekend that handed President Ma
Ying-jeou (馬英九) a second term in office — the faint but unmistakable clamor for
democracy in China.
Thanks in large part to an uncharacteristically hands-off approach by Chinese
Internet censors, the campaign between Ma and Democratic Progressive Party
presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was avidly followed by millions of
Chinese, who consumed online tidbits of election news and biting commentary that
they then spit out far and wide through social media outlets.
As the election played out last Saturday, a palpable giddiness spread through
the Twitter-like microblog services that have as many as 250 million members.
They marveled at how smoothly the voting went, how graciously the loser, Tsai,
conceded and how Ma gave his victory speech in the rain without the benefit of
an underling’s umbrella — in contrast with the pampering that Chinese officials
often receive.
“It’s all anyone on Weibo was talking about this weekend,” Renmin University
political science professor Zhang Ming (張明) said, referring to Sina Weibo,
China’s most popular microblog service.
Users expressed barbed humor about their own unelected leaders — and envy over
Taiwan’s prodigious liberties — but also deeply felt pride that their putative
compatriots pulled off a seamless election free of the violence that marred
previous campaigns in Taiwan, including a 2004 assassination attempt against
former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
“On the other side of the sea, Taiwan erected a mirror. And on this side of the
sea, we saw ourselves in the future,” read one well-forwarded comment by Xu Wei,
a wine expert.
The election, Taiwan’s fifth since it traded authoritarian rule for democracy in
1996, presented leaders in China with something of a challenge. While the
Chinese Communist Party has long sought to portray democracy as unsuitable for
the Chinese nation, it also considers Taiwan a part of China — despite a schism
during which Taiwan has developed strongly-held ideas about free speech and
self-determination.
To allow unfettered news media coverage of the race was out of the question, but
to strangle the news online of a major international story might have provoked
an uncomfortable backlash from China’s increasingly savvy Internet users. The
result was schizophrenic: In contrast to the relatively freewheeling commentary
found on microblogs and Internet news portals, the official press provided spare
and neutered coverage of the balloting.
In its few dispatches on the race, Xinhua news agency avoided the words
“democracy” and “president,” and it cast the contest as a local election, in
keeping with Beijing’s stance that Taiwan is a breakaway province.
Overall, Xinhua’s reports have presented Ma’s win as a validation of Beijing’s
newfound cross-strait detente, which has led to reduced tensions between the two
governments, while enriching Taiwan’s economy with increased trade and tourism.
“The people of Taiwan have used their votes to express their desire for peace of
mind, stability and development,” Xinhua wrote.
As is typical for politically sensitive news events, Chinese newspapers were
instructed to run only Xinhua’s account of the election, but many editors
appeared to make up for such constraints by running banner headlines, splashy
graphics and large photographs of a triumphant, rain-soaked president.
“No one told us we couldn’t put the election on our front page, so that’s what
we did,” one editor of a large daily newspaper said.
David Bandurski, a researcher at Hong Kong University’s China Media Project,
said the disparity in coverage between the state media and privately owned
Internet news portals suggested that officials were still unsure how to grapple
with a rapidly evolving medium.
“The control regime, if you call it that, is still trying to catch up,” he said.
“If their approach is too stringent, they risk a blowback.”
For those who hanker for reform, the momentary stasis was welcome. An early
opening arrived last month, when Chinese found they were able to watch the
presidential debates online.
Just as impressive for many were the campaign photographs that showed the
candidates glad-handing in public. One image that inspired a welter of favorable
reaction was an encounter between Ma and a peevish pork vendor who turned away
in disgust.
“At a time like this, one can really see who is the servant and who is the
master, and experience what a balanced system is,” the Chinese blogger Han
Zhiguo (韓志國) wrote.
Interest in the race snowballed in recent weeks and a number of high-profile
Chinese businessmen traveled to Taiwan to see the contest up close. Among them
was Wang Shi (王屹), one of China’s biggest real-estate tycoons, who sent out
regular microblog dispatches from political rallies.
“Everything went orderly and there were no surprises,” he wrote over the weekend
to his 4 million followers. “The political environment has really matured.”
Another Chinese businessman who spent several days in Taiwan said the election
had a profound impact on his understanding of politics. Seated on a plane bound
for Beijing on Sunday night, he described how he had been led to believe that
Taiwan’s democracy was chaotic and shallow, its elections prone to violence. Not
anymore, he said.
“This is an amazing idea, to be able to choose the people who represent you,”
said the man, who asked to remain nameless so he could speak without restraint.
“I think democracy will come to China. It’s only a matter of time.”
However, it seems the most telling commentary on the election was a joke that
had been forwarded thousands of times in recent days.
A Taiwanese man brags to his Chinese friend that he will go to the polls in the
morning and know the results that evening.
“You guys are too backward,” the Chinese friend responds. “If we had to vote
tomorrow morning, we would already know who is elected by tonight.”
|
