|
Election shows need
for reform in media
By Lu Shih-hsiang 盧世祥
There were three major factors at play in the Jan. 14 presidential and
legislative elections — these did real damage to the success story of Taiwanese
democracy and demonstrated that we still have some way to go before the country
can be considered a normal democratic nation.
These factors were negative propaganda and misinformation, the glaring disparity
in resources available to the parties, and overseas interference. In talking of
overseas interference, this refers specifically to that, either direct or
indirect, of China and the US.
The disparity in resources refers to the vast wealth of the Chinese Nationalist
Party (KMT), and the access it had to the state apparatus and government
resources. Perhaps the most shameful aspect, however, is the stubborn stain of
vote-buying and the willingness of some to trade their electoral say for
monetary gain.
For the negative propaganda and misinformation, blame the various media outlets
prepared to put their own political beliefs and profit before professional
integrity, more so perhaps than ever before.
One expects politicians to resort to negative campaigning — it is in their
blood; they will not change. However, the press, supposedly an impartial
observer, should not stoop to character assassination.
Certain elements within the media went beyond simply dancing to the KMT’s tune,
by calling for the blood of People First Party (PFP) candidate James Soong (宋楚瑜)
and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). One
editorial in the Chinese-language United Daily News went as far as to claim that
Soong supported Tsai. Not only did such a statement betray the writer’s own
political hysteria and lack of journalistic integrity, it might even have been
illegal.
In the past the media have been accused of unfair and factually unsound
reporting, political favoritism, inaccurate opinion polls and inflated vote
counts. This time round, they were also quite happy to accept “infomercials” and
other propaganda on behalf of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the KMT.
Such latitude derives surely from ideological affiliation and an
anti-independence stance on the part of the press. That, and the abandonment of
a commitment to being the “perpetual opposition” — one of the basic roles the
press should fulfil as the fourth estate — as well as a long-standing
relationship with KMT governments.
The media’s preoccupation with profit and their ideological stance made it
easier for China to interfere in the presidential election.
During previous presidential elections in Taiwan, China has employed both verbal
and military intimidation, relying on missiles fired over the Taiwan Strait on
the orders of the Chinese president, and on the Chinese premier and other senior
officials making personal appearances and giving inflammatory speeches.
Now all they need to do is make pronouncements through the Taiwan Affairs Office
and someone in Taiwan will press the message home, aided and abetted by a media
scornful of a Taiwan-centric perspective. No longer do senior Chinese figures
actually have to make personal appearances, and the effect of the intimidation
is that much greater as a result.
The KMT and the Chinese Communist Party finally got the upper hand in the battle
for public opinion played out in the press over the so-called “1992 consensus.”
Should the media continue down this slippery slope, the country will never be
able to develop into a normal democratic society.
Lu Shih-hsiang is an adviser to the Taipei Times.
Translated by Paul Cooper
|
