|
Putting nuclear
nightmares to bed
By Peter Chang ±iªZ×
Following the crisis at Japan¡¦s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in March
last year, academics from a dozen universities and colleges conducted a study on
how their students and other members of the public felt about nuclear power in
Taiwan. The study showed that Taiwanese are almost universally uneasy about the
country¡¦s nuclear power plants and that a very high percentage hope a more
effective renewable energy source can be found.
The state-run Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) and the Ministry of Economic Affairs
have for some time been engaged in scaremongering, telling the public that the
country is an island nation with few energy resources. Without nuclear power, so
their argument goes, we would not be able to produce enough power, which would
lead to higher electricity bills. However, is this really the case?
According to international organizations, such as the US¡¦ Bureau of
International Information Programs (IIP), Taiwan is, shockingly, ranked 14th in
the world in terms of power usage per person. Furthermore, the countries that
rank above Taiwan in their power usage are either those in colder climes at
higher latitudes ¡X such as Finland, Sweden, Norway or Canada ¡X or other
countries in tropical regions that are much wealthier, such as oil-producing
Kuwait and Bahrain.
Taiwan uses ¡X or wastes ¡X far more energy than more economically and
industrially advanced nations that have no, or severely lack, natural energy
resources, such as Singapore, Switzerland, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, the
Netherlands and Israel.
So why do Taiwanese waste so much electricity? Taipower has consistently said
that Taiwan has hot weather, so people need electricity to maintain a decent
quality of life. This is muddle-headed and disingenuous. According to a report
published in the April edition of CommonWealth Magazine last year, electricity
is extremely cheap in Taiwan compared with other countries, which goes some way
to explaining why the country is the biggest emitter of carbon per person in
Asia, and among the top 18 emitters in the world.
This is nothing to be proud of. On average, each Taiwanese produces as much as
11.8 tonnes in carbon emissions every year. Carbon emissions per person in
Taiwan have doubled since the 1990s, three times faster than the global average.
A CommonWealth online survey shows that two-thirds of Taiwanese would be willing
to pay higher energy bills if it meant wasting less energy, a conclusion borne
out by research findings.
However, another surprise awaits us if we look more closely at the cost of
electricity in Taiwan and that of other countries. On average, the cost of 1
kilowatt of electricity in Taiwan is unusually low compared to that in heavily
industrialized countries that supply their own energy needs and still have a
surplus to export, such as Canada, Dubai, France and Germany. Electricity prices
in Taiwan are only higher, or comparable, to a small number of underdeveloped,
non--industrial countries, such as Ukraine, Pakistan and Russia, suggesting that
our energy policy is stuck in a model adopted 60 years ago, when we embarked on
the process of industrialization. Consequently, we now rely on imported energy.
Taiwan long ago moved on from labor-intensive industries to finance and service
industries. Our economy, driven by research and development and innovation, is
now a knowledge economy, so why do we still employ an energy policy developed so
long ago?
Taiwanese are now very environmentally conscious and aware of the need for
sustainability. The government should exercise the utmost caution on this issue
and take a leaf from the book of other countries and the energy policies they
employ. We need to plant more trees nationwide to make this nation greener, and
to promote a more sustainable future for Taiwan and the world. This is the only
way we can wake up from this nuclear nightmare.
Peter Chang is a professor at Taipei Medical University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
|
