|
EDITORIAL: US beef:
political vs public interests
The government and the opposition parties have recently been busy trading barbs
over the issue of imports of US beef containing ractopamine residues. The
government wants to lift the ban on such imports, but is afraid to come out and
say so. Meanwhile, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and other opposition
parties, seemingly with the support of public opinion, are openly opposed to
removing the ban.
However, the question is whether the parties are really doing this in the
interests of the nation and public health. A look at the past would reveal a
very different point of view.
The liberalization of US beef imports is not a new issue. During the DPP’s time
in office, a strong effort was launched to force the deregulation of beef
imports. The administration of then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) came under
pressure from the US and the public over health concerns.
Documents released by American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson
Christopher Kavanagh on Friday showed that the DPP government intended to notify
the WTO of residue standards for drugs for animal use, including ractopamine. In
2007, the Chen administration pledged in writing to allow US beef imports, but
in the end the scope of deregulation was narrowed — with ractopamine not
included — as a result of protests by the opposition and hog farmers.
At the time, the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) opposition to deregulation
was led by then-presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). Ma criticized the DPP
government, saying it was not only unreasonable to suddenly deregulate the use
of ractopamine, but that doing so would create two separate systems — one for
beef and one for pork — which would be unfair to swine farmers and harm their
rights and interests.
That was an interesting face-off between the two parties. Power has changed
hands since then, and the two parties’ stance on the issue has seen a reversal
as well. In fact, both the current governing and opposition parties are in
agreement on the reasons for lifting the ban, but are coming at it from
different perspectives and are saying completely different things. The KMT and
the DPP both know the issue inside out, but are playing it for partisan
political advantage, setting aside considerations of public health and other
national strategic interests.
The DPP sees the government’s predicament and is twisting the knife for all it
is worth, even though this is a clear case of the pot calling the kettle black.
It’s working, too, as the government’s popularity ratings are sinking to a new
low.
At the same time, the KMT has its hands tied, unable to criticize the DPP for
pandering to populist sentiments, as it was guilty of doing exactly the same
thing several years ago. Ma may want to criticize the DPP’s behavior, but he
really doesn’t have a leg to stand on. Even though he has learned from Chen’s
experience and is trying to deal with beef and pork imports separately, he still
risks raising the ire of domestic swine farmers who are afraid he will cave in.
The issue of US beef imports is a thorny one, encompassing the Trade and
Investment Framework Agreement, visa exemptions, military procurements and even
US-Taiwan relations. Avoiding it is not an option. This is not a time for
political point-scoring. The government and the opposition need to come together
and engage in a rational debate.
Didn’t Ma want to push for talks between party leaders? Why not start with this
issue? The best policy now is for the parties to sit down together and work out
how they are to deal with this pressure from the US.
|
