|
China’s Pingtan zone
too political: MAC
FALSE ADVERTISING: The council said that while
China has been promoting the experimental zone as a cross-strait joint project,
it is not in fact sponsored by Taiwan
By Shih Hsiu-chuan / Staff Reporter
China should refrain from political overtones when promoting cross-strait
cooperation on Pingtan Island because more than 80 percent of Taiwanese reject
China’s “one country, two systems” formula, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC)
said yesterday.
The formula governed the return of former British colony Hong Kong to Chinese
rule after 1997, in which the territory was allowed to keep its capitalist
economy and British common law traditions for 50 years, while Beijing controls
all foreign and defense policy.
Stopping short of saying that the government discourages investment in the
Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental Zone, located on Pingtan Island in China’s
Fujian Province, the council reminded Taiwanese that it is not a “co-pilot”
project sponsored by the Taiwanese government.
The council issued the statement yesterday ahead of the departure today by a
delegation of government officials, to be led by Straits Exchange Foundation
Vice Chairman Kao Koong-lian (高孔廉), for a seven-day visit to southeastern China,
including a tour of the zone.
Developed by China’s Fujian Provincial Government to become a pilot area for
cross-strait cooperation, the Pingtan project is the centerpiece of Beijing’s
West-Taiwan Strait Economic Zone plan, which has won the backing of China’s
State Council.
Fujian Governor Su Shulin (蘇樹林) said on Wednesday that Pingtan is expected to
receive more than 260 billion yuan (US$41 billion) in Chinese government
subsidies over the next five years for infrastructure development.
China has put too much of a political overtone into the Pingtan project, which
in fact was designed in accordance with its “12th five-year plan” that handles
cross-strait relationships under the principle of the “one country, two systems”
formula, council spokesman Liu Te-shun (劉德勳) said yesterday.
It has been proven by survey results over a long period that Taiwanese oppose
the “one country, two systems” formula, he said.
While the Chinese have been promoting Pingtan as a cross-strait “co-pilot”
project with five aspects — joint planning, joint development, cooperation,
joint management and joint benefits — those were “not the facts,” Liu said.
The development of Pingtan would get better results if China focused on economic
aspects and “removed unnecessary political factors,” he added.
Taiwanese-based engineering consultants have participated in the design of the
project and some Taiwanese have been recruited, but that did not mean that it is
the Taiwanese government’s policy to cooperate with China on the project, Liu
said.
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Kao Charng (高長) said that the major
difference between the Pingtan project and other special economic areas in China
was that China has “made blatant moves” to promote the project and it has
“expedient political purposes.”
“It’s fine, [China] can do whatever it likes, but we can’t let it mislead people
in Taiwan that it [the project] has the consent of our government,” Kao said.
The council said it was not discouraging people from investing in Pingtan
Island.
“We simply want people to have a better understanding about the project and make
a thorough risk assessment,” Liu said.
Meanwhile, the Central News Agency yesterday quoted an unnamed Ministry of
Economic Affairs official as saying that the Investment Commission would review
applications for planned investment in Pingtan by Taiwanese businesses on a
case-by-case basis.
The official said the reviews would take into account the potential impact of
the investment in Pingtan on Taiwan in terms of economic and non-economic
factors. If necessary, the ministry would consult with the relevant government
agencies before reaching its final conclusion, the official added.
Additional reporting by staff writer
|
