20130912 Wang ¡¥sad¡¦ over KMT¡¦s decision, aims to repeal it
Prev Up Next

¡@

Wang ¡¥sad¡¦ over KMT¡¦s decision, aims to repeal it

By Shih Hsiu-chuan / Staff reporter


Supporters of Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng chant slogans and hold signs outside the Chinese Nationalist Party¡¦s (KMT) Taipei headquarters yesterday.
Photo: Mandy Cheng / AFP


Branding himself a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) member ¡§forever and ever,¡¨ Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (¤ýª÷¥­) yesterday took legal action as he sought to invalidate a party ruling that revoked his membership.

The 72-year-old Wang, who has served as a lawmaker since he was 34, said he was ¡§sad¡¨ about the decision because the KMT was like a ¡§mother¡¨ to him, but added that he was facing the situation ¡§calmly.¡¨

Wang, a KMT legislator-at-large, has vowed to appeal to retain his membership, which, if revoked, will force him to forfeit his post as a lawmaker.

The KMT¡¦s Central Evaluation and Discipline Committee yesterday withdrew Wang¡¦s membership over his alleged involvement in illegally lobbying on behalf of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislative caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (¬_«Ø»Ê) in a legal case.

Wang denies any wrongdoing.

A few hours after the decision was made, the committee promptly delivered the document to the Central Election Commission (CEC) in order to invoke the necessary procedures to nullify Wang¡¦s membership.

After receiving the notice, the election commission sent a letter to the legislature, as required by Article 73 of the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (¤½Â¾¤H­û¿ïÁ|½}§Kªk), in the evening to ask it to revoke Wang¡¦s status as a lawmaker, CEC Vice Chairman Liu I-chou (¼B¸q©P) said.

The act does not specify how long the legislature will take to complete the procedure, but the CEC said it would name a KMT legislator-at-large to replace Wang within 15 days of receiving the legislature¡¦s reply, Liu said.

Wang yesterday offered an apology to the public, saying he was sorry that former minister of justice Tseng Yung-fu (´¿«i¤Ò) resigned over the incident and for the disturbances caused to society.

However, he also acted quickly to defend his standing in the party.

Former DPP lawmaker and attorney Chiu Tai-san (ªô¤Ó¤T) filed an injunction against the revocation with the Taipei District Court, as well as a civil lawsuit seeking to overrule the KMT¡¦s decision.

Chiu said that submitting an appeal to the KMT alone was not sufficient to prevent the party from rescinding Wang¡¦s membership and suggested that the legislative speaker seek other judicial means to avoid irreparably damaging his legal rights.

Wang said he was considering bringing another civil lawsuit against the KMT to reverse his expulsion.

Chiu said that former KMT lawmaker Hsu Shu-po (³\µÎ³Õ), who was expelled by the party because of his involvement in a legal case, had filed an injunction against the party and had his membership reinstated in 2011.

The decision to expel Wang has aroused anger among several KMT members.

In Greater Kaohsiung, Wang¡¦s hometown, 11 KMT borough wardens withdrew from the party to voice their discontent with his ejection.

KMT Legislator Chen Ken-te (³¯®Ú¼w) said the party was doomed to fail in future elections because by expelling Wang ¡X who is favored by KMT pro-localization factions ¡X it had shown that President Ma Ying-jeou (°¨­^¤E) was eager to distance the party from pro-localization forces.

Former Taipei EasyCard Corp (±y¹C¥d¤½¥q) chairman Sean Lien (³s³Ó¤å), the eldest son of former KMT chairman Lien Chan (³s¾Ô), paid a visit to Wang in his legislative office, saying that whether the speaker was guilty in the influence-peddling case should be decided by a court, not a handful of people ¡X an apparent reference to the KMT disciplinary committee.

¡§We are living in the 102th year of the Republic of China, not in the Ming Dynasty. No one in the country is above the law,¡¨ Sean Lien said.

His comments appeared to be a reference to a Ming-era intelligence unit known as Dong Chang (ªF¼t), which had the power to spy on court officials, the gentry, academics and the army, and reported directly to the emperor. The unit could also arrest and interrogate such people if authorized to do so by the emperor.

Additional reporting by Jake Chung

 Prev Next