以下為CNN原文參考資料,與宋友會的密函,相信宋楚瑜先生的為人亦非如是之人!
Shifting alliances shape Taiwan
status
November 21, 2001 By Willy Wo-Lap Lam
(CNN) -- The Chinese leadership has adopted a multi-pronged strategy to ensure that it will benefit from upcoming parliamentary elections in Taiwan.
Beijing's best-case scenario is that the pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party's
(DPP) tenuous grip on the Legislative Yuan will slip further.
The DPP holds only 66 out of 225 legislative seats, meaning most of President Chen Shui-bian's policies are routinely blocked. Chen has vowed to boost his party's legislative positions to at least 87.
And Chen ally, former president Lee Teng-hui, has formed a Taiwan Solidarity Union
(TSU) which, in Beijing's view, is also gunning for covert independence.
Beijing hopes to prevent the TSU from gaining enough seats to join forces with DPP politicians and independents to control the legislature.
At the same time, the administration of President Jiang Zemin has quietly thrown its support behind the two major opposition parties, the Kuomintang
(KMT) and the People's First Party (PFP), many of whose politicians have visited Beijing the past year.
Behind closed doors
In closed-door meetings with KMT stalwarts, Beijing cadres have pledged to give them political and other kinds of support to ensure the DPP掇 defeat at the polls.
Beijing's Taiwan gameplan has been summed up by a Communist party Politburo member in a terse dictum:“be as tough -- or as conciliatory -- as the situation requires.”
For the past year, Beijing has been ruthlessly wielding the “business card”against the
DPP.
The mainland leadership's strategy is simple. Firstly, roll out the red carpet to Taiwan companies, particularly hi-tech firms.
As Taiwan's economy becomes more reliant upon the mainland, not only businessmen but professionals and fresh college graduates see their future well-being in Shanghai, Xiamen or
Dongguan, Guangdong Province.
Secondly, establish the link between Taiwan's economic woes and the sorry state of its relations with the mainland.
Thirdly, continue the policy of snubbing President Chen - and laying the blame for mainland-Taiwan tension squarely on Chen and his DPP colleagues.
Turning heat on Chen
So far, things seem to be going Beijing's way. Unlike predecessor Lee, Chen has been unable to prevent the flow of capital -- and talents -- to coastal China.
Latest statistics -- the GDP shrinking by four per cent in the third quarter and unemployment up to 5.3% -- have raised the specter of long-term hardship.
While a major cause of the recession has been the downturn in the American and world economy, it is easy for
anti-DPP forces to play up Chen's failings.
Since early this year, the KMT and PFP have trained their firepower on Chen掇 apparent failure to open a dialogue with Beijing - and presumably to get enough mainland business to resuscitate Taiwan.
The Jiang leadership掇 business card has become more effective after both the mainland and Taiwan have entered the World Trade Organization.
A number of Taiwan transportation firms, including four aviation companies, have already committed sizeable investments in the mainland in anticipation of direct air and shipping links.
And Beijing doesn's need to do much to persuade Taiwan businesses to put pressure on Chen to make concessions on the cross-Strait front, such as recognizing the one China principle.
Taiwan public unmoved
A source close to Beijing's Taiwan policy establishment said the Jiang administration had earmarked billions of yuan for investments in Taiwan should the three direct links be established.
As more Taiwan businessmen and workers become dependent on the mainland, Taipei's economic sovereignty - and ability to determine its own destiny - may be dealt a body blow.
“Since multi-party elections began in Taiwan in the mid-1980s, this is the first time that economics has become a dominant issue,”the source said.
“Beijing is confident that the momentum is going its way because the mainland economy is thriving while that of Taiwan is deteriorating.”
Diplomatic analysts say Beijing has encountered more difficulties in efforts to woo the Taiwan public through assuming an open and flexible posture on the reunification issue.
In the run-up to Taiwan's presidential elections in 1996 and 2000, Beijing hurt its own cause - and indirectly helped its foes, Lee and Chen - by issuing dire threats to the island's electorate.
Witness the war games off the Taiwan coast in 1996 and Premier Zhu Rongji掇 tough message in March 2000 that a vote for the DDP was the moral equivalent of a ballot for war.
Diplomatic wrangling
This time around, Beijing has exercised relative restraint and focused on waging some form of smile diplomacy.
For example, both Jiang and Vice-Premier Qian Qichen have emphasized that as long as Taipei recognizes the one China principle, anything - including the title, flag and anthem of the new, reunited China - is negotiable.
Officers of the People's Liberation Army have also been told not to make provocative remarks about the“renegade province.”
There was, however, a major mishap last month, when the hardline Foreign Minister Tang
Jiaxuan, almost repeated the errors of 1996 and 2000.
At the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum in Shanghai, Tang caused widespread indignation in Taiwan by refusing to let Taipei's representative, Economics Minister Lin
Hsin-yi, reply to a reporter's question at a press conference.
Tang also alienated a good chunk of Taiwan's voters by delivering a bitter attack on Chen in his speech at the United Nations General Assembly earlier this month.
“I despise Chen Shui-bian because all that he says are lies,” Tang said.
Chinese sources in Beijing said Tang received an indirect reprimand from Qian for his impolite - and totally undiplomatic - treatment of Lin in Shanghai.
At a high-level meeting to reassess APEC, Qian told Tang it was essential to follow the policy of being tough when toughness is required - and being conciliatory when the situation so demands.
And the part of Tang's UN speech that savaged Chen was not reported in the official Chinese media.
The big question: will Beijing's elaborate strategies pay off on election day, December 1?
Taiwan analysts say much depends on whether the DPP can hold on to the loyalty of the 30% or so of the electorate that has always cast their ballots for pro-independence, native-Taiwanese candidates.
Chen and his colleagues are facing a tough test because the majority of long-standing DPP supporters live in southern Taiwan, which is hardest hit by unemployment and other woes.
However, Chen's strategists have claimed that economics will not triumph over politics -- at least not in the case of proud native-Taiwanese residents who have over the decades denied alien powers ranging from the Japanese to the mainlanders.
The chances of Chen and Lee retaining the backing of native-Taiwanese voters may rise if cadres such as Tang were to let their desire to gloat over the mainland掇 growing prowess get in the way of reassuring Taiwan it will not be swallowed up in the wake of the tricky business of reunification.