台灣媒體之獨厚新黨某些立委，皆有目共睹，此乃同情弱者？非也！此乃有些重量級媒體人物，有大中國情結，這些被台灣人視為不吉人物，其擁有之市場，是由媒體暴力所滋長而來。言論自由不表示思想自由，媒體運作其文宣武器，先前製作前題預設的框框，問答或民調，要聽眾進入框框思惟，自由選擇預設之解答，自然在無形剝削自由思考的思想自由。

　　台灣雖有民主化的表面事實，其言論自由乃只是爭逐於大眾傳播媒體的發言權，而忽視真正小眾大多人民的聲音，以極少數比例的媒體傳佈，控制台灣民眾的想法與思想教育，是一種媒體暴力。在未成熟的民主國家，這種大眾媒體暴力可以左右民眾的自由思惟，而引導到思想桎梏的死胡同，形成不成熟低俗反民主暴動。

　　媒體的素質若不提高，其內容若不能中庸平和，主播的狂妄添加火氣，就會是災難的伏筆，媒體有責任挖掘真相，但是真相是否為真相，則需台灣人民民主素質的判斷。

　　台灣媒體工作者，因其出生背景所染，明知自由民主是台灣的進化，但是在某些因素影響，偏狹性的報導，滲入太多大中國主義的色彩。捧國民黨風潮過去了，現在暗助中共的對台統戰，於各種聲、光、刊、色之中，加入五顏六色的好共、哈共、朝共的精神，某些反民主、反台灣人思想的代表，立即成為某些媒體的寵兒！

　　中共到現在講一套、做一套，有時講二、三套，只做終絕的一套，依中共的計劃，台灣經濟衰到一定程度，中共必然有所動作，而台商被吸到一定程度，中共亦會有所運作。中共要適時攻台，會先武嚇而和談，於和平中產生震憾性的滅台行動，以使得美國、日本皆無法保台。

　　中共先巴結所需，俟對方衰弱無礙之後，有突發的舉動，這是親和與致命的二手方式。解放軍隨時備戰，其演習是障眼法，而暗中做大規模的M族攻台飛彈，則是事實。看報導吧！

Chinese missile moves near Taiwan worry U.S.

By Bill Gertz
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

China is mobilizing some of its short-range missiles near Taiwan as other military forces are engaged in the largest war games in five years, according to U.S. intelligence officials.

The missile activity at two bases across the Taiwan Strait is raising concerns inside the Pentagon that China's military may be set for test missile firings at Taiwan -- similar to 1996 missile flight tests that led to a U.S.-China confrontation.

According to officials with access to U.S. intelligence reports, a U.S. spy satellite photographed several CSS-6 missiles at a base in Fujian province that was used for training exercises in the past but is normally left unoccupied.

Two transporter-erector launchers loaded with CSS-6s were spotted in the open at the training base. Six others were in sheds and an unspecified number of other missiles were hidden under camouflage nearby, the officials said.

"The missile unit occupied a base that is only used for training," said one official. The exact location of the missile training base could not be confirmed. One official said it was located at Fuzhou, directly across the strait from Taipei.

China has built several missile bases in Fujian province over the past several years, including the two newest ones at Xianyou and Yongan. The regional command headquarters for the short-range missile forces is located at Leping.

U.S. intelligence agencies reported in March that a new base for CSS-7 short-range missiles was completed at Xianyou -- about 135 miles across the Taiwan Strait from the island. Additionally, part of a CSS-7 brigade recently left another base opposite Taiwan for a mobile deployment exercise, the officials said.

The missiles are among the more than 300 CSS-6s and CSS-7s, also known as M-9s and M-11s, that China has deployed opposite Taiwan in the past several years. Administration national security officials have said China plans to deploy up to 600 missiles at bases opposite Taiwan.

The Pentagon views the continuing, large-scale missile deployment as destabilizing. The weapons can attack all of Taiwan's military bases with little or no warning, according to a recent Defense Intelligence Agency assessment.

A Chinese government-owned newspaper in Hong Kong, Wen Wei Po, reported earlier this week that the "large-scale" beach landing exercises centered on Dongshan island will involve 100,000 troops, along with naval and air forces.

The last time Chinese forces conducted a similar amphibious landing exercise was November 1995, the newspaper said.

As part of that exercise, Chinese missile forces fired several short-range missiles in provocative flight tests that hit waters near the northern and southern tips of Taiwan.

A respected nongovernment Hong Kong newspaper, Ming Pao, reported Tuesday that the exercise had begun with "tens of thousands" troops from several regions near Fujian province moving toward Dongshan island. It said the war games would continue for two weeks.

"It is pointed out that the main aim of the exercise will be to attack and occupy Taiwan's offshore islands and counterattack U.S. military intervention," the newspaper stated.

Commercial aircraft were routed around Dongshan, and Chinese marines had taken control of the ferry between the island and mainland.

One source told the newspaper that the exercise involved electronic warfare operations, and that the Chinese military for the first time was using reconnaissance satellites and satellite navigation systems.

The exercise reportedly kicked off Monday night with an airborne assault on Dongshan.

In reaction to the 1996 missile tests, the Pentagon dispatched two aircraft carrier battle groups to waters near Taiwan in a show of force.

China reacted by building up its military capability to attack U.S. ships, including the purchase of two Russian Sovremenny-class guided-missile destroyers equipped with SSN-22 supersonic anti-ship missiles.

Until the recent missile activity, Pentagon spokesmen have downplayed a series of Chinese military exercises taking place along China's coasts.

The first exercises took place on Woody island in the South China Sea, where China has built an airstrip for projecting its power into strategic sea lanes. Several thousand Chinese marines, accompanied by several warships, stormed ashore on the island as part of maneuvers last week.

While the Woody island war games were under way, China's northern navy conducted a sudden dispersal exercise that is normally conducted before a military attack or for protecting ships in port from bad weather.

Then in what officials called "phase two" of regional war games, the Chinese began massing more than 200 amphibious warfare vehicles on Dongshan island.

The official Chinese military newspaper also reported this week that a Chinese bomber division practiced low-level bombing runs May 28 as part of another exercise.

Also, Wen Wei Po quoted an unidentified Chinese military source as saying the Dongshan exercise will employ "advanced fighter planes, warships, missiles and electronic-warfare equipment."

The source also told the government-owned newspaper that the war games are practice for testing new tactics and for "quickly launching and winding up a war."

It also will help troops study "ways of applying new-type equipment and translating new type equipment into fighting capacity through real operations."

Some Pentagon officials believe the war games could be preparation for military action by Chinese forces against an outlying Taiwanese island, or as part of sabre-rattling designed to intimidate the Taipei government.

Sun Yuxi, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman, said Tuesday in Beijing that the war games are routine and normal.

 

2001.06.08／聯合新聞網特派記者張聖岱北京報導

中共：回到一中 可談撤福建飛彈

　　中共外交部發言人孫玉璽昨天表示，中共在福建部署飛彈，是主權範圍內的事，不容其他國家干涉；如果台灣回到「一個中國」原則，兩岸可以談判撤除福建飛彈問題。

　　孫玉璽在外交部記者會上回答本報記者提問，在「一中」原則下，大陸是否願意提取在福建大量部署的飛彈時，孫玉璽表示，中共一直希望兩岸間建立信任措施，緩和兩岸局勢。只要台灣回到「一個中國」原則，任何問題都可以談，當然包括飛彈部署的問題。

　　他說，中共在台灣問題上是要實行和平統一，積極促進兩岸人員交流、合作，積極促進兩岸關係緩和，不願看到引起台灣海峽緊張的事件發生；不過，對一些挑釁活動，中共也要有所準備。

　　不過，對於共軍在東山島的軍事演習，孫玉璽仍表示是例常演練。

 

2001.06.08／聯合新聞網記者楊羽雯台北報導

　　對中共外交部表示台灣回到「一個中國原則」兩岸可就撤除福建飛彈問題進行談判，陸委會高層官員指出，這不過是另一個語言的陷阱。江澤民已說過，在一中原則下，國旗國號都可以談，相較之下，撤飛彈並不是什麼太大的誘餌。而這樣的說法，不過再次凸顯中共不放棄武力解決台灣問題的立場。

　　陸委會官員指出，一九九二年兩岸談文書驗證時，大陸方面就是強調要在協議中，加入「一個中國原則」六個字，雙方談判沒有結果，後來談判被導向如何表述「一個中國」，雙方才共同提出十三個方案，不過還是沒有共識，結果雙方達成各自以口頭表述「一個中國」的結論。現在，中共又拿各種誘因要我方接受「一個中國原則」六個字，情況等於回到九二年。

 

　　中共講的一個中國是消滅中華民國，而一國兩制是要控制亞洲命脈的台灣戰略點，先吸乾台灣的財富，就可以不理會台灣人反應，立可弱台、滅台與亡台。美國人發現 Clinton 主政以來，被中共騙的程度多不勝舉，中共暗中發展殺手衛星，又積極要訂定太空和平計劃，小布希現在警覺到中共的厲害與其全球戰略的成功。不久之後，知道美國必須嘗到惡果。

　　台灣現在依靠民主制度的美國，自然比令台灣人民與中華民國害怕的中共好太多。中共對台灣的民主貢獻是負成長，而台灣人對中共的經濟奉獻，則是高標準級的助長。台灣人的確有偉大之處，可以犧牲小我（台灣）而完成大我（中國），台灣人的精神可以到中國稱頌為仙為神了。

　　現在美國人嚇得有點尿急，故已經加緊其TMD、NMD計劃，與NATO、蘇俄等國加緊遊說工作。看報導：

 

Rumsfeld Promotes Missile Defense

Thursday June 7 11:13 AM ET
By JEFFREY ULBRICH, Associated Press Writer

BRUSSELS, Belgium (AP) - Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, armed with graphic aids and fresh evidence of a growing security threat from unpredictable nations, pushed the anti-ballistic missile defense to NATO allies Thursday.

But he faced skepticism on the first day of a two-day defense ministers meeting at the NATO headquarters.

"Our lack of defenses against ballistic missiles creates incentives for missile proliferation which, combined with the development of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction, give future adversaries the ability to hold our populations hostage to terror and blackmail,"' Rumsfeld told the allies.

It's unlikely Rumsfeld will make any more headway in bringing the allies around to Washington's view than Secretary of State Colin Powell was able to do last week at a NATO foreign ministers meeting in Budapest, Hungary.

And he faces an even more skeptical Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov on Friday during a meeting of the NATO-Russia Permanent Joint Council.

"We're going to keep talking to our allies,'' Rumsfeld told reporters Wednesday, suggesting no breakthrough is on the horizon. "We're going to talk to our friends. We're going to talk to the People's Republic of China, and we'll keep moving this along.''

Lord Robertson, the NATO secretary-general, said the gathering in Brussels was ``an important opportunity for allies to consult about the direction of U.S. thinking before any decisions are made.''

"Responding to today's challenges means discussing not only new U.S. thinking, but also developing European thinking,'' he said.

The allies also were discussing the situation in the Balkans, where NATO leads more than 60,000 troops on peacekeeping missions in Kosovo and Bosnia, Macedonia, NATO-Russia relations, and the 19-nation alliance's cooperation with the emerging defense arm of the European Union.

But missiles, clearly, will be uppermost on everybody's mind.

Washington wants to develop and deploy a system that will protect the United States and its allies from ballistic missiles fired by what it calls "nations of concern.'' Exactly what kind of system that might be has yet to be determined.

Many of the allies fail to see a real threat. Many who do believe that the solution is political, not military. Others fear abandoning the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty between the United States and Russia would be detrimental to overall European security. The Americans believe the ABM treaty has outlived its usefulness.

"We understand this conclusion is not welcomed by some," Rumsfeld said in his presentation to the allies. "It is simply inescapable."

The secretary laid out the threat Washington sees from nations like North Korea, Iran and Iraq, in some cases illustrating actual deployment of missiles capable of reaching allied territory.

"Rogue states are acquiring ballistic missiles and weapons of mass destruction," he said. Biotechnology, robotics, and high density energy sources "are putting unprecedented power in the hands of small countries and terrorist groups."

He said the United States believes that besides having a retaliatory nuclear and conventional strike capability, the allies need to develop short, medium and long-range missile defenses to dissuade a potential enemy from launching an attack.

These defenses will be deployed against "handfuls of missiles, not hundreds," he said, adding that the United States intends to press ahead with testing a wide array of missile defense technologies.

French Defense Minister Alain Richard said the allies are "in a listening phase" of consultations with the United States.

German Defense Minister Rudolf Scharping said there needs to be a coherent political answer to the threats. "Technological means alone are not sufficient," he said.

Both Rumsfeld and Robertson plan to confront the allies with their lagging progress on the program adopted at the NATO summit in Washington two years ago to upgrade and modernize military capability.

While all maintain their pledge to do so, few are devoting sufficient resources to the effort.

"Unless the nations around this table develop and maintain the necessary defense capabilities, the ability of our governments to respond to political calls for military action - whether through NATO or indeed through the EU or elsewhere - will be severely limited."