Dear Mr. Chancellor Gerhard Schr(der,
Mr. Secretary-General George Robertson,
Under "one country", Taiwan could never be guaranteed peace, because Beijing
continue to reserve the right to use deadly force against its own citizens. And under the
"two systems", Beijing is explicitly trying to limit the spread of freedom in
China itself.
If Taiwan wants to preserve its peace, prosperity, and freedom, the best guaranteed is
either side of Taiwan Strait step into democracy and freedom society.
Taiwan's current policy does not preclude eventual unification, but it
definitely precludes unification under current circumstances.
If and when Beijing modifies is constitution and legal system reconstructially
liberalizes its politics, only then should the people on Taiwan and their elected
representatives could discuss potential frameworks for unification.
Taipei has tried to focus the agenda for meetings on functional and practical issue
like the security of tourists and businessmen or management of fishing boats. Beijing's
approach has stalled, and will continue to stall with its powerful position to force
Taipei accept "one China" statement. The same attitude acted its work in US-PRC
WTO agreement.
In general speaking, democratic countries have few experiences in take with
communist China, because the dilemma in Chinese communist could confuse the style of
western nations.
Taipei cannot change its real state position to betray Taiwanese
people. So, it only "wait" and asked for support from democratic countries
especial on the hope of Japan and United States.
Democratic Taiwan cannot sacrifice over Beijing's military force and
anti-democratic way of terrorism, keep Taiwan on going to real democracy,
and educated Taiwanese people democratic lessons, that related with human rights and
obeying the law could increased in internal stability and gained the respects from other
countries.
Nevertheless, democratic Taiwan could be weakened by democratic system over
the defense on military threat from communist China. Beijing only wants to
talk with Taipei under the one China precondition. Beijing frequently claims
that it must reserve the right to use force against Taiwan in order to protect China's
sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Beijing's current policy does not promote peace, prosperity, and freedom for Taiwan or
China. It threatens force and inhibits the rights of Taiwan's people to effective
representation in international society --- even for disaster relief.
Washington's current policy fails to promote peace, prosperity and freedom on both
sides of the Taiwan Strait. The adoption of a one China policy that is
indistinguishable from Beijing's had led Washington to implement policies that limit the
ability and freedom of Taiwan's people to contribute to and benefit from international
organizations.
In our view, Clinton's policy may be good for mainland China, but fails to promote peace
by appeasing rather than deterring military aggression in the Taiwan Strait.
Taiwan, an island of hope, is all Chinese people's wishes. Taiwanese people
lived in prosperity, freedom, and democracy. We can criticize our political leaders,
believe we want to follow; that whole projects are under people's surveillance.
Democratic Taiwan is worth supporting.