Taiwan’s
representative to the United States Stephen Chen, attacked Taiwan’s
sovereignty. … Why?
Friday, Dec. 31 1999 ---
Taiwan’s representative to the United States, Stephen Chen,
recently returned to Taiwan. He reported on current Taiwan-U.S.
relations to the Legislative Yuan. According to him, the ground of
mutual trust between Taiwan and the United States has been undermined
because our government announced, without consulting the United States
in advance, that cross-strait relations are special “state-to-state”
relations.
The “two-states” theory has become the supreme guideline of
Taiwan’s foreign policy. Not only has President Lee Teng-hui
reaffirmed such a principle, but the Ministry of Foreign Affairs also
has included the spirit of this theory in official documents. For
instance, this year MOFA’s document claiming Taiwan’s right to join
the United Nations emphasized that Taiwan and China have been ruled by
two “distinct and separate” governments. The two-states theory is
crucial to Taiwan’s long-term survival and development. It
defines not only cross-strait relations but also Taiwan’s
self-identity. It therefore has won support from the majority of the
Taiwanese people.
The two-states theory has gained much support from the U.S. Congress
and has received good press, despite opposed by the administration of
U.S. President Bill Clinton. As a diplomat of Taiwan, Chen should
use all the friendly strength he can muster to fight for our national
interests. He should not openly convey messages against our national principles. His words are likely to be
used by the pro-China people as an excuse to attack Taiwan.
Chen’s criticism of President Lee Teng-hui in not consulting the
United States in advance is even more ridiculous. Is he a diplomat of
Taiwan or of the United States? The nature of cross-strait
relations is a matter of sovereignty. Taiwan has no obligation to ask
American approval. We are certainly searching for American
understanding, since the cross-strait relationship is related to U.S.
interests. However, considering the weakness of Clinton’s China
policy, consulting the United States in advance would only raise
obstacles for Taiwan to its declare national sovereignty. Without the
two-states theory, Taiwan would eventually be trapped into the
“one-China” and “three-nos” policies and be forced to accept
into the “one China, two systems” formula. Chen, as a
representative of Taiwan to the United States, is doing nothing to fight
for Taiwan’s sovereignty and dignity but instead criticizing his own
country in not asking approval from the United States in the first
place. Chen’s behavior is humiliating to his country.
His attitude and professionalism are both questionable. The Ministry
of Foreign Affairs should replace him immediately.