| 
 Trade 
on June 27, 2004 Trade 
remains first `weapon' for China DISINCENTIVES: 
Commentators argue that Beijing is moving away from the use of economic carrots 
and toward using a bit more stick to bring Taiwan into line China's threats to place 
economic sanctions on Taiwan are part of a strategy to divide and conquer, but 
will only be realized if Taiwan moves closer to independence, analysts say.  "This is part of a traditional united-front strategy to use the 
business community to surround the government and to mobilize the people to 
exert pressure on the independence forces," said Joseph Cheng , a China 
expert at the City University of Hong Kong.  China employed the strategy in reverse throughout the 1990s, offering 
lucrative economic incentives to Taiwanese businesses in the belief that the 
more investment flowed from Taiwan, the greater the possibility of 
reunification, he said.  Similar tactics were also widely used to smooth over Hong Kong's handover 
to China in 1997.  But with the re-election of President Chen Shui-bian in March, China has 
apparently decided it must now use disincentives to attract support for 
reunification.  In the last week, a number of Beijing academics have been calling for 
economic sanctions to be put in place against Taiwanese independence forces. The 
government has said that investment from pro-independence businessmen is not 
welcome.  Wang Jianmin , a Taiwan specialist at the Chinese Academy of Social 
Sciences, said that if economic sanctions against Taiwan were imposed, they 
would involve limiting or even banning imports.  "Taiwan's overseas trade sector would be the first to suffer and see a 
one-third drop in its exports, then the manufacturing and production sector 
would be hit, causing mass shutdowns among these firms and a major economic 
recession," he was quoted as saying by the state-run China Daily.  When contacted by reporters, Wang refused to detail what specific legal 
measures Beijing could use to impose such economic sanctions, nor whether it 
would invoke state security laws to achieve its goal.  "It is still not clear what the mainland plans to do, but it is likely 
to be calibrated to the actual situation," Cheng said.  "If Chen Shui-bian moves closer toward independence, they will step up 
the pressure and maybe attack suspect Taiwan businessmen, but if he backs down 
then things will probably go on as normal," he said.  Taiwan has been a major engine of China's economic growth with over US$70 
billion invested in the Chinese economy.  Indirect trade between Taiwan and China rose 23.8 percent year-on-year to 
US$46.32 billion last year.  After naming suspect businessmen and companies, Beijing would probably seek 
to influence their share prices through attacks in the media, Cheng said.  "China would also refuse to approve any investment projects on the 
mainland by any suspect companies," he said.  China, though, would probably avoid confiscating investment or arresting 
suspect Taiwanese investors under its murky state security laws, which are 
routinely used to jail political dissidents and suspected separatists.  "They won't use arrests or jailing under the national security laws, 
because that would be just too scary and the reaction in Taiwan would make such 
moves counter-productive," Cheng said.  China has a history of using economic sanctions in political disputes, 
including unannounced sanctions against French companies following the sale of 
Mirage fighter jets to Taiwan in the early 1990s.  In recent years, both Credit Suisse First Boston and Japan's Matsushita 
have been temporarily blacklisted for falling foul of Beijing's Taiwan policy.  Trading house Jardine Matheson was long out of favor with China over its 
support for democratic reform in Hong Kong during the lead-up to the 1997 
transfer of power.      
  |