Weeping
woman disrupts Ma apology
PARENTS ARRESTED: Yao Mu-chi
said her mother was tortured to death and her father imprisoned for 10 years on
wrongful charges of spying for China’s government
By Ko Shu-ling
STAFF REPORTER
Wednesday, Jul 16, 2008, Page 3
|
Yao Mu-chi, who said her
parents were persecuted during the White Terror era, protests as
President Ma Ying-jeou addressed the audience at a memorial service for
the victims of the White Terror yesterday. Yao said her family was
ruined as a result of the White Terror and that the Chinese Nationalist
Party (KMT) should use party assets to compensate them.
|
Despite having apologized to victims of the White Terror era, President
Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was interrupted yesterday at a memorial event marking the
21st anniversary of the lifting of martial law by a tearful protester.
A member of the audience, Yao Mu-chi (姚沐棋), drew the attention of cameras
shortly after Ma began his speech addressing the memorial service at the
Chiehshou Park monument commemorating political prisoners held during the
Martial Law era.
Cameramen turned from Ma’s speech to Yao in the back row as she aired her
grievances.
Security personnel approached the 61-year-old, who responded: “You have no right
to ask me to leave.”
“This is a free country and I have an invitation. I have every right to sit
here,” she said.
A man in the audience joined in, applauding and shouting: “KMT bastard!”
She challenged authorities to arrest her and put her in jail: “What do I care?
My hair is already gray.”
FAMILY TRAGEDY
In tears, Yao said the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government had wrongfully
convicted her parents and ruined the lives of her and her entire family.
Yao said her parents, both journalists, were accused of spying for the Chinese
Communist Party. Her mother, who was convicted without a trial, died of torture
85 days after being arrested, Yao said.
Her father, also convicted of spying, served 10 years in jail, Yao said.
Yao said she and her two older sisters were labeled as the “daughters of spies”
and blocked from promotions at work and from taking national examinations for
civil servants.
TRAUMA
Yao said she was so traumatized at the time that she was admitted to a
psychiatric ward for six months.
Yao said her family received some compensation from the government later, but
that the money should not have come from taxpayers but rather from the KMT’s
assets.
While Yao recounted her story, Ma went on with his speech, saying freedom was
more important than seeing eye to eye with him.
He ended his talk with a bow and an apology, saying that he hoped political
persecution would never happen on this soil again.
CONCERNED
Ma said that although this was the first memorial he had attended in his
capacity as president, it was not the first he had attended as a politician,
adding that he had long been concerned with the nation’s history.
Ma said that even in today’s democratic society he had personally been targeted
with wrongful allegations, citing the corruption charges brought against him
over the use of his special allowance fund as Taipei mayor.
The situation was even worse 40 or 50 years ago when the rule of law was still
in its infancy, Ma said.
Ma said that martial law had been imposed because of the civil war between the
KMT and the Chinese Communist Party and that without the civil war, there would
not have been any human rights violations.
Comment by Taiwan
228 Movement Net Radio Commentary by Taiwan 228 Movement Net Radio: More than 60 years after the February 28th incident, the KMT’s ruling elite class has yet to give a formal apology to the victims and their descendants. The incident, unfortunately, has also begun to be forgotten by the Taiwanese. We think this is sad. And we ask all of our audience, both domestic and international, to visit the Tati Foundation’s website, which is dedicated to Taiwan’s great predecessors, who sacrificed for the democracy that we, at Taiwan, all enjoy today. Please visit Tati Foundation at http://www.taiwantt.org.tw Also at http://228.net.tw/ |
TSU leader
pans plan to remove investment caps
STAFF WRITER, WITH CNA
Wednesday, Jul 16, 2008, Page 3
The government’s plan to remove the current investment caps on China-bound
investment projects by Taiwanese firms is only aimed at bailing out a small
number of companies and will damage the economy, the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU)
said yesterday.
TSU Secretary-General Lin Chi-chia (林志嘉) said the plan to lift the caps would
undermine the nation’s economic independence.
“If the barrier is removed by the government, at least NT$2 trillion [US$65.8
billion] in Taiwanese capital ... will flee to China,” Lin said.
“The TSU will lead the public to the streets if the administration of President
Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) insists on adopting such a measure,” he said.
Citing statistics compiled by the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Lin said that 52
Taiwan-based companies had exceeded the investment cap, while another 110
enterprises were near the limit.
Lin said most of these companies were debt-ridden as a result of unsuccessful
investments in China.
At a separate setting yesterday, former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) said the
government was locking the country away from the rest of the world by betting
too much on China.
“The government has no global outlook and has eyes for China alone, ” Lu said.
Comment by Taiwan
228 Movement Net Radio Commentary by Taiwan 228 Movement Net Radio: Indeed, Ma and his cronies only had eyes for China alone. The so-called “ international perspective” hailed by the administration is nothing but a joke. |
Don’t be in
such a rush to destroy the economy
By Jason Liu 劉進興
Wednesday, Jul 16, 2008, Page 8
In an attempt to revive Taiwan’s struggling stock market, President Ma Ying-jeou
(馬英九) said on July 10 that restrictions on chip investment in China would be
relaxed. But this “good news” could severely hurt the economy.
Ma said Intel is building a 12-inch wafer factory in Dalian that will use
90-nanometer technology. He said the Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Control for
Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies allows high-tech transfer
into communist states such as China, which means Taiwan is falling behind the
rest of the world because it only allows Taiwanese chipmakers to produce 8-inch
or smaller wafers in China. The Ministry of Economic Affairs is planning talks
with chipmakers and it may relax restrictions in September.
The problem is that Intel is just building a DRAM memory chip fab, whereas
Taiwan is looking at loosening restrictions on wafer fabs, which are capable of
making multiple integrated circuits with more complex technologies. We cannot
just focus on the Wassenaar Arrangement. More important is the impact that the
relocation of the wafer industry will have on Taiwan’s economy and society.
Taiwan has the world’s best wafer foundry industry. Including design, testing,
and packing, the total production value of the industry is as high as NT$1.5
trillion (US$49.3 billion) and employs at least 150,000 people.
China used to lag far behind Taiwan in wafer technology. It began to develop
8-inch wafer foundries by launching the Tenth Five-Year Plan in 2001, which
included rewards for Taiwanese businesses investing in China. Even though Taiwan
tried hard to stop its businesses investing in China at the time, some went
ahead without permission.
For example, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp chief executive
officer Richard Chang (張汝京) is from Taiwan and is now in China competing with
Taiwanese businesses. By 2004, the production value of China’s semiconductor
industry surpassed 50 billion yuan (US$7.3 billion) and the industry employed at
least 100,000 people.
In 2002, the government debated allowing investment in 8-inch fabs in China, It
decided that chipmakers could produce 8-inch wafers using 0.25-micron technology
in China after they mass production of 12-inch wafers began in Taiwan. By the
end of 2006, the government allowed Taiwanese chipmakers to produce 8-inch
wafers in China using 0.18-micron technology after they were able to produce
12-inch fabs using 90 and 65-nanometer technology in Taiwan.
As technology matures, the export of technology is only a matter of time.
However, the government has to pay close attention to the timing of such exports
so the country doesn’t lose its competitive advantage.
In 2006, China launched its 11th Five-Year Plan, vowing to use 0.13-micron and
even smaller technologies to develop its own 12-inch wafer foundry industry,
with the goal of boosting its production value to 300 billion yuan by 2010. It
is keen to replace Taiwan in the global semiconductor industry. However, the
quickest way to achieve that goal is to entice Taiwan’s high-tech professionals
to work in China to reproduce a copy of Taiwan’s upstream, midstream and
downstream semiconductor industry.
The semiconductor industry remains crucial to Taiwan and the government must do
what it can to keep the industry here. Ma cannot just loosen restrictions,
thereby strengthening China’s semiconductor industry and weakening Taiwan’s
national competitiveness. The government must not make a decision based solely
on talks with chipmakers. It should invite all sectors of society to extensively
discuss the issue.
Jason Liu is a chemical engineering
professor at National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.
Comment by Taiwan
228 Movement Net Radio Commentary by Taiwan 228 Movement Net Radio: We would add that even the chipmakers are wrong! The importance of the semiconductor industry for Taiwan’s economic future cannot be underestimated. Taiwan needs the industry’s profit for its next stage of development. Yes, some day the semiconductor industry will be obsolete in terms of its profit generation capability. And new industries, such as biotechnology or refined agricultural products that focus on quality as oppose to quantity, will replace semiconductor as the main engines for our economic growth. But the Republic of Taiwan needs the profits and wealth from the chipmakers to invest in these new industries. Only then can our economy keep growing. So the chipmakers are wrong, not only because they don’t think about Taiwan’s future, but they also don’t think about their own future. Postponement and trying to milk as much profit as possible from the semiconductor industry is the best strategies for the chipmakers and their shareholders. Then and only then can they use these profits and wealth to invest in the new industries. This is simply profit maximization from a declining industry. By investing in China, the chipmakers will either decrease the total amount of wealth they can generate, or, at worst case, lose all their capital, due to China’s lawlessness. |