Chen ends
hunger strike after Wu visit
DODGY DVDS: The former
president's lawyers made public videos of interviews with key witnesses, many of
which were incomplete or muted in certain places
By Jimmy Chuang
STAFF REPORTER
Tuesday, Feb 24, 2009, Page 1
Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) yesterday ended his four-day hunger
strike, the day before a three-day court hearing that is part of his trial on
money-laundering and corruption charges.
Chen had not eaten anything since Friday in protest at what he says is political
persecution by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government.
The former president started eating again after his wife, Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍),
visited him for the first time since he was detained in late December.
“He ate some rice porridge and some fish and vegetables his wife brought in,”
Taipei Detention House deputy director Lee Ta-chu (李大竹) said.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Hsueh Ling (薛凌), who accompanied
Wu, told reporters that Wu asked her husband to eat as he would need his
strength to fight the charges against him.
“He is still in reasonable health, although a little dehydrated and should be
able to attend tomorrow’s hearing,” Lee said.
Meanwhile, Chen’s lawyers told a press conference at Chen’s office yesterday
afternoon that prosecutors from the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office Special
Investigation Panel (SIP) had deliberately altered witnesses’ testimony in the
alleged money laundering case.
His lawyers yesterday made public DVDs of prosecutors’ interviews with former
Presidential Office treasurer Chen Chen-hui (陳鎮慧), former Chinatrust Financial
Holding Co (中信金控) vice chairman Jeffrey Koo Jr (辜仲諒), Taiwan Cement Corp (台泥)
chairman Leslie Koo (辜成允) and James Lee (李界木), former Hsinchu Science Park
Administration chief. Conversations between the defendants and SIP prosecutors
were incomplete, as parts of them were muted and other parts had been deleted.
“This is incontrovertible evidence that the statements from witnesses presented
by the SIP are insufficient and ineligible as evidence for the hearings, as they
are incomplete,” said Cheng Wen-lung (鄭文龍), one of the former president’s
lawyers.
In addition, Cheng also questioned why prosecutors had only selected statements
against Chen Shui-bian and deleted statements made in his favor.
“Statements like these should be inadmissible as evidence for hearings,” said
Shih Yi-ling (石宜琳), another lawyer.
“We will ask the judges to review these DVDs. We will also ask for
cross-examination of the witnesses and the former president in court if
necessary,” Shih said.
In response to the complaints, SIP spokesman Chen Yun-nan (陳雲南) said: “Our
colleagues may have forgotten to push the record button, so some of the
interview would be muted. Glitches like these can be ironed out in the future.
But all these statements were signed by the witnesses under their own free will.
So the statements are 100 percent qualified as testimony for the hearings.”
Chen Yun-nan also confirmed that prosecutors interviewed Central Bank Governor
Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) in connection with the case at a secret location yesterday,
but the spokesman refused to confirm the contents of the conversation.
DPP pans
Ma’s unfreezing of 228 budget
INSiNCERE: DPP officials said
the president was only concerned with winning votes and avoiding protests, and
that he still revered the dictator behind the 228 carnage
By Flora Wang And
Rich Chang
STAFF REPORTERS
Tuesday, Feb 24, 2009, Page 3
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday criticized President Ma Ying-jeou’s
(馬英九) decision to unfreeze the budget for the 228 Memorial Foundation, calling
it insincere.
“It is clear the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] has boycotted issues related to
the 228 Incident because of its ideology and Ma Ying-jeou’s decision to unfreeze
the 228 foundation budget was only made because victims’ families were mulling a
protest against him over the issue on the eve of 228 Memorial Day. I think Ma’s
decision was insincere and hypocritical,” DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文)
told reporters at a press conference yesterday.
Ma on Sunday promised to continue funding the 228 Memorial Foundation with an
annual budget of NT$300 million (US$9.2 million) after the legislature,
dominated by the KMT, froze last year’s budget and then refused to grant a
budget for this year.
SUPPORT
Ma, who has long sought support from 228 Incident victims, said the government
would make up for the previous cuts by providing an annual budget starting next
year.
The president also asked the Cabinet to apply to the legislature to unfreeze the
2008 budget.
DPP Legislator Lee Chun-yee (李俊毅) told a press conference the KMT government
should fund the 228 Memorial Foundation with the whole budget of NT$1.5 billion
at once and allow the foundation to operate independently if Ma really wanted to
compensate 228 Incident victims.
If Ma is involved in the foundation’s operation, he and his party will be able
to manipulate it, Lee said.
Although Ma was making an effort to compensate 228 victims, he and the KMT still
idolized the prime culprit behind the killings — dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石)
— and his decisions to reopen the Chiang Kai-shek mausoleum at Tzuhu (慈湖) and
propose changing the name of National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall back to
Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall was proof of this, Lee said.
DPP Legislator Gao Jyh-peng (高志鵬) said Ma decided to continue funding the 228
foundation to win more votes in elections.
KMT SUPPORT
Meanwhile, the KMT caucus yesterday threw its support behind Ma’s promise to
continue the foundation’s funding, but a KMT legislator who previously proposed
freezing the foundation’s budget expressed reservations.
At a press conference, the KMT caucus said it would respect and support the
president’s call.
KMT Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇), who was present during the media conference,
said the Legislative Yuan could discuss whether to unfreeze the foundation’s
budget in the current spring session.
The 228 Incident refers to an uprising against the KMT that began on Feb. 27,
1947, and was followed by a bloody crackdown, resulting in the deaths of tens of
thousands of civilians.
However, KMT Legislator Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), who proposed last year to freeze
the foundation’s budget request, said the government should instead review
whether the foundation had achieved its mission of promoting harmony between
different ethnic groups.
“Is it really trying to bridge the gap between different ethnic groups or trying
to incite conflict and hatred each time Feb. 28 approaches? [If so], it is
meaningless to continue to fund the foundation,” Hung told reporters.
When asked for comment on the government’s plan to reinstate the plaque bearing
the title Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall by July, Wu said the government should
prevent conflict while returning the plaque to the hall.
KMT, get your
priorities right
Let me see if I understand this correctly. Under the KMT’s watch, Taiwan’s
unemployment rate is skyrocketing, GDP is in a free fall, exports are at their
lowest in decades and people are increasingly concerned about losing their jobs
and feel insecure about their future — yet Kaohsiung City Councilor Wang Ling-chiao
(王齡嬌) of the KMT can find nothing better to do than collect signatures for a
petition asking that the son of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) not be
allowed to live in Kaohsiung.
I am sure there are rapists and child molesters living in southern Taiwan, yet
no one is seeking to force them to change their city of residence.
The KMT does a great job of shifting attention away from how horribly it runs
the country and onto the former president and his family.
Hopefully Taiwanese are smart enough to see through these tricks but I don’t
hold out much hope based on the KMT supporters that I know.
Maybe we should start a petition asking that Wang leave the country. Let me know
where and when to sign up for that.
CHRISTOPHER CASAS
Taipei
Prisoners have
rights too
The Geneva Conventions grant prisoners of war protection from “public
curiosity.” But in the civilian case involving former president Chen Shui-bian,
the media have inflamed public curiosity, often showing Chen through barbed wire
doing his daily workout.
The guilt of the former president has not yet been proven in court and
statements from President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) affirm that Chen is not being
punished.
Public interest, which differs from public curiosity, is insufficient cause to
infringe the minimum rights that ensure a fair trial. It is horrific to see
footage of Chen in prison dress being broadcast repeatedly.
Though I feel he may likely be found guilty of at least some charge of
corruption, guilt in this case should not be influenced merely in the interest
of public curiosity.
As people deserve to be treated humanely, Taiwan has an obligation to establish
better rules for custody that protect even guilty prisoners from public
curiosity.
TOM ANDERSON
Jhongli, Taoyuan County