Rally is
just the beginning: Tsai
DISCONTENT: The chairperson
of the DPP said a series of activities opposing President Ma Ying-jeou's
pro-China policies were in store, including a possible recall motion
By Rich Chang
STAFF REPORTER, WITH DPA
Saturday, May 16, 2009, Page 1
|
A worker prepares to unload
barriers to be placed along Ketagalan Boulevard yesterday ahead of
tomorrow’s Democratic Progressive Party-organized demonstration. PHOTO: WANG YI-SUNG, TAIPEI TIMES |
The Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) planned mass protest tomorrow
over what it sees as the government*s risky cross-strait and economic policies
is only the start of a series of activities that might include initiating a
recall motion to unseat President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), DPP Chairperson Tsai
Ing-wen (蔡英文) said yesterday.
"We are concerned about the government's cross-strait policy, which lacks not
only transparency but also checks and balances," Tsai told an international
press conference on why the party is staging the rally, adding that her party
"would not rule out initiating a recall motion to unseat Ma if he fails to heed
the public's concerns."
Tsai said the DPP's rally in Taipei was aimed at telling Ma that his policies
harm Taiwan.
Without seeking a consensus and formal approval from the legislature, the Ma
administration had instituted what the DPP deems as improper and risky China
policies, including opening up the nation at the expense of its sovereignty, she
said.
"We do not oppose forging ties with China, but this has to be done prudently in
a step-by-step process," she said.
Tsai said that by engaging China, Ma had been leaning too far toward Beijing and
compromising the sovereignty of Taiwan. Worse, Ma was promoting China as a
"wonder drug" for Taiwan's dismal economy, she said.
"By emphasizing the China element and short-term economic benefit, Ma has failed
to take note of the sovereignty of Taiwan and the social impact of opening up
the Taiwanese market to China," she said.
Tomorrow's rally will begin in four places, the DPP said. Protesters will gather
at 2pm in front of National Taiwan University, the Wellcome market on Zhongxiao
E Road near Dunhua Road, Wanhua Train Station and the Zhongshan Soccer Stadium.
All four routes will converge in front of the Presidential Office.
The DPP plans to stage a 24-hour sit-in demonstration in front of the
Presidential Office following the rally to protest the Cabinet's proposed
amendment to the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法). The amendment, if passed,
would give police the right to prevent a rally or change its route if they deem
it a threat to national security, social order or the public interest. The
proposal would also give police the authority to break up any rally that blocked
traffic.
After tomorrow's rally, the DPP would push to abolish the Assembly and Parade
Act, hold a nationwide referendum on the government's proposed economic
cooperation framework agreement with China and demand that Premier Liu
Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) resign, she said.
Asked how many people would show up at the rally, she said: "We expect somewhere
around half a million to join us in the protest."
Another demonstration will be held in Kaohsiung City tomorrow afternoon by a
number of pro-〝independence groups.
World United Formosans for Independence chairman Ng Chiau-tong (黃昭堂), one of the
organizers of the Kaohsiung rally, said the demonstration in 〝Kaohsiung City was
not intended as a boycott of the DPP, but was meant to complement the rally in
Taipei.
Ng said the Kaohsiung rally would be held because it would be difficult to rent
enough buses to send all the people in central and southern Taiwan who wanted to
demonstrate to the rally in Taipei.
The Central Taiwan Society (台灣中社), Taichung City Medical Professionals Alliance
and Taiwan Heart's (台灣心會) Taichung branch jointly booked a train of 13 cars and
said the train, to depart for Kaohsiung from the Taichung Railway Station at
9:52am tomorrow, would pick up passengers along the way who are interested in
taking part in the Kaohsiung rally.
Meanwhile, in related news, former president Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) son, Chen
Chih-chung (陳致中), said yesterday that he and his family members would not attend
the rallies.
Myanmar
faces pressure to release Suu Kyi
AFP , YANGON, MYANMAR
Saturday, May 16, 2009, Page 1
Myanmar faced intense international pressure yesterday to release pro-democracy
icon Aung San Suu Kyi after she was imprisoned ahead of a new trial next week
for breaching the terms of her house arrest.
The ruling military junta took the Nobel Peace Prize laureate from her home on
Thursday to Yangon’s notorious Insein prison, where she was charged over a
bizarre incident in which an American man swam to her lakeside residence.
The US led Western calls for her immediate release while rights groups urged the
UN Security Council to intervene to help the 63-year-old, whose trial is to
start at the prison on Monday.
There was no comment from Myanmar’s secretive regime, which has kept Aung San
Suu Kyi in detention for most of the last 19 years and now looks set to do so
past controversial elections that are due next year.
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said she was “deeply troubled” by the
“baseless” case laid against Aung San Suu Kyi just days before her latest
six-year detention was to have expired.
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said he was “gravely concerned,” while the UN
special envoy on human rights in Myanmar, Tomas Ojea Quintana, called for Aung
San Suu Kyi to be freed, and said her detention broke the country’s laws.
Britain, France and other Western nations — which like the US have imposed
sanctions on the country — condemned the decision and said it did not bode well
for next year’s elections.
Indonesia became the first of Myanmar’s partners in the 10-member ASEAN to call
for the junta to release her and drop the “arbitrary” new charges against her.
Myanmar authorities are currently holding Aung San Suu Kyi and her two maids,
who were also charged, at a house inside the grounds of Insein Prison pending
the trial, her lawyers have said.
The case centered around a mysterious US national, John Yettaw, who was
arrested last week after using a pair of homemade flippers to swim across a lake
to Aung San Suu Kyi’s crumbling house.
Reportedly a Mormon father of seven and a Vietnam War veteran, the heavy-set
53-year-old also faces charges of violating the restricted area around her home
and breaching immigration conditions.
His motives remain unclear but Irrawaddy magazine, published by Myanmar exiles
in Thailand, said he was “simply a weird character who acted alone.”
Wardens
punish Chen over hunger strike
RIGHTS VIOLATION?: Detention
center staff took away the former president’s TV and did not allow him out of
his cell three times to punish him for his hunger strike
STAFF WRITER, WITH CNA
Saturday, May 16, 2009, Page 1
“The center will also return [Chen’s] TV and radio as soon as he begins to take food.”— Lee Ta-chu, deputy warden at Taipei Detention Center
|
A room similar
to that used by former president Chen Shui-bian in the Taipei Detention
Center is pictured earlier this month.The room does not have a bed and
Chen can only sleep on the floor. PHOTO: TSAI WEI-CHI, TAIPEI TIMES |
Authorities at the Taipei Detention Center yesterday defended
their decision to discipline detained former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) over
his hunger strike, which entered its ninth day yesterday, before Chen took
nourishment.
Chen’s punishment — stripping him of his visitation privileges one time and not
allowing him out of his cell three times, as well as confiscating his TV and
radio — are justifiable and comply with the law, said Lee Ta-chu (李大竹), a deputy
warden at the center.
Lee made the remarks in response to criticism by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)
legislators Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) and Lee Chun-yi (李俊毅), who said the center
mistreated the former president and violated his human rights.
In response, Lee Ta-chu said the center allowed him to meet with DPP
heavyweights, including DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and former premier Su
Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) on Thursday.
“The center will also return his TV and radio as soon as he begins to take
food,” the warden said.
The center late last night said Chen yesterday had started drinking some mishui
(米水, liquid drawn from rice porridge). Because of this, the radio and the TV had
been returned to Chen.
The warden said that the former president appeared to be in good shape
yesterday after having some water and sports drinks, with normal readings for
both blood pressure and pulse.
Chen has been held at the detention center in Tucheng (土城), Taipei County, since
Dec. 30 on charges of corruption, money laundering and other crimes. A court
ruling on Monday extended his detention for two more months until late July.
The judges said in their ruling that Chen should remain in custody to facilitate
probes into the criminal charges against him. If released, the ruling said, Chen
could collude with other suspects, destroy evidence or flee the country.
Chen and his wife, Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍), are standing trial on charges of embezzling
from a special presidential fund while Chen was in power, receiving bribes in
connection with a government land deal and laundering part of the funds by
wiring the money to Swiss bank accounts.
They were also indicted on new graft charges earlier this month. Prosecutors
said they took bribes from 2002 to 2005 from local bankers, but the couple said
that the funds were either political donations or money to promote Taiwanese
interests overseas.
Chen has repeatedly said he is innocent and that he is being persecuted by the
administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) for his anti-China stance.
Many DPP politicians and some commentators have pushed for an end to Chen’s
detention, arguing that the court has extended Chen’s detention without
justification.
DPP Spokesman Cheng Wen-tsang (鄭文燦) said earlier this week that continued
detention was unjustifiable and unnecessary.
The reasons for continuing to hold him in custody were absurd and a flagrant
violation of Chen’s human rights, Cheng said.
Krugman,
Cabinet officials discuss healthcare system
By Shih Hsiu-chuan
STAFF REPORTER
Saturday, May 16, 2009, Page 3
|
Nobel laureate in economics Paul Krugman speaks at a forum in Taipei on Thursday. PHOTO: CHIEN JUNG-FONG, TAIPEI TIMES |
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman held a lunch meeting with Vice
Premier Paul Chiu (邱正雄) and senior officials at the Executive Yuan, exchanging
ideas on the national health insurance system, fiscal and economic issues.
The 90-minute lunch meeting was closed to media.
TAXES
An official with the Government Information Office quoted Krugman as saying that
raising value-added taxes or adopting other tax measures that are politically
acceptable might be a solution to the dire financial problems facing Taiwan’s
national health insurance system.
The official, who attended the discussion, asked to remain anonymous as he was
not authorized to speak to the press.
Prior to the lunch meeting, Department of Health Minister Yeh Ching-chuan (葉金川)
gave Krugman a briefing on Taiwan’s national health insurance system.
SUCCESS
Yeh quoted Krugman as saying he wished to learn from Taiwan’s experience in
implementing the compulsory comprehensive national healthcare system, which he
said was recognized worldwide for its success in improving the nation’s health.
Meanwhile, Cabinet officials asked the Nobel laureate for his opinion on
potential solutions to the national health system’s fund shortage problems.
The deficit in the national health insurance system was a problem common to
every country, not only Taiwan, Yeh quoted Krugman as saying.
EXPENDITURE
“The national insurance system should be supported by various resources and the
government should expand its income bases. But Taiwan did not expand the income
bases of the system by raising the premium,” the anonymous official quoted
Krugman as saying.
The official said Krugman thought that expenditure for Taiwan’s national health
insurance system was still low, and would only be considered too high when it
reached 16 percent, as it is in the US.
Ma calls
for strengthening defense
By Mo Yan-chih
STAFF REPORTER
Saturday, May 16, 2009, Page 3
|
President Ma
Ying-jeou, second left, waves to the media during an inspection tour of
the Zuoying naval base in Kaohsiung yesterday. PHOTO: CNA |
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) yesterday underlined the need to strengthen
the nation's military power in case of war during an inspection tour of the
naval base in Kaohsiung.
“Through cross-strait negotiations, the government has reduced tensions and
restored peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, we should not be slack in
establishing military force in preparation for war,” Ma said during an
inspection tour of the Zuoying (左營) naval base in Kaohsiung.
As Beijing has not reduced the scale of its deployment of weapons against
Taiwan, Taipei should maintain its defensive force despite improvements in
cross-strait relations under his administration, Ma said.
Ma, accompanied by National Security Council Secretary-General Su Chi (蘇起) and
Minister of National Defense Chen Chao-min (陳肇敏), inspected two submarines and
encouraged the navy to perform better.
Ma later inspected the marine training base on Takao Hill (柴山). He called on the
troops to strengthen their physical abilities, while vowing to enforce
discipline to prevent corruption in the military.
“Public trust is the biggest asset of a government. Corruption and abuse of
power will erode public faith in us,” Ma said.
The president's inspection of the military bases came in the wake of scandals
involving high-level military officials, including former Marine Corps commander
Lieutenant-General Hsu Shang-wen (徐尚文), who attempted to commit suicide after
being disciplined over corruption allegations.
Chen, who suffered from low approval ratings in recent polls conducted by the
local media, said the scandals involving military officials and soldiers had
damaged the reputation of the military.
He said the ministry would work harder to strengthen discipline in the military.
Somalia
clashes kill 139 civilians
STATE OF FAILURE: The
violence is aggravating an already dire humanitarian situation in the Horn of
Africa nation once popular for safe streets and cafes
REUTERS , MOGADISHU
Saturday, May 16, 2009, Page 6
|
Islamist
teenage fighters man a checkpoint at a road in the vicinity of the
presidential villa in Mogadishu on Thursday. PHOTO: AFP |
Islamist rebels and Somalia’s Western-backed government and allies
exchanged mortar and small arms fire on Thursday in the seventh day of clashes
in Mogadishu that have killed 139 civilians.
Years of conflict in Somalia have killed tens of thousands, displaced millions
more, defied 15 attempts to establish central rule and created one of the
world’s worst aid crises.
“Twenty-six civilians died and 98 were injured on Wednesday and Thursday,” said
Yasin Ali Gedi, vice chairman of the Mogadishu-based Elman Peace and Human
Rights group.
“Thousands have also evacuated in this period, because fighting has spread to
new districts,” he said.
The militant al-Shabaab and forces loyal to Somali President Sheikh Sharif Ahmed
continued to battle in Mogadishu. Pockmarked buildings near the presidential
villa shook from the latest bout of clashes, which have plagued the country
since Somali dictator Mohamed Siad Barre was ousted in 1991.
Residents said African Union (AU) peacekeepers (AMISOM) shelled insurgent
strongholds. Like most guerrilla wars, rebels stage hit-and-run attacks and hide
among the populace.
“I saw them transporting 10 dead bodies and dozens of injured in mini-buses,”
resident Abdi Hussein said. “They were all opposition, because they were masked.
Government soldiers also died, but I could count only three. I’m sure there are
more. We were running from the shelling of AMISOM.”
AU spokesman Barigye Ba-Hoku said: “We are neither involved in fighting nor
shelling ... The opposition blames shelling on us as an excuse to attack our
bases.”
Influential opposition leader Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys accused UN envoy Ahmedou
Ould-Abdallah of trying to destroy Somalia by his support for the transitional
government and dismissed any talks with Ahmed’s administration.
“It is a surprise to see Ould-Abdallah destroying Somalia when he, as a Muslim,
has an obligation of being honest of what he has to do for Somalis,” Aweys said.
“The troops who came to keep Muslim leaders away from the leadership have to
leave the country. [Then] we are granting every Somali that there will be no
fighting. We will sit together and solve everything through dialogue,” he said.
Aid organizations warned on Thursday that Somalia’s worst fighting in months was
aggravating an already dire humanitarian emergency in the Horn of Africa nation.
Once famed for its open cafes and safe streets where residents took nightly
strolls — known as passagiato from the former colonial rulers, Italy — Mogadishu
is now synonymous with anarchy and evokes images of militias atop battle wagons.
Expansion
of rights and the KMT
Saturday, May 16, 2009, Page 8
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has a way with words. In signing into law the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights on Thursday, Ma
said that “the government is committed to protecting human rights, and it is not
lip service but real action. I now declare to the world that Taiwan’s protection
of human rights will be on the same track as the international community and at
the same pace.”
There is reason to be skeptical about Ma’s ability to implement meaningful
change after conducting a review of laws and procedures. The main obstacle is a
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-dominated legislature that does not share Ma’s
soft spot for international admiration. The KMT caucus — no tool of the
president — is unlikely to amend laws in ways that reduce the influence of
legislators or the KMT, particularly the party’s ability to manipulate the
judiciary and electoral processes.
A good number of the covenants’ articles cover ground that is compatible with
Taiwanese law and administrative practice. But there are a number of articles
that could cause the KMT government concern even after it attempts to spruce up
the books.
Most important is ICCPR Article 1(1), which states “All peoples have the right
of self-determination” and shall “freely determine their political status and
freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”
The KMT government has yet to declare what a political deal with China will
entail. By signing this article into law, any action taken by the government
that deprives Taiwanese of self-determination will be rendered illegal. It is
hard to see many — perhaps a majority — of KMT legislators accepting this.
Another timely example is Article 14(3b), which mandates that a criminal suspect
has “adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defense and to
communicate with counsel of his own choosing.” There is much room for legal
debate over the meaning of “adequate” in this article, but by any reasonable
measure, the detention of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) by the Taipei
District Court at the Taipei Detention Center, whose punitive retaliation over
his latest hunger strike is worthy of Myanmar’s junta, could be declared illegal
on this basis.
Article 22, which deals with freedom of association, would appear to render
illegal the state’s opposition to labor unions for schoolteachers.
There are many other examples of possible grounds for legal action by Taiwanese
and foreign nationals whose rights have been expanded by the signing into law of
the covenants.
Dealing with these issues will require of the president an even hand and the
ability to stare down hardliners in his party. On this score, Ma’s track record
is unenviable. At times he can be conciliatory to his opponents, but his
character and the fundamental nature of the KMT are such that, when he was party
chairman, sustained pressure from hardliners compelled him to relent each and
every time. As president, with more power at his disposal and — perhaps —
growing confidence in his role, this might change. We can only hope.
Legal reforms in matters involving human rights require more than power
politics; they require leadership that generates broad support in the electorate
and bipartisan cooperation in the legislature. To create such an environment in
the present context, in which populism is slowly gaining the upper hand over due
process, would amount to a minor miracle.
Things that
we need to pass on to Krugman
By Lin Chih-hung 林志宏
Saturday, May 16, 2009, Page 8
Taiwan’s independence supporters must tell US economist Paul Krugman about
tomorrow’s protest and why they will be taking to the streets.
Krugman, who won the Nobel Prize for economics, was in China before arriving in
Taiwan on Thursday. He is expected to stay in Taiwan for three days.
Krugman has international influence. If he knew that tomorrow’s demonstration is
being held to show how unhappy Taiwanese are about the pro-China policies of
President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government, he might mention the issue in his
column in the New York Times. This would give the Taiwanese public more of a
chance to stop Ma’s “democratic dictatorship” and block his goal of unification
with China.
I earnestly hope that senior pro-independence figures, English media outlets who
care about Taiwan and academics and other experts who write in English will take
advantage of this opportunity to let him hear the true voices of the Taiwanese
public, perhaps by making contributions to Krugman’s blog.
Every extra influential friend Taiwan has in the international community gives
us an extra chance to work our way out of the current troubles.
A few years ago, Krugman praised Taiwan’s health insurance system, which was
initiated and realized by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). In Beijing on
Monday, Krugman said — straight out — that China’s huge trade surplus was the
result of government interference and that there was no way the world could
continue to accept this situation.
Krugman also said that the yuan would not become an international currency in
our lifetime because China lacks a solid bond market.
Taiwan’s pro-unification media will not highlight such comments, and may not
even report them. These outlets, which view China as the mother country, will
only give space to material such as China and the US being dubbed as the “G2.”
They could twist Krugman’s statement that he knew nothing about the mooted
economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) into making him sound as if he
supports an ECFA and that it would be good for both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
Taiwanese media outlets are, after all, brainwashing readers into thinking that
relying on China is the only way to save the economy.
We must remind Krugman that Taiwan is facing a grave threat to its democracy. We
must tell him that Taiwan has a minority of “high-class Mainlanders” whose
fathers gained privileges through bloody, totalitarian rule and that this
minority is now using its inherited privileges to control the media and the
judiciary to manipulate the Hoklo and Hakka ethnic groups that make up the
majority of the population.
We need to let Krugman know about the deal that the KMT has with the Chinese
Communist Party (CCP) to allow the latter to take over Taiwan.
Krugman once warned the world that economic development will not decrease
military conflict. Meanwhile, China has warned us of seven circumstances or “red
lines” that, if crossed, will result in China taking military action against
Taiwan — even as our professional student of a president runs around pinning
Taiwan’s hope on Chinese goodwill.
Krugman once said about trade with China: “They give us poisoned products, we
give them worthless paper.” He also opposed a Chinese buyout of major US
petroleum explorer and marketer Unocal for strategic reasons.
I believe he will listen to the Taiwanese public and I would implore the leaders
of pro-Taiwan media outlets to make good use of this opportunity.