|
Premier in U-turn
on beef delegation
VACILLATING VISIT: Wu Den-yih
said the president’s plan to send a delegation to Washington made up of
officials from the Executive Yuan had been scrapped
By Shih Hsiu-chuan
STAFF REPORTER
Friday, Jan 01, 2010, Page 1
The government yesterday called off a plan to send a delegation made up of
members of the Executive Yuan to Washington to contain the fallout from the
legislature’s move to bar imports of certain US beef products.
Instead, a delegation mainly made up of lawmakers and representatives from
non-governmental organizations would head to the US on a fact-finding trip,
Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) said at a press conference yesterday.
It was an about-face after the Presidential Office on Wednesday relayed a
message from President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) instructing officials from the
Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Department of Health and the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs (MOFA) to form a delegation to go to the US “no later than next
week” to explain Taiwan’s stance on the beef issue to the US government.
Ma also wanted the government to arrange a trip to the US for lawmakers and
representatives from civil and consumer groups who have concerns over the safety
of US beef products to gain a better understanding of the beef industry.
The instructions followed a high-level meeting convened by Ma on fence-mending
efforts after the legislature declined on Tuesday to endorse the protocol that
Taiwan signed with the US in October that lifted the previous ban on US bone-in
beef and various other beef products.
Instead, lawmakers from both the governing and opposition parties reached a
consensus to vote through an amendment to the Act Governing Food Sanitation
(食品衛生管理法) on Tuesday that will ban imports of “risky” beef products from areas
where cases of mad cow disease have been recorded in the previous decade.
The legislative move has drawn a rebuke from Washington, which expressed dismay,
believing the proposed amendment contravenes the protocol.
Minister of Foreign Affairs Timothy Yang (楊進添) yesterday denied the government
had canceled the executive branch’s trip to the US because the US had closed the
door on negotiations with Taiwan following its statement issued on Wednesday
that warned against the legislature’s plan to statutorily ban certain US beef
products.
“There is no emergency” to send government officials to the US as the country’s
representative in the US, Jason Yuan (袁健生), talked to the US executive branch on
Wednesday and it went “smoothly,” Yang told reporters at the same press
conference Wu attended.
The US Trade Representative Office and its related administrative departments
had understood the efforts the Ma government undertook on the matter, Taiwanese
public opinion and the legislature’s concerns on the issue, Yang said.
“If there is any need in the future, we will send officials at the appropriate
level to communicate with the US,” Wu said.
Regarding the government’s response to the US’ dissatisfaction with Taiwan, Yang
said the government would urge the US to “accept the result agreed by lawmakers
across party lines,” “not to overreact” and “not to let other non-trade or
economic issues get involved.”
The government would also urge the US to express its goodwill toward Taiwan on
issues such as the resumption of Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA)
talks, arms sales, exchanges between high-level officials of the two countries
and its visa-waiver program to ensure the beef issue did not have a negative
impact on Taiwan-US relations, Yang said.
Yang said MOFA had met with Eric Madison, deputy director of the Taipei Office
of the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT), and had conveyed the government’s
position that both sides should “talk rationally” to avoid a “lose-lose
situation.”
The US should work with the government to lessen the impact on bilateral
relationships, Yang said.
In MOFA’s written briefing to the Executive Yuan yesterday, Yang said
responsibility to persuade the public to accept the government’s relaxation of
restrictions on US beef products “did not fully fall on our side,” adding that
the “AIT lacked efficient measures to promote [US beef products],” which made it
more difficult for the government to implement the protocol it signed.
Yang said the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US would
tell the US Department of State “in a roundabout way” that it should “improve
its communication skills” when talking to the public and the legislature and
should “not unilaterally place pressure on our side.”
Wu said he appreciated that the efforts made by the legislature to prohibit some
US beef products were to “safeguard the public’s health” and “alleviate the
public’s concerns.”
Because the US and Taiwan are both democratic countries, Wu said the US would
understand that the legislature is the institution that has the final say on
policy because it represents the people.
“That is the universal rule in a democracy. Things like this are not unusual.
What an executive branch agrees to [with other countries in negotiations] is not
always approved by its congress,” Wu said.
Wu yesterday did not reveal details on who would join the group heading to the
US, when it would depart and who it would visit, saying that the government
needed more time to make the arrangements.
But legislators across party lines gave a cold shoulder to a possible invitation
to join the group.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus secretary-general Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟)
said Taiwan was not a US colony, adding that even if legislators were to
participate in the delegation, the responsibility of legislators is to inspect
the safety of US beef and not to explain the legislature’s proposed amendment to
US officials.
“The Legislative Yuan should not belittle itself,” Lu said.
Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) said he had not received an invitation
to join the group, adding that no legislators could join a delegation
representing the legislature without a resolution being passed.
Wang said Washington should be aware that the amendment only affects about 2
percent of Taiwan’s total US beef imports.
Meanwhile, National Security Council (NSC) Deputy Secretary-General Lee Hai-tung
(李海東) said the high-level meeting convened a day earlier by Ma was sufficient to
address Washington’s discontent over the amendment and there was no need for
Taiwan to convene a national security meeting.
Lee was responding to a question from KMT Legislator Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) during a
meeting on the beef issue at the legislature. Lu described the issue as “a
diplomatic crisis between Taiwan and the United States.”
At a separate setting yesterday, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said
allowing US beef to have full and comprehensive access to Taiwan’s market was a
“monumental diplomatic mistake” by Ma and the Ma administration must apologize
to the public for ruining Taiwan-US relations.
DPP Spokesperson Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) said agreeing to lift the ban on US bone-in
beef was the “most serious mistake” since dictator Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石)
decision to withdraw from the UN in 1971.
More specifically, Hsiao blamed NSC Secretary-General Su Chi (蘇起), who is
accused by the DPP and some pan-blue lawmakers of forging a deal with the US
over the beef issue without first obtaining the consent of the public.
“If the beef issue ends up hurting Taiwan-US relations, Su must be held fully
accountable. The blame should not be shouldered by the Legislative Yuan or the
Taiwanese people,” Hsiao said.
She pointed out that in the past, the US has had disagreements with other
countries, such as Japan, South Korea and Europe, over disputes on agricultural
imports, but at no time had the conflict been so great as to affect military
cooperation.
“It is quite despicable of the Ma government to keep threatening the public,
saying if we ban US beef imports, the US would refuse to sell weapons to
Taiwan,” Hsiao said.
|
