¡@
Afghanistan: Opportunity for Taiwan
Tuesday, Jan 05, 2010, Page 8
Pundits have busied themselves in the past week trying to determine whether a
decision by Taipei to renegotiate US beef imports with Washington will have
implications on US security commitments to Taiwan. Already, an unexpected delay
in US President Barack Obama¡¦s weapons sale notification to Congress ¡X which had
been expected soon after Obama returned from climate talks in Copenhagen last
month ¡X had prompted speculation that Washington may be tying economic matters
to political ones and retaliating for the about-face.
Not only is it too soon to tell, but 60 years of US-Taiwan ties have shown that
Washington, at least in Taiwan¡¦s case, is capable of treating economics and
politics as separate matters ¡X as they should be. Likelier explanations for the
delay are the conflicting interests of the State Department, the Department of
Defense and the White House, as well as Obama¡¦s balancing act with Taipei and
Beijing and efforts to avoid derailing cross-strait rapprochement.
Washington handles diplomacy in multi-track fashion in that it usually rewards
and punishes within related sectors. As such, it retaliates on trade with trade,
and on military matters with military matters, with little cross-pollination.
Failure by Taipei to demonstrate that it takes its own defense seriously, as
opposed to freeloading on US security guarantees, would be one way to invite US
retaliation on arms sales. Lack of participation in non-proliferation efforts,
which were somewhat undermined last month when British intelligence linked
Taiwanese private firms to the sale of sensitive equipment to Iran, would be
another. US beef, however, isn¡¦t a deal-breaker on defense issues ¡X however
strongly some US policymakers feel about the matter.
The US also expects its allies to share the security burden. Nowhere has this
been clearer than in Afghanistan, where US generals have made plea after plea on
NATO and non-NATO allies to do more. After nine years of counterinsurgency, not
only are most Western countries threatening to pull their troops, but the
country remains on the brink of collapse. Facing this, the US ¡X which is sending
substantial reinforcements this year ¡X will likely turn to those who have yet to
play a role in the war-torn country to do their part.
It comes as no surprise, therefore, that Washington would ask Taiwan to play a
role in Afghanistan. Last week, a source in the Ministry of Defense told the
media that the US wants Taiwan to provide medical or engineering assistance to
troops there. This request is not unprecedented: During the Gulf War in 1991,
Taipei offered US$300 million toward the war effort, which Washington turned
down after pressure from Beijing. More recently, Taiwan has provided medical
assistance in Iraq.
Afghanistan is the story of our time, as its future direction will have a direct
impact on international security. No country, however isolated, will be
unaffected if the US-led alliance fails to avert Afghanistan¡¦s implosion ¡X not
even Taiwan. As a wealthy country that has profited from the US umbrella for
decades and as the world¡¦s 20th largest military by spending, Taiwan must
contribute to global stability, which would not go unnoticed in Washington.
By answering the call, Taiwan would also gain precious combat experience; in
Afghanistan, there is no such thing as a non-combat position. With the Ma Ying-jeou
(°¨^¤E) administration cutting down on military exercises, combat experience would
provide invaluable training ¡X the type of training that could make a difference
if Taiwan were attacked one day.
Taiwan must step up to the plate, otherwise it may be kicked out of the game
altogether.
|