|
King of more than just the KMT
Wednesday, Jan 20, 2010, Page 8
When King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) last month became Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
secretary-general, he spoke of “making the KMT a better party so that it will
allow the public to embrace it.” President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), meanwhile, who
doubles as KMT chairman, said King would be the party’s “chief executive
officer” in charge of implementing his agenda for party reform.
Just one month into the job, however, it has become clear that King’s clout
extends beyond the KMT’s internal affairs. The KMT secretary-general has
palpable influence over the executive and legislative arms of government.
Hours after King placed a call to Environmental Protection Administration (EPA)
Minister Stephen Shen (沈世宏) on Thursday to express concern over the EPA’s plan
to fine people who smoke while walking or riding on scooters, the EPA said it
was rethinking the proposal.
Then, the Executive Yuan yielded to King’s KMT-proposed version of an amendment
to the Local Government Act (地方制度法) even after legislators across party lines
reached an initial consensus supporting the Executive Yuan’s version.
With the government still licking its wounds from the US beef fiasco, which
pounded public confidence in Ma’s team, King’s actions are not helping
re-establish the president’s image and authority.
King dismissed critics who said he was meddling with EPA policy, arguing that he
simply conveyed public opinion to the government. “The party and government
agencies should work together to address public complaints,” he said.
While few would disagree that politicians and government agencies have a
responsibility to listen to public opinion, there are proper steps to convey
public concerns that don’t undermine the Executive Yuan’s authority.
But this isn’t just about King. Shen’s backpedaling was unacceptable. Instead,
he should have consulted Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) and waited for his directive
after taking up the matter at the weekly Cabinet meeting.
Wu, meanwhile, who had been sidestepped, then turned around and supported King,
perhaps out of a feeling of obligation, saying that what King did was “normal.”
King’s action sets a bad precedent by showing disregard for the chain of
command. The next time the executive branch is mulling a policy or drafting a
bill, the ministers will look not only to the premier but also to King for a
final nod.
The problem with meddling of this kind is that as a party official rather than a
government official, King is not accountable to the public. He is not obligated
to report to the legislature, nor is he subject to scrutiny by government
agencies.
Some may wonder why King has such clout. The answer lies in his full endorsement
by the president, which has sent a signal to the government and party alike.
If Ma has such confidence in King and wants him to have considerable and direct
influence on government policy, he should make him premier. In this scenario,
King would be subject to legislative scrutiny — and public assessment of his
competence.
|
