|
Ma could cave in to PRC: opposition
‘UNREASONABLE LIMITS’: Documents from the Chinese side
have raised fears that the president might come under severe pressure from
Beijing to give more than he wants
By Rich Chang and Ko Shu-ling
STAFF REPORTERS
Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010, Page 3
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU)
yesterday questioned the government’s promise not to allow Chinese agricultural
products to enter the country on the eve of the first round of official
negotiations on an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) today in
Beijing.
TSU Chairman Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝) cited a study by the Chinese Ministry of
Commerce, which said Taiwan still bars 2,194 Chinese items from entering Taiwan
— 1,360 industrial products and 834 agricultural products.
“These unreasonable limits have had a negative impact on cross-strait trading
practices and have undermined further integration,” Huang cited the report as
saying.
Huang said the report showed it would be impossible for Taiwan to benefit
unilaterally from the pact and questioned whether President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九)
might soon back down and allow certain Chinese agricultural products to enter
the country under pressure from Beijing.
“Could Ma promise never to allow Chinese agricultural products and labor from
entering the country?” Huang said, adding that even if Beijing agreed to open
the Chinese market to Taiwan without requiring reciprocal measures, it would be
a “trap” to allow Taiwan to become overdependent on China economically.
DPP Legislator Huang Wei-cher (黃偉哲) said he was afraid the country would soon
lift bans on Chinese agricultural products.
“The Chinese report is a serious warning and a slap in the face for Ma,” he
said.
DPP spokesman Tsai Chi-Chang (蔡其昌) said the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC)
belittled itself by saying than ECFA negotiations were a deal between “two
regions.”
“Taiwan is a sovereign country, not a region of China. No wonder the public
thinks the government cannot adequately represent the county in negotiations
with Beijing when government officials belittle their own county this way.”
The MAC yesterday defined the legal status of the ECFA as a trade relationship
between “two regions.”
MAC Deputy Minister Liu Te-shun (劉德勳) said that under the Act Governing
Relations between the Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area
(台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), the relationship between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait
is “region to region.”
“The legislature passed the law in 1992 and since then such a legal status has
never been changed no matter who is in power, including former presidents Lee
Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) or [President] Ma Ying-jeou,” Liu said.
“Such a theory is not something new invented by President Ma and that is why the
trade pact is called a cross-strait economic framework agreement,” he said.
Liu made the remarks after being asked by the Taipei Times at a press conference
yesterday morning to clarify Ma’s comments describing cross-strait ties as being
“between two regions.”
Liu also said the administration did not want to specify a timeframe for the
signing of a free-trade agreement (FTA) with China within an ECFA.
He did not say why, only emphasizing that cross-strait ties were “special.”
The proposed accord would proceed in a piecemeal manner, Liu said, except for
items included in the “early harvest” measures.
The rest would not require a timetable, Liu said.
“In future, we will propose more items meeting our needs via this platform when
necessary,” he said. “There is no need to set a 10-year timeframe.”
The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 stipulates that the
working party of any interim agreement must make appropriate recommendations on
the proposed timeframe and on measures required to complete the formation of the
free-trade area or customs union.
Article XXIV of the GATT 1994 also states that the contracting party, believing
that 10 years would be insufficient, shall provide a full explanation to the
Council for Trade in Goods of the need for a longer period.
The economic framework agreement signed between ASEAN countries and China also
clearly states that the trade pact is to establish an ASEAN-China FTA, within 10
years.
Liu said the government never said an ECFA would be modeled on the ASEAN-China
economic framework agreement, adding that more than 200 similar trade deals have
been made globally and that each one is different.
“Because of the special situation [in the Taiwan Strait], we will try to find
the most appropriate model for the two sides in accordance with our needs … one
that is acceptable to both,” he said.
“It is more important to determine the best deal for both sides via
negotiations than by setting a timeframe,” he said.
With Taipei and Beijing set to begin the first round of official negotiations on
an ECFA in Beijing today, Liu said both sides would not touch on the detailed
content of the planned pact, including “early harvest” measures.
They hoped, however, to begin such talks as soon as possible, possibly at the
beginning of next month, he said, adding that the administration would negotiate
with the public interest in mind.
Regarding Ma’s promise not to allow the import of more agricultural products
from China, Liu said it would not be specified in an ECFA because the accord is
a framework agreement.
Straits Exchange Foundation Secretary-General Kao Koong-lian (高孔廉), who is
leading the country’s negotiation team in Beijing, said it is both an economic
and social issue to open the market to more Chinese agricultural products and
that the two sides would not see it as a purely economic issue when negotiating
the ECFA.
Kao, however, reiterated Ma’s pledge to bar workers, as well as additional
agricultural products, from China.
|
