|
¡@
Challenging censorship in China
Thursday, Jan 28, 2010, Page 8
Google should be commended for its courage in standing up against Big Brother in
China after announcing its plan to stop censoring search results on its
google.cn platform ¡X a condition imposed on the US Internet giant when it
entered the Chinese market in 2006.
Two weeks have passed, however, and Google has yet to end censorship on its
platform. This tells us that it is remains caught between its business interests
in China and the universal principle of Internet freedom it should stand for.
This is not an easy decision, since the management of Google has to look after
the interests of its shareholders, who are obviously keen on securing its share
of the booming Internet market in China.
Ironically, if Google were to make good on its threat and pull out of the
Chinese market for good, it could be doing the authorities a favor. In Beijing¡¦s
eyes, the Internet giant is a threat to its control of information on the
Internet.
Nevertheless, Google should be reminded that if it were to rescind its threat
and continue to play a role in China¡¦s Internet censorship, its businesses
outside China could be jeopardized, as Internet surfers may not brook its
tainted integrity.
Google, therefore, should stop prevaricating and put an end to the censorship of
search results in China ¡X unless it has a backup plan that guarantees it can ¡§go
around¡¨ China¡¦s efforts to censor the Internet, as Microsoft founder Bill Gates
proposed on Tuesday.
The ultimate outcome, though, could be ugly: Should it refuse to go along with
Beijing¡¦s conditions, the search engine could be forced out of the market. If
this happened, China would only have itself to blame, and it is hard to believe
that the breakup would last very long.
Alongside its economic progress, China has every ambition to become a world
leader. To achieve this goal, it will face external pressure to make its
domestic market more fair and transparent and to democratize.
In the Google case, we have seen mounting support from the US government and
European countries, which should stick to their guns until changes in China
follow.
In the end, however, the biggest force behind China¡¦s liberalization will come
from within.
Unfortunately, there are very few signs at the moment to indicate that the
Chinese public or businesses are taking advantage of the opportunity created by
the Google spat to demand more Internet freedom. What we¡¦ve witnessed, instead,
is comments such as those by Alibaba Group Holding CEO Jack Ma (°¨¶³), who called
Google a failure in China, arguing in Taipei last week that the conflict was
nothing more that Google¡¦s poor attempt at making excuses for its shortcomings.
In the world of global business, Alibaba is no match for Google. The Chinese
search engine makes less than US$150 million in quarterly revenues, hardly on
par with Google¡¦s US$5.9 billion in the third quarter last year.
Unless Alibaba wishes to limit its growth to China alone, it is bound to stumble
if, as it seeks to expand, it continues to operate in a way that serves not its
clients but an authoritarian regime. Now that is a recipe for failure.
¡@
|
