¡@
It¡¦s not Ma¡¦s words, it¡¦s his deeds
Saturday, Mar 06, 2010, Page 8
Opinion polls continue to show low support for President Ma Ying-jeou (°¨^¤E).
Many media outlets and political commentators have accused him of ingratiating
himself with the public, but shirking responsibility in an empty political show.
The Presidential Office¡¦s spokesperson rejects such claims, saying the
government is working hard and that the criticism is ¡§unacceptable.¡¨ Ma and his
cohorts obviously don¡¦t understand where all the complaints are coming from.
If Ma wanted to understand, it would be easy. Let¡¦s look at how the government
handled the Typhoon Morakot disaster last August and how it handled Thursday¡¦s
earthquake.
When Morakot hit, the government¡¦s disaster relief center didn¡¦t know what was
going on. Top officials went on with their daily lives, Ma told local fire
brigades to send life boats ¡X not what was needed in the disaster area ¡X and the
military didn¡¦t mobilize any troops. No one knew how to deal with the situation
in the annihilated Siaolin Village (¤pªL), the Ministry of Foreign Affairs turned
down offers of foreign aid, disaster relief and reconstruction was delayed and
when visiting the disaster area several days later, an annoyed Ma met victim
complaints with a testy: ¡§I¡¦m here now, aren¡¦t I?¡¨
So it is not very surprising that public discontent boiled over.
Then, when a magnitude 6.4 earthquake struck Jiasian Township (¥Ò¥P), Kaohsiung
County, on Thursday morning, followed by a magnitude 5.7 aftershock in the
afternoon, causing panic, the military organized a relief effort in just 18
minutes. Premier Wu Den-yih (§d´°¸q) quickly called local governments for an update
and the disaster prevention center promptly kicked into gear, with Ma visiting
the area after only a few hours, demanding that hillsides be reinforced to
prevent landslides before the next heavy rainfall.
The result?
Neither local residents nor the media had any major criticism of the
government¡¦s handling of the situation.
Why the difference in the government¡¦s approach?
During the Morakot disaster, the government treated the situation lightly and in
a haphazard manner, reacting in the wrong way to public complaints and saying
the wrong things. It was the first time we saw the Ma administration ¡X which
claimed to be ¡§prepared and ready¡¨ ¡X in action and it was the turning point for
Ma¡¦s popularity.
After those lessons, the government didn¡¦t dare treat Thursday¡¦s earthquake
lightly; every concerned agency snapped to attention and did what it was
supposed to do, showing that the government¡¦s disaster prevention efforts are
finally back on track.
Ma has reacted to his dropping popularity and the KMT¡¦s consecutive defeats at
the ballot box by replacing the Presidential Office spokesperson, members of the
Cabinet and certain people in high-ranking party positions with people from his
presidential campaign team, and has responded quickly to public and media
criticism to avoid misunderstandings that are perceived as truths.
This is the wrong reaction.
The government doesn¡¦t suffer from a lack of publicity; what it lacks is the
correct policies and their forceful implementation in order to provide tangible
improvements to the lives of the public. The economy may look brighter, but with
employment still hovering just under 6 percent and no sign of dropping, and with
industry moving abroad, it hasn¡¦t yet recovered. Many unemployed have no income.
Households are suffering and the misery index remains high, so why should the
public give the government the thumbs-up or vote for the ruling party?
Only when Ma understands that the public cares less about what politicians say
than what they do, will he see that the criticism is fair. If he doesn¡¦t, he
will meet with more defeats further down the road.
¡@
|