| 
 ¡@ 
It¡¦s not Ma¡¦s words, it¡¦s his deeds 
 
Saturday, Mar 06, 2010, Page 8 
 
Opinion polls continue to show low support for President Ma Ying-jeou (°¨^¤E). 
Many media outlets and political commentators have accused him of ingratiating 
himself with the public, but shirking responsibility in an empty political show. 
 
The Presidential Office¡¦s spokesperson rejects such claims, saying the 
government is working hard and that the criticism is ¡§unacceptable.¡¨ Ma and his 
cohorts obviously don¡¦t understand where all the complaints are coming from. 
 
If Ma wanted to understand, it would be easy. Let¡¦s look at how the government 
handled the Typhoon Morakot disaster last August and how it handled Thursday¡¦s 
earthquake. 
 
When Morakot hit, the government¡¦s disaster relief center didn¡¦t know what was 
going on. Top officials went on with their daily lives, Ma told local fire 
brigades to send life boats ¡X not what was needed in the disaster area ¡X and the 
military didn¡¦t mobilize any troops. No one knew how to deal with the situation 
in the annihilated Siaolin Village (¤pªL), the Ministry of Foreign Affairs turned 
down offers of foreign aid, disaster relief and reconstruction was delayed and 
when visiting the disaster area several days later, an annoyed Ma met victim 
complaints with a testy: ¡§I¡¦m here now, aren¡¦t I?¡¨ 
 
So it is not very surprising that public discontent boiled over. 
 
Then, when a magnitude 6.4 earthquake struck Jiasian Township (¥Ò¥P), Kaohsiung 
County, on Thursday morning, followed by a magnitude 5.7 aftershock in the 
afternoon, causing panic, the military organized a relief effort in just 18 
minutes. Premier Wu Den-yih (§d´°¸q) quickly called local governments for an update 
and the disaster prevention center promptly kicked into gear, with Ma visiting 
the area after only a few hours, demanding that hillsides be reinforced to 
prevent landslides before the next heavy rainfall. 
 
The result? 
 
Neither local residents nor the media had any major criticism of the 
government¡¦s handling of the situation. 
 
Why the difference in the government¡¦s approach? 
 
During the Morakot disaster, the government treated the situation lightly and in 
a haphazard manner, reacting in the wrong way to public complaints and saying 
the wrong things. It was the first time we saw the Ma administration ¡X which 
claimed to be ¡§prepared and ready¡¨ ¡X in action and it was the turning point for 
Ma¡¦s popularity. 
 
After those lessons, the government didn¡¦t dare treat Thursday¡¦s earthquake 
lightly; every concerned agency snapped to attention and did what it was 
supposed to do, showing that the government¡¦s disaster prevention efforts are 
finally back on track. 
 
Ma has reacted to his dropping popularity and the KMT¡¦s consecutive defeats at 
the ballot box by replacing the Presidential Office spokesperson, members of the 
Cabinet and certain people in high-ranking party positions with people from his 
presidential campaign team, and has responded quickly to public and media 
criticism to avoid misunderstandings that are perceived as truths. 
 
This is the wrong reaction. 
 
The government doesn¡¦t suffer from a lack of publicity; what it lacks is the 
correct policies and their forceful implementation in order to provide tangible 
improvements to the lives of the public. The economy may look brighter, but with 
employment still hovering just under 6 percent and no sign of dropping, and with 
industry moving abroad, it hasn¡¦t yet recovered. Many unemployed have no income. 
Households are suffering and the misery index remains high, so why should the 
public give the government the thumbs-up or vote for the ruling party? 
 
Only when Ma understands that the public cares less about what politicians say 
than what they do, will he see that the criticism is fair. If he doesn¡¦t, he 
will meet with more defeats further down the road.  
¡@ 
 |