| 
   
‘Sensitive terms’ and sensitive 
celebrations 
By Hsu Chien-jung 許建榮 
Saturday, Apr 03, 2010, Page 8 
 
In China, “democracy,” “democratic parties,” “June 4” and even “6.4” are labeled 
“sensitive terms.” A massive Internet review system automatically replaces such 
terms with the words “sensitive term,” making it sometimes impossible to post 
certain phrases. For example, it would likely be impossible to say, “China’s 
economy has grown by 6.4 percent.” 
 
When Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) chatted with Internet users during an 
interview on the Chinese government’s official Web site and the Xinhua news 
agency’s Web site on Feb. 27, he said: “Only in a democracy is political order 
guaranteed even if there is a leadership change.” 
 
On some Web sites, this was changed to “only in a sensitive term is political 
order guaranteed even if there is a leadership change.” 
 
I had always thought that this was a strictly Chinese phenomenon, but to my 
surprise, sensitive terms also exist in free and democratic Taiwan. 
 
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration consider the words “nation’s 
founding” in the phrase “the 100th anniversary of the nation’s founding” (建國一百年) 
one such sensitive term, and it was therefore changed to “100 years of 
excellence” (精彩一百年) in connection to the centennial celebration of the founding 
of the Republic of China (ROC). 
 
In fact, in its dealings with China, the administration has begun to check its 
own language to define a set of sensitive terms and topics, such as “president,” 
“Tibet” and “Taiwan is an independent and sovereign state.” 
 
There are also other examples. The head of China’s Association for Relations 
Across the Taiwan Strait addressed Ma as “Mr Ma,” while the government has gone 
even further by not issuing entry visas to people who are not welcome in China, 
such as the Dalai Lama and World Uyghur Congress president Rebiya Kadeer. 
 
In the past, Ma often talked about the June 4 movement and freedom and human 
rights in Tibet, but that stopped after he became president; instead, he has 
praised China’s human rights record. 
 
It seems these issues have also been labeled “sensitive terms” as the government 
synchronizes its stance with that of China’s. If this continues, maybe 
“democracy” will be next on the list of sensitive terms. And when the list gets 
too long, maybe they’ll just replace such words with the phrase “sensitive 
term.” 
 
If statements by the Taiwanese government were only filtered out on Web sites in 
China, there would be no problem. 
 
However, if the government begins to censor itself, then the freedom, democracy 
and human rights the Taiwanese have fought so hard and so long for will have 
been all but destroyed. 
 
Taiwan is a democratic example to all Chinese around the world. Regardless of 
complaints about Taiwan’s political chaos, Taiwan, is undeniably a democracy. 
The more Taiwan insists on its independence, the deeper the understanding of the 
value of democracy among Chinese around the world. 
 
Lately, China has increased pressure on Hong Kong, its showcase for the “one 
country, two systems” model. Taiwan’s persistence will strengthen the efforts of 
Hong Kong’s democracy activists. 
 
Chances are that China will also celebrate the 100th anniversary of the 1911 
Xinhai Revolution that toppled the Qing Dynasty, but the ROC government must 
emphatically not sacrifice the nation’s sovereignty just because it wants 
China’s economy to save Taiwan. 
 
The 100th anniversary of the nation’s founding must not be allowed to become the 
“100th anniversary of the sensitive term.” 
 
Hsu Chien-jung is a doctoral candidate at Monash University in 
Australia. 
  
 |