¡@
There¡¦s a battle ragin¡¦, Mr Dylan
Tuesday, Apr 06, 2010, Page 8
After months of high expectations, tour organizers confirmed over the weekend
that music legend Bob Dylan would not be coming to Taiwan. In fact, he won¡¦t be
going to Hong Kong and China either, because Chinese authorities feared the
political message behind some of his songs is ¡§too sensitive.¡¨ After permission
to perform in Shanghai and Beijing was denied, the promoter pulled the other
dates ¡X including Taiwan.
Once again, because of Beijing¡¦s fear of pluralism, an entire region ¡X including
China itself ¡X suffers the deafening silence of censorship, while free countries
like Taiwan are denied the unforgettable experience of seeing the legend perform
live.
This, worryingly, comes at a time when President Ma Ying-jeou (°¨^¤E) and his
Chinese counterparts endeavor to accelerate artistic and cultural exchanges
between Taiwan and China. The more this becomes reality, the more censorship
could become part of our lives. Is this what Taiwanese want for themselves?
An early victim of this catastrophic drift in China¡¦s cultural sphere of
influence was the Taiwanese movie Miao Miao (´ù´ù), which had to be pulled from
the Melbourne International Film Festival last August amid pressure by Beijing
on festival organizers not to screen a film about exiled Uighur leader Rebiya
Kadeer. One of the producers of Miao Miao, as it turns out, was Jet Tone Film
Ltd of Hong Kong.
A similar controversy occurred over the Kadeer documentary 10 Conditions of
Love when Kaohsiung planned to feature it at a movie festival. Beijing
retaliated by canceling hotel reservations and tours to southern Taiwan.
Organizers of the Kaohsiung film festival were undeterred by the threat and the
film was shown, but this came at a cost, including the alienation of the tourism
industry.
It is unfortunate that Dylan¡¦s tour organizers (or maybe the artist himself)
chose to cancel other venues after being barred from performing in Chinese
cities. Aside from denying an unforgettable experience to thousands of music
enthusiasts, this sends the unfortunate signal that Beijing¡¦s dictate extends
outside its borders and applies to some ¡§greater China¡¨ artifice. Repression
won, and rather than fight back by performing in the region, the great American
voice of freedom and resistance chose to be silenced. In the wake of Google¡¦s
decision to pull out of the Chinese market over censorship issues, this turn of
events is disappointing.
Having prevailed over Dylan, there is no knowing what else Beijing will consider
¡§too sensitive¡¨ in the arts, which could leave us with a depleted palette of
artists whose work is deemed acceptable by Beijing. True art risks being
sacrificed, to be replaced by the safe, albeit inane, would-be artists that
populate the airwaves nowadays.
For the sake of artistic integrity, freedom and liberty, Dylan should come to
Taiwan, where there is no doubt the legend would receive a welcome worthy of his
status.
As Dylan put it: ¡§Come senators, congressmen / Please heed the call / Don¡¦t
stand in the doorway / Don¡¦t block up the hall / For he that gets hurt / Will be
he who has stalled / There¡¦s a battle outside / And it¡¦s ragin¡¦.¡¨
The battle is raging and people who cherish their freedoms can¡¦t afford to
stall. There¡¦s a battle outside, and oh, could only the great Bob Dylan heed the
call.
¡@
|