|
Aborigines lose patience over bill
By Loa Iok-sin
STAFF REPORTER
Friday, Apr 30, 2010, Page 3
“Saying that we need to try it first shows distrust in Aborigines’ ability to
govern ourselves.”— Yun Tien-pao, mayor of Jianshih Township
Although it has been 10 years since the first draft bill on Aboriginal autonomy
was completed, the issue of autonomy remains unresolved and was the focus of
criticism from Aboriginal politicians attending the National Aboriginal Policy
Conference yesterday.
It’s been nine years since the last National Aboriginal Policy Conference but
Aboriginal autonomy was still the hottest topic, just as it was then.
“The draft bill on Aboriginal autonomy has been lying there for 10 years, it’s
something for which Aborigines have very high expectations. Do we have to wait
another 10 years before it can be finally passed?’ asked Lin Hsin-yi (林信義),
mayor of Taoyuan County’s mostly Atayal Fusing Township (復興).
“I know people have different ideas about Aboriginal autonomy, and several
versions of the bill have been proposed, but I don’t care which version passes
because we can’t foresee all the problems. We can always fix it later on,” he
said.
“When I visited autonomous regions of indigenous peoples in Canada, they told me
that it took them decades of struggle with some violence to gain autonomy,” Lin
said. “Well, we don’t mind using violent means if that’s what we have to do.”
Several other Aboriginal politicians, including Hsinchu County’s Jianshih
Township (尖石) Mayor Yun Tien-pao (雲天寶), echoed Lin’s impatience.
Yun said he opposed President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) proposal at the conference
that autonomy be implemented “on a trial basis,” saying that Aborigines had
governed themselves for thousands of years before modern state governments
arrived in Taiwan.
“Saying that we need to try it first shows distrust in Aborigines’ ability to
govern ourselves,” he said.
In response, Council of Indigenous Peoples Minister Sun Ta-chuan (孫大川) said that
he fully supported Aboriginal autonomy, because the current administrative
system is eroding Aboriginal culture and harming their political rights. He
promised that a bill on Aboriginal autonomy would be passed within the next two
years.
“The Cabinet is trying to be cautious about autonomy to avoid causing ethnic
tensions in the country. Right now, different agencies have different ideas
about certain details, but we have a consensus on the general direction, so it
won’t be another 10 years before it passes,” Sun said.
“If we can’t get it to pass within the next one or two years, I’d rather just
forget about it,” he said.
Tseng Hua-te (曾華德), convener of the Autonomous Confederation of Paiwan
Aborigines and a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator, was
skeptical.
“I doubt if autonomy can become a reality within two years, because even if we
pass the bill on autonomy, we have to change other laws, including the Financial
Distribution Act [財政收支劃分法], the Administrative Division Act [行政區劃分法], the Public
Debt Act [公共債務法] and human resources regulations,” he said.
Meanwhile, several township mayors also raised concerns about the status of
Aboriginal townships once they become districts in special municipalities
following city-county mergers at the end of the year.
Only Aborigines can be elected as heads of Aboriginal townships, but district
chiefs in cities are appointed by the mayor, so many Aboriginal representatives
are worried that mergers would compromise Aboriginal political rights.
Ministry of the Interior official Luo Jui-ching (羅瑞卿) said the ministry was
considering asking the Executive Yuan to designate districts in special
municipalities that were originally Aboriginal townships as “Aboriginal regions”
to ensure that only Aborigines can serve as district chiefs.
|
