¡@
Executions came out of the blue
Monday, May 03, 2010, Page 8
The government executed four men at 7:30pm on Friday night, ending a moratorium
on executions that had been in place since December 2005.
Premier Wu Den-yi (§d´°¸q) said yesterday that the government was simply upholding
the rule of law and practicing social justice. The country must handle death row
inmates according to the law unless there are legal reasons to justify
suspending executions, he said.
The crimes for which the four were convicted met the current criteria for crimes
meriting capital punishment: kidnapping and murder or multiple murders. However,
whether all the legal requirements for carrying out the death penalty had been
met and the timing of the executions are questionable.
Less than two months ago, former minister of justice Wang Ching-feng (¤ý²M®p)
resigned over the furor that erupted when she refused to enforce the death
penalty. Her successor, Minister of Justice Tseng Yung-fu (´¿«i¤Ò), told a public
hearing on April 21 that the ministry would review the cases of all 44 inmates
on death row and exhaust all measures before conducting executions. He also said
the first executions would most likely take place before the end of the year.
Therefore, given both the moratorium and the Council of Grand Justices¡¦
agreement to hear appeals of death-sentence cases, there was something unseemly
about the rush to enforce the law. The council had given the Taiwan Alliance to
End the Death Penalty (TAEDP), which filed a request for an interpretation on
behalf of the 44 people on death row, until today to submit letters of
authorization from the prisoners.
Government officials have consistently cited opinion poll findings that a
majority of Taiwanese ¡X 70 percent ¡X favor keeping the death penalty. Yet other
polls have found that 53 percent of respondents support replacing the death
penalty with life imprisonment without parole. Sixty-two percent support
commuting a death sentence to life or a long prison term if those convicted
behave well in prison or show remorse, with 88 percent believe the death
sentence could sometimes be handed down erroneously.
On April 8, Tseng told the legislature that even if most people said they
supported the death penalty, the government would still push for abolition,
though like other administration officials, he wouldn¡¦t give a timetable.
News of the executions came on the same day as reports from Lebanon that a
suspect in the murders of four family members had been lynched. A mob beat and
stabbed the suspect to death, dragged his body through the streets so others
could stomp on his corpse and then strung the body on a pole using a butcher¡¦s
hook. The Beirut government condemned the incident and vowed to punish those
responsible, but some villagers quoted by wire agencies appear unrepentant about
taking justice into their own hands.
The right to life should never be subject to opinion polls, just as a lynch mob
should never replace the right to a fair trial. Protection of human rights means
protecting people from shifting public opinion, shifts in political power and
the arbitrary enforcement of justice.
While Friday night¡¦s executions were not lynch mob justice, TAEDP executive
director Lin Hsin-yi¡¦s (ªLªY©É) characterization of them as hasty and furtive was
absolutely spot-on.
¡@
|