|
‘Peace talks’ with PRC a trap — just ask
Tibet
By Peng Ming-min 彭明敏
Thursday, May 06, 2010, Page 8
It has recently been suggested that Taiwan should sign a “peace agreement” with
China in the belief it will help reduce tensions in the Taiwan Strait. In
general, the term “peace agreement” refers to anything aimed at bringing an end
to a bloody conflict such as an armistice signed by warring states, a ceasefire
agreement between two sides in a civil war or methods to resolve a border
dispute with a neighboring nation. Not one of the 192 member nations of the UN
has signed any form of “peace agreement” with Taiwan and yet still somehow
manage to peacefully coexist with Taiwan. The one exception is of course China.
Nobody believes that the problems between Taiwan and China are the result of
Taiwan encroaching on China. The Taiwanese government gave up on its ridiculous
national policy of “reconquering the Mainland” long ago and officially abrogated
the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of National Mobilization
for Suppression of the Communist Rebellion (動員戡亂時期臨時條款) in 1991. Since then,
Taiwan has demonstrated goodwill toward China by conducting business and
investing large amounts of money in the country, so much so that it sometimes
comes across as trying to curry favor with China.
In other words, the tensions in the Taiwan Strait are a direct result of the
threat China poses to Taiwan, a nation over which it has never held sovereignty.
At present, China has more than 1,000 missiles pointing at Taiwan, a number that
continues to increase. China has even promulgated an “Anti-Secession” Law that
is nothing more than a blatant attempt to legitimize its claims to sovereignty
over Taiwan and a legal fig-leaf for widespread efforts to exclude Taiwan from
the international arena.
In the event of a kidnapping, the situation is resolved when the kidnapper
releases the victim unconditionally, there is no question of both sides
negotiating or signing an agreement. If the kidnapper insists on “negotiating,”
he or she does so to extort a ransom and the victim is expected to pay a price
for freedom. This is a perfect metaphor for the nature of cross-strait
relations, with China threatening Taiwan. In truth, all that is required to
secure lasting peace in the Taiwan Strait is for China to renounce the use of
military force against Taiwan. There is no need for China to keep pretending
that “peace talks” are necessary.
China supports “peace talks” because these are the perfect way to force Taiwan
to pay a price — whether belittling its nationhood or forcing it to concede
sovereignty.
What Taiwan should do is openly call China on its misdeeds in front of the
international community. It is important to stand up and explain how China
breaches the principles of freedom, democracy, self determination and human
rights and the extent to which it acts in ways that run counter to the UN
Charter and the norms of international law.
The government must demand that China behave like a modern and civilized nation
and respect the sovereignty of Taiwanese. To recklessly enter into “peace talks”
with China would be to walk into a trap.
We must never forget that in 1951, Tibet signed a “peace agreement” with Beijing
that is similar in form to “one country, two systems.” Within a decade, the
People’s Liberation Army had occupied the country and butchered countless
people. Since then China has moved huge numbers of Han Chinese into Tibet, so
that Tibetans are now a minority in their own country. Tibet’s tragic fate at
the hands of China is something that Taiwanese cannot afford to forget.
Peng Ming-min is a former presidential adviser.
|
