¡@
Beijing should heed Tsai¡¦s call for
dialogue
By Lai I-chung ¿à©É©¾
Friday, May 14, 2010, Page 8
During a forum on the Democratic Progressive Party¡¦s (DPP) 10-year policy
platform on May 2, DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (½²^¤å) raised the idea of holding
an unconditional dialogue with China. While that has been the consistent
position of the DPP, I, as an external observer think it is significant that the
proposal was made at this time.
First, apart from meaning that China will not be able to demand that the DPP
accept the ¡§one China¡¨ principle before dialogue is conducted, ¡§unconditional¡¨
also means the DPP cannot demand that Beijing first relinquish the ¡§one China¡¨
policy or accept the DPP¡¦s view of Taiwanese sovereignty before dialogue is
started. In short, ¡§unconditional¡¨ means that neither party can set
preconditions for talks.
Second, talking about dialogue with China at a forum on the DPP¡¦s 10-year policy
platform not only sends a message to the international community that the DPP is
not unwilling to talk with China, it also shows that the DPP is confident that
it can regain power in the 2012 presidential election. The party is therefore
preparing for a possible electoral win by discussing how to handle relations
with China, and dialogue is of course one important step in this regard.
Third, Tsai said in a subsequent interview that regardless of Chinese President
Hu Jintao¡¦s (JÀAÀÜ) personal stance on the issue, he will still be constrained by
the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This, coupled with Tsai¡¦s neutral comments
about Hu in the same interview, implies that the DPP will take a more pragmatic
approach in its China policy, considering the systemic constraints on
decision-making by individuals. It also shows that the DPP does not plan to back
down and that it is aware that it cannot raise a host of impractical suggestions
to China or harbor impractical expectations.
Fourth, Tsai has shown her determination to lead the DPP¡¦s China policies and
has hinted that China should abandon its practice of inviting individual DPP
members to China. Her comments also hinted at the necessity of establishing a
reasonable set of guidelines for dialogue while at the same time telling China
that it is courting disaster by trying to handle Taiwan through cooperating with
the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
It also shows how Beijing¡¦s passage of the ¡§Anti-Secession¡¨ Law and its attempts
to define Taiwan as a leftover from the Chinese civil war is not only far
removed from reality but also unacceptable to Taiwanese.
Keeping a pragmatic attitude lies at the heart of these four issues. The
pan-blue camp and China have taken Tsai¡¦s words as an indication of possible
plans to visit China. I think this has blurred the issue and the emphasis should
be on whether we can create a feasible mode of interaction between the two
sides. The information contained in Tsai¡¦s remarks is something that Beijing
cannot afford to ignore.
Lai I-chung is an executive committee member of the Taiwan
Thinktank.
¡@
|