|   Government faces credibility crisis By Lin Cho-shui 林濁水Sunday, May 23, 2010, Page 8
 
 On the eve of the second anniversary of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 
inauguration, Taiwan Thinktank released the results of a public opinion poll 
showing that his approval rating stood at a mere 32.1 percent, while 58.6 
percent of respondents said they were dissatisfied with his performance. The top 
reason cited for their dissatisfaction was Ma’s “pro-China policies and neglect 
of national sovereignty.” This was followed by a “poor economy” and “failure to 
care for the general public.” The results of the opinion poll show a fundamental 
flaw in Ma’s policymaking.
 
 The government is leaning toward China not only because of Ma’s personal 
ideology, but also because of his belief in the “one China” paradigm, which has 
limited his perspective and even distorted his understanding of reality.
 
 The “one China” paradigm has led him to believe that China’s economy can develop 
independently of the world economy and that, so long as Taiwan’s economy is 
integrated with China’s, Taiwan will become “a little giant by standing on the 
shoulders of the great giant.”
 
 As early as 2007 or 2008, there were already special media reports describing 
how the financial crisis adversely affected Taiwanese businesspeople in China. 
However, Ma chose to ignore them and continued to praise reliance on China, 
saying there was nothing to fear from the global financial crisis, and 
campaigned for office with his famous “6-3-3” policy (annual GDP growth of 6 
percent, annual per capita income of US$30,000 and an unemployment rate of less 
than 3 percent). He also promised that business in Kaohsiung would take off as 
soon as direct links were established and that China’s policy of encouraging 
people living in rural areas to purchase household appliances would help Taiwan 
ride out the economic storm.
 
 However, because of its blind belief in the “one China” paradigm, the government 
does not seem to care that these election promises have failed one after the 
other, and that its credibility is shot.
 
 Believing that economics is the only solution, the government has overwhelmingly 
increased its stake in China. Despite the fact that unemployment has risen as a 
result of the “active opening up” policy initiated by former president Chen 
Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) administration in 2001 — creating a business model through 
which Taiwanese companies receive orders in Taiwan but manufacture the products 
in China, leading to a flood of Taiwanese businesses relocating to China over 
the past 10 years — the Ma administration has continued to blindly push this 
policy.
 
 In order to pander to Beijing and increase Taiwan’s economic reliance on China, 
the government has repeatedly compromised Taiwan’s sovereignty. When Chinese 
envoy Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) visited Taiwan two years ago, clashes erupted as police 
chased after Taiwanese to stop them from displaying the national flag. The 
Presidential Office then declared a diplomatic truce, which placed cross-strait 
relations above diplomacy and promoted the idea that the two sides of the Taiwan 
Strait are two regions of the same country.
 
 When Typhoon Morakot hit in August last year, the government refused to allow US 
helicopters to take part in rescue efforts because it was afraid of antagonizing 
China. Through all these events, Ma has never been able to explain to the public 
whether he is the president of a sovereign country or the leader of a Chinese 
satellite state.
 
 Improvements in cross-strait relations are a good thing and have met approval in 
Taiwan, but kowtowing so readily to Beijing has also raised public concern and 
increasingly strained government credibility.
 
 It seems the three issues causing the most public discontent are all closely 
related to the “one China” approach. Unless the government can bring about a 
paradigm shift, it will not be able to resolve the credibility crisis for the 
remainder of Ma’s presidency.
 
 Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party 
legislator.
   |