¡@
FILM REVIEW: Don¡¦t judge a book by its
movie
Realism takes a back seat to message and formulaic filmmaking in ¡¥Formosa
Betrayed,¡¦ which takes its title from the memoir of a US diplomat stationed in
Taiwan during the 228 Incident
By Ian Bartholomew
STAFF REPORTER
Friday, Aug 06, 2010, Page 16
¡@
FILM NOTES |
FORMOSA BETRAYED DIRECTED
BY:
ADAM KANE
STARRING:
JAMES VAN DER BEEK (JAKE KELLY), WENDY CREWSON (SUSAN KANE), WILL TIAO
(MING), JOHN HEARD (TOM BRAXTON), TZI MA (KUO), THIENCHAI JAYASVASTI JR
(CAPTAIN CHEN), KENNETH TSANG (GENERAL TSE), ADAM WANG (LEE), MINTITA
WATTANAKUL (MAYSING)
RUNNING TIME:
103 MINUTES
TAIWAN RELEASE:
TODAY |
VIEW THIS PAGE
It is probably appropriate to applaud the fact that Formosa Betrayed has been
given a Taiwan release, but virtually everything else about the film can only
make one shake one¡¦s head. Causes for despair range from accusations of
political pressure brought to bear on the production of the film, already given
coverage recently in the Taipei Times (see stories on Page 3 of this newspaper¡¦s
July 31 and Aug. 2 editions), to the lamentable quality of the adaptation and
filmmaking.
It is only fair to say that many, though far from all, of the problems in
Formosa Betrayed can be attributed to the fact that it had to be shot in
Thailand rather than Taiwan because of budget constraints that purportedly were
the result of political pressure brought to bear by several members of the
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which is unsympathetically represented in the
film.
Formosa Betrayed is loosely inspired by the book of the same title published in
1965 by George H. Kerr, a US Foreign Service staff officer in Taipei at the time
of the 228 Incident in 1947. The book is a mixture of history and memoir that
examines the events around the retrocession of Taiwan to Chinese rule and
America¡¦s not altogether honorable role in the process. The betrayal of the
title refers not just to the dashing of hopes raised by the prospect of Taiwan
being returned from Japanese colonial rule to administration by a Chinese
government, but also the support given to a dictatorial regime by Washington,
which ignored the democratic aspirations of the Taiwanese people for its own
geopolitical interests. This provides background in the same way as Rajiv
Chandrasekaran¡¦s Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq¡¦s Green Zone
provides background for the Paul Greengrass action thriller Green Zone. In other
words, it uses the book as little more than a bit of topical color.
Formosa Betrayed tells the story of Special Agent Kelly (James Van Der Beek), a
junior officer with the FBI who gets sent to Taiwan to observe an investigation
into the murder of Henry Wen, an outspoken critic of the KMT government who was
assassinated while in exile in the US. Kelly quickly realizes that attempts to
smear Wen as a triad member caught up in a gangland dispute are merely cover for
a wide-ranging campaign of political terror by the KMT to silence
anti-government elements. He decides to take things into his own hands, bucking
the reigns that both his hosts and his superiors in the US try to put on him in
order to bring the truth to light. He finds an ally in Ming (Will Tiao), who
wants to get Taiwan¡¦s message out to the world, and pays a terrible price.
Unfortunately, director Adam Kane is no Greengrass, and James Van Der Beek is no
match for Matt Damon as an action hero, and the result is a plodding attempt at
a political thriller that spends too much time on expository dialogue and fails
to deliver any thrills. In addition to being shot in Thailand, the film uses no
Taiwanese actors in any major role (Will Tiao is Taiwanese American and was born
and raised in Kansas). This gives the film an utterly ersatz feel from the
get-go, for the setting is manifestly not Taipei (and could not mistaken for it
by anyone familiar with Taiwan even given the time lapse of 50 years). The
facade is further compromised by the use of Chinese dialogue, as when Hong
Kong-born US-based actor Tzi Ma, playing the role of a senior government
official, gives a formal welcome speech at an official banquet for the newly
arrived American agent in Mandarin so stilted that it would not be out of place
in a speech contest for beginner students at National Taiwan Normal University¡¦s
Mandarin Training Center. The rest of the Chinese dialogue is of a piece with
this. Although setting and sound might be secondary to the importance of getting
a political message out to a wider audience, the poor quality of both seriously
undermines the credibility of the film.
As for the political message, even that ends up getting hopelessly garbled, and
director Kane gets caught up in the lockstep of the Hollywood mainstream
thriller format. The complex ethnic and political issues surrounding
Retrocession get reduced to a generic conflict of good, ordinary people turning
against a corrupt and despotic power, and the lone man of conscience appalled by
the self-interest of the government he serves. There is nothing here that stands
out, either in the story or in the characters involved. The indifferent acting
and flaccid dialogue don¡¦t help.
The sad fact is that to get an idea about what was happening in Taiwan around
Retrocession and the 228 Incident, there is still no rival for Hou Hsiao-hsien¡¦s
(«J§µ½å) A City of Sadness (´d±¡«°¥«), which was made way back in 1989. The best that
can be said of Formosa Betrayed is that it might direct a few people to read the
book, which is available online at www.romanization.com/books/formosabetrayed.
Save your money and go online.
¡@
|