|
Relocation worse than Morakot,
Aborigines claim
By Shih Hsiu-chuan
Staff Reporter
Sunday, Aug 08, 2010, Page 1
A girl wearing a headband with the text “Move
away from disaster, not from our homeland” leans on her father as victims of
Typhoon Morakot demonstrate in front of the Presidential Office yesterday.
PHOTO: LIAO CHEN-HUEI, TAIPEI TIMES
The government’s reconstruction policy after Typhoon Morakot struck in August
last year was a far bigger disaster than the natural calamity because it is
leading to the extinction of Aborigines, Lituan Takilulu, convener of the
Indigenous Peoples Action Coalition of Taiwan, said yesterday.
“Aborigines will never be able to return home. They are compelled to live in
separate places. We are on our way to extinction,” Lituan said at a forum held
by the Taiwan Association of University Professors on the eve of the first
anniversary of Morakot.
Lituan, a Rukai priest, said Aborigines are not scared of natural disasters,
because “disasters are part of the lives of Aborigines,” adding that the most
important problem facing Aborigines was that “people are dispersed” and
“connections with fellow tribe members are cut off.”
About 72 percent, or 13,911, of the 19,191 people in 6,316 households were
living in areas deemed “unsafe” by the government after it investigated 291
sites in the wake of the catastrophe. Of these, 7,484 people in 2,433 households
resettled in permanent houses, while 11,707 in 3,883 households remained at
their original place of residence.
Government officials cited statistics to rebut allegations of forced relocation
while continuing to reason with Aborigines to move out of their mountain
villages, saying that “migration is the best way to avoid the consequences of
climate change,” as President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has said.
Lituan said Aboriginal victims were compelled to leave their hometown within one
week of the typhoon and asked to decide within a short period whether to
resettle in permanent houses.
“More than 80 percent of Aboriginal victims signed up for permanent houses, [but
did so] when they had no idea about the conditions in their villages. Some tribe
members then found safe places in their villages and wanted to go back, but they
were not allowed to,” Lituan said.
There also was no financial support for Aborigines who wished to rebuild their
homes in their original villages, he said.
“Some people borrowed money from friends to buy land to resettle,” Lituan said.
The government’s reconstruction policy was to force Aborigines to relocate in
permanent houses, which not only made Aborigines leave their lands, but will
also compound the breakup of Aborigine families, he said.
If people establish their own families through marriage or other means, they
can’t live in the community, where the number of houses are limited, and must
move out, becoming separated from their families, Lituan said.
Elan Pavavajung, a Paiwan tribe member who produced a documentary on how
Aborigines living in Davalan, Sandimen Township (三地門), Pingtung County, dealt
with the disaster, said older Aborigines blamed widespread deforestation and
reforestation by the Forestry Bureau and road-widening for the catastrophe.
|
