Ma still playing the blame game
Thursday, Aug 12, 2010, Page 8
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is looking more and more like a
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) version of former president Chen Shui-bian
(陳水扁). During the 2008 presidential campaign, Ma constantly criticized Chen for
his feeble governing and for blaming every problem on 50 years of corrupt KMT
rule. Now, when the Ma administration is critical of issues like the
environmental assessment of the Central Taiwan Science Park and the dilapidated
state of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport, it resorts to blaming the Chen
administration. How does this make Ma any different from Chen?
The development of the third stage of the Central Taiwan Science Park was
approved by the DPP government, and at the time, the DPP was indeed guilty of
making some mistakes. However, the protests against the science park development
are not a recent phenomenon, they have been going on for some time. Local
residents have repeatedly told the government and the media about how they have
been treated unfairly and how the government has pushed for development without
the legally required environmental impact assessment. They have made their point
clear with protests at the park’s Taichung branch, the park administration, the
Environmental Protection Administration, the gate of the National Science
Council and through the courts.
After two years of hard work by the residents, the media are finally taking
notice, the courts have accepted their complaints and the government must now
take their protests seriously. With the problem out in the open, the Ma
administration chalks the issue up to a decision by the previous government. Is
this really an acceptable excuse?
The Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport was one of former dictator Chiang
Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) 10 infrastructure projects. It is 31 years old, dilapidated
and ill-managed. Foreign visitors are fed up with it, and Taiwanese are
embarrassed by it. Ma says the DPP shoudl have taken better care of it. Is this
really an acceptable excuse?
Renovating the airport would take about a year. If the KMT felt that the main
gateway to Taiwan was an important issue, it could have begun renovations as
soon as it regained power. If it had, renovations would have been completed by
now. Problems like the poor and overpriced restaurants, broken baggage carts and
clogged toilets are all a matter of management. To blame the previous government
for these problems is a bit far-fetched.
The KMT has been in power for more than two years. Any national problems,
regardless of how old, are now its responsibility. Many of the initiatives the
DPP undertook while in office lacked public support, and they were voted out of
office as a result. With the KMT back in power, the DPP has paid the price of
its mistakes, and it should no longer be responsible for the nation’s problems.
While Ma may have strengthened the fighting spirit of dark-blue supporters with
his criticism of the DPP, a larger number of voters feel he has abandoned the
presidential high ground. By fanning the political divide and sowing ethnic
discord, the presidency has been lowered to the level of crass party politics.
It has become difficult to tell Ma apart from Chen. Ma is enamored of
electioneering and politically motivated stunts. He will eventually become
hostage to dark-blue interests and lose public support.
Can Ma differentiate himself from Chen? Well, he could always stop shifting
responsibility and start admitting that his government could do better. He could
also push for an immediate resolution of environmental and developmental issues
and restore the airport to international standards. However, the answer to the
question boils down this: Does Ma have the competence and conviction to change?
|