¡@
ECFA must guarantee free-trade
agreements
By Li Ching-lieh §õ¼y¯P
Thursday, Aug 12, 2010, Page 8
Two Chinese vice ministers of commerce, Gao Hucheng (°ªªê«°) and
Jiang Zengwei («¸¼W°¶), have commented on the Economic Cooperation Framework
Agreement (ECFA) that was signed by Taiwan and China at the end of June.
The agreement was an arrangement made ¡§under the precondition of ¡¥one China¡¦ and
the ¡¥1992 consensus,¡¦¡¨ Gao said.
Regarding the question of Taiwan signing free-trade agreements (FTAs) with other
countries, Jiang said: ¡§As long as it doesn¡¦t contravene the ¡¥1992 consensus,¡¦
we can make reasonable arrangements through cross-strait negotiations.¡¨
These comments signal that, having signed the ECFA, Taiwan has lost the right to
make its own decisions about signing FTAs.
There is nothing surprising about the two ministers¡¦ remarks, since they
represent China¡¦s longstanding attitude. The problem is, China¡¦s viewpoint has
now been put into practice by the ECFA because the current version of the pact
contains no provision stating that it will not affect the two signatories¡¦ right
to sign FTAs. It is not hard to imagine the difficulties Taiwan will face as a
result of the pact, with both Taipei and Beijing quoting the agreement as proof
when lobbying various countries as to whether they can sign separate FTAs with
Taiwan.
For this reason, I suggest that an article confirming the right to sign FTAs
should be added to the ECFA. The article should be clearly worded to say that
the agreement does not in any way affect the rights of the two signatories to
hold talks or negotiate and sign FTAs with other WTO members.
An article worded in this way would not call on China to state that it agrees to
or recognizes Taiwan¡¦s right to sign FTAs because Taiwan had this inherent right
that no one can interfere with. It would not even demand that China promise not
to interfere or lay down obstacles when Taiwan exercises this right.
That is, China can carry on as it did before ¡X there is no demand that it should
change its ways. Taiwan only needs to insist that the text of the agreement
should say the two signatories¡¦ existing rights in this respect will not be
affected. There is no need to add to or subtract from this right or for China to
make any concessions. One would have thought government-appointed negotiators
could at least have done this much.
The ECFA, as it stands, clearly fails to uphold Taiwan¡¦s right to make its own
decisions with regard to signing FTAs. Under the current version, when Taiwan
wants to sign such agreements in future, it will probably have to just accept
arrangements based on the precondition of ¡§one China,¡¨ when other countries
demand it.
It is obvious that the ECFA, as it stands, and FTAs based on it, touch on the
issue of Taiwan¡¦s independent decision-making and sovereignty. The ECFA is not
just a matter of people¡¦s livelihood and economics, as the government claims.
That being the case, I ask: Can the ECFA, as it stands, be allowed to pass
without being subject to public approval through a referendum?
Li Ching-lieh is a professor of electrical engineering at
Tamkang University.
¡@
|