¡@
Lofty rhetoric leads to nowhere
By J. Michael Cole ±FÁıN
Monday, Aug 16, 2010, Page 8
The pages of this newspaper and other liberal publications
are filled with beautiful slogans about the need to ¡§protect¡¨ Taiwan based on
lofty principles such as democracy, justice and human rights. Commendable as
these prescriptions may be, in and of themselves they are impotent in the face
of the present challenges confronting this nation.
Although the intentions of the opinion writers who propose such measures are
undoubtedly honorable, their prose often lacks the rigorous intellectual
inquisitiveness that would give them true meaning, leaving us with little more
than a constellation of presumptuous abstracts. In fact, more often than not,
the ideals they espouse are at best a means to contrast what the authors are
trying to protect with the entity that poses the most formidable threat to it ¡X
China.
However, using words to describe what China is not is hardly the kind of call to
action that will ward off the threat to Taiwan¡¦s continued existence.
An understanding of the opponent makes this abundantly clear. Sloganeering
doesn¡¦t gain traction with the Chinese Communist Party and the politicians and
business leaders in Taipei who seem inclined to be co-opted by the Chinese. It
doesn¡¦t move, sway or frighten them.
One should be careful, though, not to confuse slogans with ¡§soft power,¡¨ the
term that seeks to explain a state¡¦s ability to bring about behavioral change in
other states by virtue of the attractiveness of its social mores and cultural
practices. Soft power, if applied wisely and with clear purpose, can effect
change that is beneficial to the state exercising it.
The problem with ideals like justice and democracy is that they are merely
formless concepts existing in nature; without direction and willful purpose,
they are neither here nor there. Absent a stated objective, they cannot
constitute ¡§soft power¡¨ and will fail to achieve any effect whatsoever.
Therefore, what is required is not so much a parroting of Western liberal ideals
¡X which Beijing sheds like water off a duck¡¦s back ¡X but rather an action plan
with clearly stated objectives that can translate into concrete acts ¡X both
pre-emptive and reactive ¡X of ¡§soft¡¨ and, if needed, ¡§hard¡¨ power.
For obvious reasons, this prescription requires a lot more homework, since
looking for solutions in the real world confronts us to all kinds of
practicalities. However, if we are to achieve our objective of saving Taiwan
from what is quickly shaping into an ominous fate, this is what is required of
us. Anything short of this is intellectual sloth, a facile churning out of
concepts that ultimately does nothing more than deresponsibilize the author
while stating which side of the divide he or she sits on.
Ironically, the abundance of vague concepts that have been repeated ad nauseam
in the past few years has also been self-defeating, as it has served to turn
Taiwan into an abstract idea abroad, rather than an actual plot of land with 23
million people inhabiting it. In many ways, this is exactly what Beijing has
sought, and the many academics who care and write about Taiwan should be
horrified that their work is making this objective more achievable for the
communists.
Abstractions are easy to ignore, and if Taiwan¡¦s would-be defenders paint the
issues as such to their audience, then it will be immensely difficult to
convince the rest of the world to care about Taiwan¡¦s fate, let alone take
action to ensure a positive outcome.
Nothing gets resolved in the ivory tower, especially in a situation like
Taiwan¡¦s where the ¡§other side¡¨ plays by different rules, rules that are solidly
grounded in reality and which come in the form of investments, trade agreements,
military deployments, backroom negotiations and so on. We can scream ¡§human
rights¡¨ and ¡§democracy¡¨ all we want. We can even shake in anger when our
constitutional ¡§right¡¨ to hold a referendum on the Economic Cooperation
Framework Agreement (ECFA) is yet again denied by the authorities. However,
without concrete acts, those phantoms will be as useful as brandishing a flower
at the cold, crushing tracks of tanks storming the beaches.
After years of deceiving ourselves into thinking that China¡¦s opening to the
rest of the world would liberalize and democratize it by dint of exposure to
Western ideals, we should know better than to expect that the small army of
academics who would defend Taiwan against the illiberal behemoth can be any more
successful.
Writing in 1839, Edward Bulwer-Lytton¡¦s adage ¡§the pen is mightier than the
sword¡¨ may have rung nicely in his play, but in reality if no one¡¦s reading, the
pen is nothing but a scribble seen by no one, wasting at the bottom of a dark
well.
Let us descend to Earth from our towering ideals and meet the challenge that
awaits us with our feet firmly planted on the ground, and our minds filled with
action.
J. Michael Cole is deputy news editor at the Taipei Times.
¡@
|