20100902 Premier’s labor stance attacked

Premier’s labor stance attacked

POOR WORD CHOICE?: A comment by Wu Den-yih was called a setback for the labor movement. He said people needed to develop a sense of humor

By Shelley Huang, Vincent Y. Chao and Flora Wang
Staff Reporters
Thursday, Sep 02, 2010, Page 1

Central Police University president Hou Yu-ih, left, accompanied by the student inspection honor guard, motions to Premier Wu Den-yih, center, at the university’s opening ceremony in Taoyuan County yesterday.

PHOTO: CHOU MIN-HUNG, TAIPEI TIMES

Labor groups and opposition lawmakers expressed anger toward Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) yesterday over his comment that the inventor of unpaid leave should receive a Nobel prize.

The premier’s effort to downplay the incident did little to quell the anger.

“Premier Wu should apologize to all workers or step down. Treating workers like they are disposable should not be legally allowed,” said Son Yu-lian (孫友聯), secretary-general of the Taiwan Labour Front, referring to Wu’s remark on Tuesday during a meeting with firms that won the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ award for creating substantial job opportunities.

Wu said those who created the system deserved the Nobel Prize because the system helped businesses retain ties to their employees amid the global economic crisis, without having to pay a lot of money to lay off staff, with the added benefit that employees could return to their jobs when the economy improved.

Many high-tech and manufacturing companies put their workers on unpaid leave, with the result that salaries fell close to or below the minimum wage level. As many as 240,000 workers were on unpaid leave in March last year, a period in which firms slashed production targets because of falling demand.

Labor activists called the premier “brain dead,” saying he was insensitive to workers’ plight.

Taiwan Confederation of Trade Unions secretary-general Hsieh ­Chuang-chih (謝創智) said that if there were a Nobel prize for those who caused the most destruction to labor rights, the inventor of unpaid leave would be a sure winner.

“The premier himself has said that if workers on unpaid leave were counted as unemployed, then jobless rates would soar to 8 percent rather than 5 percent,” Hsieh said. “So it is not surprising that the government has praised the concept of unpaid leave because it paints a false picture of prosperity.”

While some companies were on the brink of collapse and could not survive without reducing labor costs, many others enjoyed huge profit margins, but joined the wave of unpaid leave to take advantage of the labor savings.

Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers called Wu’s comment a setback for the labor movement and asked him to retract his comment, apologize to workers nationwide or resign.

DPP Legislator Chen Ting-fei (陳亭妃) said the comment showed just how out of touch Wu was with the rest of the country. The government should be more focused on economic recovery instead of trying to trim back hard-won concessions from the working class, Chen said.

“These remarks come at a time when so many families have suffered from these unpaid holidays … so many people can’t pay their mortgage and are concerned about their next paycheck,” Chen said.

DPP Legislator Huang Wei-cher (黃偉哲) suggested Wu trying some unpaid leave himself.

“If Wu thinks that this idea should win a Nobel Prize … he should immediately take a two month unpaid holiday to see how it feels,” Huang said. “This might be of even greater benefit to Taiwan’s society and economy.”

DPP spokesperson Tsai Chi-chang (蔡其昌) said the party opposed Wu’s stance because the premier had failed to take into account the growing difference between the “haves and have-nots,” and unpaid leave unfairly benefited corporate interests.

KMT Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) joined in the criticism, saying Wu was disrespectful to laborers and had “hurt laborers’ feelings.”

However, KMT Legislator Ho Tsai-feng (侯彩鳳) defended Wu, saying the premier might be saying that the system helped employees secure their jobs amid the downturn.

Ho said the inventor of unpaid leave did deserve to be honored, but added that she hoped companies would no longer use the system because forcing employees to take unpaid leave was the same as forcing them to take a pay cut.

Meanwhile, Wu tried to defend himself yesterday, saying he did not really mean to recommend the ­companies try for a Nobel Prize.

“[The system] helped [laborers] keep their labor insurance and maintained companies’ ties with the employees amid harsh economic times. [Employees] can go back to work afterwards,” Wu said when approached by reporters for a comment. “God … People need to have more of a sense of humor.”