|
DPP lawmakers slam 'revisionist' history
curriculum
By Vincent Y. Chao
Staff Reporter
Tuesday, Sep 14, 2010, Page 1
Opposition lawmakers and academics accused the government of
revisionism and seeking to “brainwash” students after the Ministry of Education
yesterday unveiled revisions to the high school curriculum that prioritize
China’s history over that of Taiwan.
The Ministry of Education will hold the first of several public hearings on the
proposed history course revision in Taipei City on Thursday, overriding concerns
that the new changes will subject students to yet another course overhaul, the
second in the past five years.
The latest, which has been delayed since last year, will increase class time
spent teaching Chinese history by 50 percent.
In accordance with the draft, the ministry plans to have high school students
take one semester of Taiwanese history, one-and-a-half semesters of Chinese
history and one-and-a-half semesters on world history in their first and second
years.
If passed, the new curriculum could come into force in 2012.
At present, high school students spend one semester on Taiwanese history,
another semester on Chinese history and two semesters on world history.
Students majoring in liberal arts are required to take history on special topics
in their senior year, but students majoring in science are not.
Under the proposal, class time spent on Chinese history will increase to 24
weeks — equivalent to one-and-a-half semesters.
According to a preliminary introduction of the revision documents, the primary
aim of the proposed changes is to assist students in “understanding their own
cultural roots and help create a sense of self-recognition.”
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said in a statement that it opposed the
proposal and called the de-emphasis on Taiwan a return to the KMT’s
authoritarian roots.
“In the path to democracy, history courses have been adjusted to gradually focus
more on Taiwan, but this former authoritarian government continues to use crude
measures to shove its Chinese roots into the [education system],” DPP
spokesperson Lin Yu-chang (林右昌) said.
DPP Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲), who sits on the Education and Culture
Committee, said the ministry intended to brainwash high school students in
preparation for the KMT’s planned unification with China.
“This is unacceptable,” Kuan said.
In response, KMT Legislator Hung Hsiu-chi (洪秀柱), who is also a member of the
committee, said the KMT administration was simply trying to “rectify” the former
DPP government’s “de-sinicization” policy.
“Descendants should never forget their ancestors or the ancestors’ culture,”
Hung said.
Minister of Education Wu Ching-chi (吳清基) urged the public to respect the
expertise of academics who drafted the guidelines rather than “appeal to
political ideology.”
Wu said the ministry would hold four public hearings and invite the public to
deliberate over the draft before it is submitted to the ministry’s Curriculum
Guidelines Development Committee for final review.
The ministry plans to hold the hearings throughout the country between Thursday
and Sunday.
Pro-independence groups are planning to protest Thursday’s public hearing at
Zhongshan Girls High School in Taipei and have planned additional rallies for
the other public hearings.
Asked for comment on the implications of the proposed curriculum, Chen Yi-shen
(陳儀深), the chairperson of the Taiwan Association of University Professors,
questioned whether it was excessively focused on China, a country that is
relevant historically, but one that progressively less Taiwanese students
identify with.
“There are undoubtedly different historical viewpoints ... but the trend should
be a growing emphasis on Taiwan and then our neighbors in Asia and the world — a
category that China should fall into,” he told the Taipei Times by phone.
Chen, who called the revision “extremely controversial,” has been a vocal
opponent of the proposed changes, claiming that it is politically motivated and
potentially damaging to senior high school students that need a more consistent
course outline that is not subject to modifications every few years.
Other contentious revisions in the proposal include an additional emphasis on
early Chinese rule over Taiwan in the Three Kingdoms era after the fall of the
Han Dynasty. Additionally, the revision will include a segment on Taiwanese
traveling to China and fighting against the Japanese in World War II.
Despite saying the content was not necessarily wrong, National Chengchi
University history professor Hsueh Hua-yuan (薛化元) said the subjects should come
under further review before being released to the students.
“The truth is that Taiwanese did go to China during World War II — but is its
emphasis [disproportionate] to the larger picture?” he asked.
The shortened world history textbook would also be detrimental to Taiwanese
students, who already do not spend enough time learning about Taiwan’s Asian
neighbors, he said.
The new senior high school guidelines have been a key matter of contention
between President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration and opposition lawmakers
since late 2008 when the ministry said it would hold back the release of new
outlines for Chinese and history classes.
A meeting of a ministry development committee for high school education courses
on Oct. 17, 2008, decided to implement 21 new course guidelines proposed by
former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) administration, but made further
revisions to the two classes.
The announcement immediately upset pro-independence groups, who later protested
in front of the ministry, expressing concern that the courses would be updated
to reflect Ma’s more China-friendly attitude at the expense of a more
Taiwan-centric education system.
“To a certain extent, the new changes reflect this,” former Southern Taiwan
Society president Cheng Cheng-iok (鄭正煜) said.
A keen observer of the new changes, he said there were clear political motives
for the revision and accused the government of using education to “distort
Taiwanese history.”
“We should be looking at China from a Taiwanese viewpoint, not the other way
around,” he said.
“Our history should also equally include parts from the Dutch and Japanese
occupations in the past,” Cheng added, referring to Taiwan’s other historical
foreign rulers.
|
