¡@
Taiwanese identity in the spotlight
Maybe it¡¦s something in the water, but Chinese officials have developed the bad
habit of airing their extreme nationalistic tendencies with a little more
boldness when they find themselves in Japan, resulting in situations that often
undermine Beijing¡¦s objectives.
The latest such incident occurred on Saturday at the 23rd Tokyo International
Film Festival, when the head of the Chinese delegation, Jiang Ping (¦¿¥),
accompanied by a robotic-looking Chinese actress, attempted to drill into the
heads of the Taiwanese delegation that they were all Chinese. Faced with the
refusal of Government Information Office Department of Motion Pictures director
Chen Chih-kuan (³¯§Ó¼e), who headed the Taiwanese delegation, and the organizers of
the film festival to change Taiwan¡¦s name to ¡§Taiwan, China¡¨ or ¡§Chinese
Taipei,¡¨ an outraged Jiang announced that China was partially pulling out of the
festival.
The Chinese delegation decided to pull out of festival-related events because
the organizers ¡§covertly violated the ¡¥One China¡¦ policy Jiang was quoted as
saying by the Global Times, a Chinese Communist Party-run publication.
Interestingly, Jiang was also quoted as saying that the spat, and the decision
to pull out of the film festival, had ¡§nothing to do with our Taiwan
compatriots¡¨ and was rather ¡§the fault of the Tokyo organizers.¡¨
Given Beijing¡¦s silence on the matter, added to the fact that the news was
covered in a state-owned publication, we can assume that Chinese authorities
gave tacit approval to Jiang¡¦s actions and that he wasn¡¦t simply being
overzealous. What this also points to is China¡¦s efforts to portray Taiwanese as
being on their side: It was all Tokyo¡¦s fault, as it refused to respect the ¡§one
China¡¨ policy. In the process, Chen¡¦s protest and clear declaration that he and
his delegation were Taiwanese, not Chinese, was ignored, as if the opinion of
the principal party in the equation ¡X Taiwanese ¡X didn¡¦t count.
There is no doubt that Chen¡¦s commendable resistance to Chinese bullying, rather
than that of the film organizers, was the main reason behind Jiang¡¦s fit, but no
sooner had the delegate finished foaming at the mouth than party-controlled
publications endeavored to portray this as the continuation of Japanese
intervention in China¡¦s domestic affairs.
In fact, the same Global Times article felt it necessary to add that the film
festival is being held ¡§amid simmering tensions between Tokyo and Beijing over
the sovereignty of the Diaoyutai [³¨³½¥x] Islands.¡¨ Nearly half the article focuses
on recent developments surrounding the contested islands, as if the simmering
crisis were the real cause of the walkout at the film festival.
The article, coming as it does with Beijing¡¦s blessing, highlights yet again the
fact that China¡¦s strategy for the annexation of Taiwan does not take the will
of the people into consideration. This it does to such an extent that when
Taiwanese express their opposition, their voices are silenced altogether. The
root of the problem ¡X Taiwanese identity and resistance to irredentism ¡X is
taken out of the equation, and the anger is deflected toward an external enemy,
Japan.
However hard and often they try, however angrily, Chinese officials will not
change the fact that their so-called ¡§Taiwanese compatriots¡¨ are unwilling to
forsake their identity, even as relations between the two countries improve in
certain areas. Chinese tourists may come in droves, students can enter our
classrooms and Chinese firms can invest all they want in various sectors of the
Taiwanese economy, but when it comes to identity, Chen put it as simply as one
could near the ¡§green carpet¡¨ in Tokyo: ¡§You are Chinese, I am Taiwanese.¡¨
¡@
|