¡@
Aung San Suu Kyi, Liu connected
Myanmar¡¦s democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi has finally been released from house
arrest after 15 years. Although the Nobel Peace Prize laureate has gained her
freedom for now, her future and that of Myanmar¡¦s democratic movement remain
shrouded in difficulties.
The junta released Aung San Suu Kyi partly because the term of her house arrest
had ended, and also because the military-backed Union Solidarity and Development
Party, having gained a dubious victory in the Nov. 7 national elections, hopes
to use her release to give legitimacy to the government that it will form, and
to alleviate pressure from abroad.
However, Aung San Suu Kyi rejected the poll on the grounds of blatant
manipulation by the junta, and she has not ruled out challenging the result
through the courts. Now that she is free, Myanmar¡¦s opposition forces are sure
to rally anew. Possible outcomes include anything from the ouster of the
government to the return of Aung San Suu Kyi to detention. Her release, then,
signals only the calm before the storm.
Myanmar¡¦s despotic rulers are so lacking in ability to govern that they
habitually use force to make the Burmese submit to their rule. Any resistance is
ruthlessly crushed. Wherever dissidents raise their voices, they may be deprived
of their personal freedom or even killed.
The junta has held Aung San Suu Kyi under house arrest for 15 of the last 21
years. It even took advantage of an American¡¦s swim to her house to extend her
detention by 18 months and thereby keep her out of the election. The junta wants
to isolate Aung San Suu Kyi and prevent democratic forces from achieving the
unity to enable them to effectively challenge the regime. In reality, however,
the longer the junta kept Aung San Suu Kyi locked up, the more she was admired
by Burmese and respected around the world. By imprisoning Aung San Suu Kyi, the
junta locked itself out of the world community and isolated itself from its own
people.
China is another example of an autocratic government that suppresses democrats
and dissidents. This year¡¦s Nobel Peace Prize is to be awarded to jailed
democracy advocate Liu Xiaobo (¼B¾åªi). Beijing will not allow Liu or his wife, Liu
Xia (¼BÁø), to attend next month¡¦s award ceremony, just as Aung San Suu Kyi was
prevented from attending when she won the prize in 1991.
However, China¡¦s obstruction will not lessen the honor in any way. On the
contrary, Liu¡¦s absence from the ceremony will confirm the correctness of the
Nobel Peace Prize Committee¡¦s decision to give him the prize and justify his
sacrifices.
Originally Liu was just one of many Chinese pro-democracy dissidents. He was
neither the most important nor the most influential. Ironically, it was his
arrest and imprisonment for initiating the Charter 08 democracy manifesto that
focused attention on him at home and abroad.
Before the decision to give Liu the peace prize was announced, the Chinese
government put pressure on the Norwegian committee not to award the prize to
him. Once the announcement was made, Beijing blocked all news about it in China,
and has pressurized EU leaders to skip the award ceremony. These moves will not
silence calls for freedom and democracy in China. On the contrary, they will
create a ¡§Chinese Aung San Suu Kyi¡¨ and provide a new focus for China¡¦s
democracy movement.
¡@
|