¡@
China pans bid to ¡¥embarrass¡¦ it
COLD WAR?The only other time in history that a Nobel Peace
Prize was awarded in absentia was in 1936 when a pacifist journalist from Nazi
Germany got the prize
AFP, BEIJING
People sign a petition supporting jailed Nobel
Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo in Hong Kong on Friday.
PHOTO: AFP
China¡¦s state media yesterday lashed out at the Nobel Peace
Prize committee for the ¡§political farce¡¨ of recognizing Liu Xiaobo (¼B¾åªi) after
an empty chair stood in for the jailed dissident in Oslo.
Beijing said Friday¡¦s ceremony in the Norwegian capital, where the prize was
presented in absentia to the imprisoned democracy activist, was ¡§political
theater¡¨ and a product of a ¡§Cold War mentality.¡¨
¡§Honoring someone the government dislikes may serve to embarrass China in this
year¡¦s case, but that is almost all,¡¨ the China Daily, an English-language
government mouthpiece said in an editorial yesterday. ¡§Embarrassing as it may
be, the fanfare in Oslo offers a rare opportunity to update and enrich the
diplomatic outlook of ordinary Chinese. Not everyone in the world wants China¡¦s
social and political stability to continue.¡¨
Liu, a writer who has advocated political reform in China for more than two
decades, was jailed in December last year for 11 years on subversion charges
after co--authoring Charter 08, a bold petition calling for change.
Beijing has reacted with fury to the award, describing the Norwegian Nobel
Committee as ¡§clowns¡¨ and threatening that countries would face unspecified
¡§consequences¡¨ if they did not stay away from the ceremony.
It also barred the jailed dissident or a representative from traveling to Oslo
to receive the award.
The China Daily editorial played down the prize¡¦s significance, saying the award
was ¡§hardly worth the fuss and hoopla.¡¨
¡§Quite a few Westerners cherish the naive hope that the prize will ¡¥enlighten
the Chinese on human rights¡¦ and instigate the changes they wish to see in the
country,¡¨ the editorial said. ¡§They have been too preoccupied with their own
fantasies to realize what is happening in the real world.¡¨
In a commentary yesterday, the Xinhua news agency cited a mid-October poll by
the Chinese -Communist Party¡¦s Global Times newspaper that indicated 77.1
percent of respondents did not know who had won the peace prize.
It did not mention, however, that the poll ¡X whose questions did not name Liu ¡X
was conducted after a week-long state media blackout on reporting about the
award.
¡§The whole event has become an out-and-out political farce,¡¨ the Xinhua
commentary said.
¡§It¡¦s unimaginable that such a farce, the like of which is more commonly seen in
cults, is being staged on the civilized continent of Europe,¡¨ the Global Times
said in an earlier commentary.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu («¸·ì), speaking as the ceremony to
award this year¡¦s Peace Prize to Liu was taking place in Oslo, said the event
¡§cannot represent the overall majority of the people of the world.¡¨
She reiterated Beijing¡¦s insistence that the award to Liu was an attempt to
foment unrest in China and bring political instability to the world¡¦s most
populous nation.
¡§This kind of political theater will never shake the determination and the
confidence of the people of China to uphold the road of socialism with Chinese
characteristics,¡¨ she said.
Nobel Committee chairman Thorbjoern Jagland placed this year¡¦s peace prize on an
empty chair on Friday as last year¡¦s laureate, US President Barack Obama, led
calls for Liu to be set free.
It was only the second time in the history of the prize that no one had been at
the ceremony to collect the award.
The first time was in 1936 when German journalist and pacifist Carl von
Ossietzky was locked up in a Nazi concentration camp.
In China, authorities blacked out coverage of the event, cutting off live
broadcasts of the event by CNN and the BBC.
Many activists and dissidents were either unaccounted for or under strict
surveillance before the ceremony, rights groups said.
¡@
|