ˇ@
Quake offers lessons for Taiwan
The strongest earthquake ever measured in Japan ˇX at 8.9 on the Richter Scale ˇX
struck off the coast of northeastern Honshu on Friday and was followed by a
massive tsunami. Thousands of people are reported dead and tens of thousands are
missing, as the number of people reported injured keeps rising. The earthquake
destroyed buildings and bridges, and the tsunami drove as far as 10km inland,
washing away houses, cars and roads in its path. Factories caught fire,
transportation and communication lines were broken and at least one nuclear
reactor exploded in Fukushima Prefecture, setting off a partial meltdown.
These disasters have caught the worldˇ¦s attention, and Taiwan, one of Japanˇ¦s
closest neighbors, must show its concern by providing practical relief and
reconstruction assistance.
The disaster is also a warning for Taiwan, where earthquakes are frequent. The
Japanese quake, with its epicenter off the coast of Miyagi Prefecture, was 256
times stronger than the 921 earthquake that caused devastation in Taiwanˇ¦s
Nantou County early on Sep. 21, 1999. Many people are now wondering whether our
disaster prevention system and relief mechanisms could handle an earthquake of
this magnitude. In this respect, we can learn a great deal from the way Japan
has handled its latest disaster.
First, Japanˇ¦s excellent earthquake early warning system gave a one-minute
warning via text messages and a public broadcasting system, and this allowed
many people to get out of danger, cutting the number of casualties.
Second, the Japanese authorities frequently hold earthquake response exercises.
The well-practiced government departments were quick to respond and ordinary
people got themselves out of danger in an orderly manner instead of panicking,
which would have only worsened the losses. Those who had no vehicles, food or
shelter lined up for supplies and transportation or to be assigned a temporary
place to stay. Shops and hotels made no attempt to profit from the disaster,
instead giving away food and drinks or offering accommodation free of charge.
The Japanese public are to be admired for their self--control and politeness.
Japanˇ¦s state broadcaster, NHK, issued non-stop tsunami and aftershock warnings,
calmly offering advice as to how to get out of danger. Experts were on hand to
help people get the fullest possible understanding of what was going on and how
best to respond.
In contrast, many Taiwanese news outlets have focused primarily on scenes of
devastation, along with commentary from the same old pundits who have opinions
on anything from politics and economics, to crime and natural disasters.
Evidently, news reporting in Taiwan has not matured beyond the stage of
infotainment.
Taiwan, like Japan, sits on the earthquake belt that runs all around the Pacific
Rim and it has an average of 18,500 earthquakes, felt and unfelt, each year.
Taiwan would do well to observe and learn from the way the Japanese government
and public have responded to their quake disaster. The tsunami and explosion at
the Fukushima nuclear power plant have both given Taiwan cause for alarm. Our
government immediately convened an interdepartmental disaster response
conference to discuss how the Japanese quake might possibly affect Taiwan and
what to do if the wind dumps radioactive dust on our territory. At the level of
passive response, the government has acted quite quickly, but a plan for a
disaster alarm and information system is still on the Cabinetˇ¦s drawing board.
With no single department dedicated to disaster prevention and response, our
rescue and relief resources cannot be effectively integrated. Next time Taiwan
is hit directly by a natural disaster, it may be more than we can handle.
ˇ@
|