|
Red Cross criticized
for delay in sending Japan disaster funds
By Vincent Y. Chao / Staff Reporter
The Red Cross Society of the Republic of China (ROC), which has raised nearly
NT$1.7 billion (US$58.5 million) for disaster victims in Japan, more than all
other Taiwanese charities combined, is facing criticism that most of the money
has yet to leave Taiwan.
The complaints that only about a quarter of the money earmarked for Japan had
been given to charitable aid efforts by yesterday came as attention focused on
how the organization is managing the fund and how it plans to allocate the
money.
¡§Every dollar we receive ultimately goes to Japan, but the donation drive is
still ongoing and as a result, the dates and numbers are still subject to
changes,¡¨ Red Cross Society of the ROC deputy secretary-general Lin Hsiu-fen
(ªL¨qªâ) said.
The organization, partially state-run, has raised more than half of the NT$3
billion ¡X including NT$300 million given by the government ¡X pledged in aid by
Taiwanese for Japan after a devastating earthquake and tsunami on March 11.
However, figures from the organization show that only US$15 million has been
transferred to the Japanese Red Cross Society, the bulk of which was only wired
yesterday after an internal decision was made on March 31.
The rest of the funds are sitting in a bank account as the group awaits more
information on the kind of aid that Japanese relief groups require, officials
with the Red Cross Society of the ROC said.
The interest earned from the money would be included in the final donation, Lin
said.
However, the delay has infuriated online groups, with more than 20,000 people,
as of yesterday, having joined a Facebook group calling on the organization to
either immediately wire the remaining amount to Japan or refund all donations.
¡§What was given to Japan belongs to Japan,¡¨ Chiang Pin (¦¿Ùy), posted on the
Facebook group. ¡§How Japan chooses to use that money is their business.
[Taiwan¡¦s Red Cross] should cough up.¡¨
Another, Chen Jui-hsiung (³¯·ç¶¯), said: ¡§This time I donated directly to Japan¡¦s
representative office. Based on experience, I already had no confidence in the
Red Cross Society.¡¨
Phones were ringing around the clock at the Red Cross offices in Taipei, where
volunteers were scrambling to answer calls about how the donations were being
used. On average, it took four or five tries before callers were able to get
through.
¡§As per our long-standing policy, we will honor refund requests. Our donors¡¦
wishes are important to us and we will cooperate,¡¨ Lin said in response to the
Facebook group, adding that the request would increase administrative costs.
The Red Cross Society of the ROC has come under fire in past.
In 2007, it was accused of misusing government subsidies. Financial statements
from the organization showed that up to a third of its annual disaster relief
fund had been set aside for office expenses between 2003 and 2006, in direct
violation of caps on expenses.
The organization has also been criticized for its ongoing policy of giving
kickbacks for fundraisers, which reached 15 percent in its Taipei chapter in
2005 before the practice attracted the attention of regulators.
At a press conference at the legislature yesterday, Democratic Progressive Party
(DPP) lawmakers said they were concerned about the transparency of the fund for
Japan and questioned how much would be lost in administrative and overhead
costs.
¡§There are many valid concerns and I think [the Red Cross] needs to make
themselves very clear,¡¨ DPP Legislator Yeh Yi-jin (¸©y¬z) said. ¡§If they can¡¦t, we
will call on the public to boycott all donations to this secretive
organization.¡¨
Red Cross Society of the ROC officials said that many concerns were based on
misconceptions about how the organization operates.
As per past practice, it has always distributed large disaster relief funds in
stages depending on the needs of each particular relief operation. In the case
of Japan, more funds will be distributed once long-term reconstruction efforts
are finalized.
¡§The goals of the Red Cross¡¦ efforts in Japan are not just disaster relief, but
also long-term reconstruction efforts. We give the money in stages depending on
the needs of disaster-zone residents over time,¡¨ the organization said in a
statement.
Regarding claims by DPP Legislator Gao Jyh-peng (°ª§ÓÄP) that senior organization
administrators made as much as NT$200,000 a month, Red Cross Society of the ROC
officials said that most senior administrators ¡§would be happy if they earned
half that amount.¡¨
However, organization officials declined to answer questions on what percentage
of the NT$1.7 billion received so far would be diverted to overhead costs and
how much would eventually be wired to Japan.
It would be ¡§unfair¡¨ to separate the fund this way, they said.
Organization officials said a final tally of the fund would be made on May 10
when the donation program ended.
Detailed documents on how the money was spent would be made public at that time,
officials said.
Minister of Foreign Affairs Timothy Yang (·¨¶i²K) said he believed the Red Cross
Society of the ROC would handle the money properly according to the needs of
Japan in its disaster relief and reconstruction projects.
¡§Both the Red Cross Society of the ROC and the Japanese Red Cross Society are
trustworthy,¡¨ Yang said.
Whether donations should be sent to Japan in instalments and how the money
should be spent are decisions that should be made by the Red Cross Society of
the ROC and Japanese Red Cross Society, Yang said.
Additional reporting by Shih Hsiu-chuan
|
