|
EDITORIAL : No more
groundless accusations
A media orgy of speculation and rumors has made headlines on a daily basis since
it was announced on May 23 that the chemical di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, or DEHP,
had been found in food additives. The list of beverages, food and other products
impacted by the scare continues to expand.
To address the problem, the Department of Health (DOH) announced that last
Tuesday would be a “D-Day” to end the practice of adding any of six specified
industrial-use chemicals to clouding agents, an emulsifier used in beverages and
foods. The following day the department launched a nationwide investigation,
requiring companies and food stalls to present certification that their products
were free of the six banned chemicals.
At the heart of the scare are the companies that produced the chemicals and
supplied them to countless other manufacturers. However, amid the nationwide
crackdown on tainted products that originated from two suppliers of clouding
agents — Yu Shen Chemical Co and Pin Han Perfumery Co — some in the media have
had their attention diverted from the actual problem of tainted products to
focusing on the owner of Yu Shen Chemical Co, Lai Chun-chieh (賴俊傑), and his son,
a Taipei Times reporter.
For example, unsubstantiated allegations were made by Chinese Nationalist Party
(KMT) Legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅) that Lai had donated heavily to the Democratic
Progressive Party (DPP) and that Lai’s son was being groomed to run as a DPP
lawmaker in New Taipei City. The DPP held a press conference to dismiss Chiu’s
remarks as “groundless lies.”
One again, personalities and politics have intervened to draw the focus away
from the real issues: the extent of the contamination, the failure of the
government’s health and safety standards system to detect the problem earlier
and efforts to ensure there will not be a repeat of the problem.
The food scare crosses all political boundaries, just as it crosses ethnic and
social lines. It also crosses administrative and government agency’s areas of
responsibilities. Playing the blame game and scapegoating just to score a few
political points or gain a few ratings points will not help resolve the problem
or find a way to rectify the system.
Unfortunately, ignoring the real issue to focus on scandals and groundless
speculation has become a common phenomenon among media outlets and political
talk shows — all done while claiming to be defending free speech and the
public’s right to know. Not only does this prevent the public from knowing
anything, least of all gaining a better understanding of the truth behind the
scare, it harms media credibility.
During the trial of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his wife Wu
Shu-jen (吳淑珍) over bribery and corruption charges, all sorts of rumors were
“reported” on political talk shows. Many commentators said they acquired the
information from “credible sources,” including prosecutors, but a lot of the
allegations were proven to be bogus. For example, Chang Yu-hua (張友驊) was
sentenced to 35 days in jail by the Taipei District Court in 2007 for falsely
accusing Chen of meeting former Presidential Office deputy secretary-general
Chen Che-nan (陳哲男), who was involved in the Kaohsiung Rapid Transit Corp
scandal.
Since the lifting of martial law, Taiwanese have enjoyed freedom of speech.
Media outlets and commentators should exercise this freedom with caution,
remembering that with this privilege and right comes responsibilities. They
should provide the public with hard facts and insights through discussion and
debate rather than report rumors and politicize stories.
In the case of the food scare, the public would like to see more about how the
government is handling the incident, ongoing investigations into the tainted
products and which companies are responsible. Groundless speculation and false
accusations are the last thing the public wants to hear.
|
