|
EDITORIAL: Stand up
for freedom of the press
The Ministry of the Interior recently announced that it wants to amend the
Children and Youth Welfare Act (兒童及少年福利法) to place restrictions on how the press
can report the details of cases involving minors. While few people would oppose
an attempt to protect children and young people, this measure is problematic
because it would involve restricting the constitutional right to a free press.
In its attempt to act for what can be seen as commendable reasons, the ministry
has lost sight of the bigger picture.
The ministry wants to keep the grisly details of these crimes from our
newspapers and TV screens based on the assumption that these reports put ideas
into the minds of potential offenders, thus putting children at risk of being
victims of copycat offenses or crimes inspired by the reports.
This is misguided, because it has not been empirically proven that any such
relationship exists. Offenders do not act because of what they see on TV or read
in newspapers. Restricting how these crimes are reported will not stop people
from offending, nor will it help reduce the incidence of crimes against minors.
There is little doubt that considerable room exists to improve the way the
Taiwanese press conducts itself and self-regulation could certainly be
strengthened, but these changes grow organically from ongoing societal discourse
and the prevailing political climate.
The central problem is that the government has made little if any effort to
correct the failings of the press or encourage better behavior. Instead, it has
jumped straight to seeking restrictions on press freedoms with this amendment.
This action misses the point and comes close to abusing the government’s power
to legislate.
Even if we take the government at its word and the amendment passes a third
reading in the legislature, there is little reason to believe it will
successfully curb sensationalist reports given the irredeemable tabloid nature
of certain newspapers and programs, and their penchant for going into the grisly
details of crimes.
News ethics, self-regulation, public distaste: These are mere ephemera to
certain elements in the media that continue to behave as a law unto themselves.
The most likely outcome if this amendment becomes law is that reputable media
outlets will find their hands tied, whereas gossipmongers and sensationalist
media will hide behind teams of lawyers and legal loopholes, carrying on as
usual. The result will be a vicious circle in which — to paraphrase Gresham’s
Law — sensationalist nonsense drowns out genuine information. Not only will this
amendment have failed to achieve its stated purpose, it will also inadvertently
distort news reporting in this country.
Press freedom is a hard-won right. Only recently were clauses prohibiting
political parties from advocating secessionism or communism removed from the
Political Party Act (政黨法), eliminating one of the final legal constraints on
freedom of expression. To go ahead with this amendment now would turn back the
clock on freedom of speech in Taiwan.
In addition, despite the stated good intentions of the amendment, if this one
exception to press freedom is accepted, then how long before another worthwhile
case is found and yet more restraints are deemed necessary to protect some other
group?
Freedom of expression is a human right, not a gift to be given, taken away or
amended at the whim of a political party. It must be protected.
|
